Regulation by the ribosome of the GTPase of the signal-recognition particle during protein targeting.

The signal-recognition particle (SRP) is important for the targeting of many secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Targeting is regulated by three GTPases, the 54K subunit of SRP (SRP54), and the alpha- and beta-subunits of the SRP receptor. When a signal sequence emerges from the ribosome, SRP interacts with it and targets the resulting complex to the ER membrane by binding to the SRP receptor. Subsequently, SRP releases the signal sequence into the translocation channel. Here we use a complex of a ribosome with a nascent peptide chain, the SRP and its receptor, to investigate GTP binding to SRP54, and GTP hydrolysis. Our findings indicate that a ribosomal component promotes GTP binding to the SRP54 subunit of SRP. GTP-bound SRP54 is essential for high-affinity interaction between SRP and its receptor in the ER membrane. This interaction induces the release of the signal sequence from SRP, the insertion of the nascent polypeptide chain into the translocation channel, and GTP hydrolysis. The contribution of the ribosome had previously escaped detection because only synthetic signal peptides were used in the analysis.

Escherichia coli trigger factor is a prolyl isomerase that associates with nascent polypeptide chains.

Correct folding of newly synthesized proteins is proposed to be assisted by molecular chaperones and folding catalysts. To identify cellular factors involved in the initial stages of this process we searched for proteins associated with nascent polypeptide chains. In an Escherichia coli transcription/translation system synthesizing beta-galactosidase we identified a 58-kDa protein which associated with translating ribosomes but dissociated from these ribosomes upon release of nascent beta-galactosidase. N-terminal sequencing identified it as trigger factor, previously implicated in protein secretion. Direct evidence for association of trigger factor with nascent polypeptide chains was obtained by crosslinking. In a wheat germ translation system complemented with E. coli lysates, epsilon-4-(3-trifluoromethyldiazirino)benzoic acid-lysine residues were incorporated into nascent secretory preprolactin and a nonsecretory preprolactin mutant. Trigger factor crosslinked to both types of nascent chains, provided they were ribosome bound. Trigger factor contains key residues of the substrate-binding pocket of FK506-binding protein-type peptidyl-prolyl-cis/trans-isomerases and has prolyl isomerase activity in vitro. We propose that trigger factor is a folding catalyst acting cotranslationally.

A complex of the signal sequence binding protein and the SRP RNA promotes translocation of nascent proteins.

Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is initiated by the signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complex consisting of a 7S RNA and six polypeptides. To investigate the functions of the SRP components, we have tested the activities of several SRP subparticles. We show that the SRP GTPase (SRP54) alone binds a signal sequence and discriminates it from a non-signal sequence. Although SRP54 alone is unable to promote translocation, SRP54 in a complex with SRP RNA is both necessary and sufficient to promote translocation of an elongation-arrested nascent protein in a GTP-regulated manner. For co-translational translocation, additional SRP components are required. We discuss the implications of our results for the function of the Escherichia coli SRP which is homologous to the SRP54/SRP-RNA complex.

Isolation of a murine cDNA clone encoding Rab19, a novel tissue-specific small GTPase.

Using a rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) cloning approach, we have isolated a cDNA clone encoding Rab19, a novel small GTPase of the Rab subfamily contained within partial sequences previously described [Chavrier et al., Gene 112 (1992) 261-264]. Northern blot analysis of the distribution of the rab19 mRNA in various adult mouse tissues and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts revealed that rab19 is expressed in a tissue-specific manner. The rab19 transcript was detected at high levels in intestine, lung and spleen, and at a lower level in kidney. In contrast, liver, brain, heart and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts contain only very little or no detectable rab19 mRNA. Therefore, Rab19 is likely to represent a novel tissue- or cell type-specific small GTPase.

Signal recognition particle (SRP), a ubiquitous initiator of protein translocation.

In higher eukaryotes, most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesised by ribosomes which are attached to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). This allows the proteins to be translocated across that membrane already during their synthesis. The ribosomes are directed to the RER membrane by a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle, the signal recognition particle (SRP). SRP fulfills its task by virtue of three distinguishable activities: the binding of a signal sequence which, being part of the nascent polypeptide to be translocated, is exposed on the surface of a translating ribosome; the retardation of any further elongation; and the SRP-receptor-mediated binding of the complex of ribosome, nascent polypeptide and SRP to the RER membrane which results in the detachment of SRP from the signal sequence and the ribosome and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the membrane. Evidence is accumulating that SRP is not restricted to eukaryotes: SRP-related particles and SRP-receptor-related molecules are found ubiquitously and may function in protein translocation in every living organism. This review focuses on the mammalian SRP. A brief discussion of its overall structure is followed by a detailed description of the structures of its RNA and protein constituents and the requirements for their assembly into the particle. Homologues of SRP components from organisms other than mammals are mentioned to emphasize the components' conserved or less conserved features. Subsequently, the functions of each of the SRP constituents are discussed. This sets the stage for a presentation of a model for the mechanism by which SRP cyclically assembles and disassembles with translating ribosomes and the RER membrane. It may be expected that similar mechanisms are used by SRP homologues in organisms other than mammals. However, the mammalian SRP-mediated translocation mechanism may not be conserved in its entirety in organisms like Escherichia coli whose SRP lack components required for the function of the mammalian SRP. Possible translocation pathways involving the rudimentary SRP are discussed in view of the existence of alternative, chaperone-mediated translocation pathways with which they may intersect. The concluding two sections deal with open questions in two areas of SRP research. One formulates basic questions regarding the little-investigated biogenesis of SRP. The other gives an outlook over the insights into the mechanisms of each of the known activities of the SRP that are to be expected in the short and medium-term future.

Assembly of the 68- and 72-kD proteins of signal recognition particle with 7S RNA.

Signal recognition particle (SRP), the cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle that mediates the targeting of proteins to the ER, consists of a 7S RNA and six different proteins. The 68- (SRP68) and 72- (SRP72) kD proteins of SRP are bound to the 7S RNA of SRP as a heterodimeric complex (SRP68/72). Here we describe the primary structure of SRP72 and the assembly of SRP68, SRP72 and 7S RNA into a ribonucleoprotein particle. The amino acid sequence deduced from the cDNA of SRP72 reveals a basic protein of 671 amino acids which shares no sequence similarity with any protein in the sequence data libraries. Assembly of SRP72 into a ribonucleoprotein particle required the presence of 7S RNA and SRP68. In contrast, SRP68 alone specifically bound to 7S RNA. SRP68 contacts the 7S RNA via its NH2-terminal half while COOH-terminal portions of SRP68 and SRP72 are in contact with each other in SRP. SRP68 thus serves as a link between 7S RNA and SRP72. As a large NH2-terminal domain of SRP72 is exposed on SRP it may be a site of contact to other molecules involved in the SRP cycle between the ribosome and the ER membrane.

The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle is sufficient for the interaction with signal sequences.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to signal sequences when they emerge from a translating ribosome and targets the complex of ribosome, nascent chain and SRP to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) allowing the co-translational translocation of the nascent chain. By photo-crosslinking it has been shown that the signal sequence of preprolactin (PPL) only interacts with the methionine-rich (M) domain of the 54 kDa protein subunit (SRP54) of SRP. Here we show that (i) a signal-anchor sequence is likewise crosslinked only to the methionine-rich domain of SRP54, (ii) free SRP54 can interact with signal sequences independently of the other components of SRP, (iii) its M domain suffices to perform this function, and (iv) an essentially intact M domain is required for signal sequence recognition. Alkylation of the N+G domain in intact SRP54 with N-ethyl maleimide (NEM), but not after cleavage with V8 protease, prevents the binding of a signal sequence to the M domain. This suggests a proximity between the N+G and M domains of SRP54 and raises the possibility that the role of the N+G domain may be to regulate the binding and/or the release of signal sequences.

A lysophospholipase specific for exocrine pancreatic cells is stored in zymogen granules and secreted into pancreatic juice.

We separated by two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis the content of isolated rat zymogen granules and from the gel excised a protein of apparent MW 77,500 and an isoelectric point of about 4.7. A rabbit antiserum against this previously uncharacterized rat zymogen granule protein recognized two cDNA clones in a rat pancreas expression library. The cDNA inserts of these two clones had sequences showing perfect homology to the published cDNA sequence of rat pancreatic lysophospholipase. The antiserum recognized only a single protein, lysophospholipase, on one and two-dimensional immunoblots of rat pancreas homogenates and isolated zymogen granules. The antiserum did not react with any protein in homogenates of rat liver, spleen, adrenal, parotid, and prostate tissue. The zymogen granule protein of the guinea pig, previously identified as Lipase 1, was recognized specifically by the antiserum against rat lysophospholipase. This guinea pig protein can now be regarded as lysophospholipase. The same protein was demonstrated in the transformed rat acinar cell line AR4-2J, where both the rate of total enzyme synthesized and the amount of mRNA increased following treatment with dexamethasone. Immunogold labeling established that pancreatic lysophospholipase is restricted exclusively to exocrine cells where it occurs only in compartments of the exocytotic pathway. It could also be detected in pancreatic juice in the ducts of the tissue. Finally, we have shown that lysophospholipase is not related to the zymogen granule membrane protein GP2. This work establishes that lysophospholipase is a normal member of the set of soluble enzymes and proenzymes that are stored in zymogen granules and secreted into pancreatic juice.

Time course and cellular site of mitotic activity in the exocrine pancreas of the rat during sustained hormone stimulation.

Previous studies from our laboratory indicate that the adaptive response of the exocrine pancreas of the rat to prolonged stimulation with optimal doses of caerulein (0.25 microgram X kg-1 X h-1) follows a characteristic time course in which each step in the secretory pathway is activated. The immediate response is the depletion of zymogen-granule stores followed by coordinate and anticoordinate changes in individual rates of (pro-)enzyme synthesis after a lag period of 2 h. The sum of such changes leads to an increase in total rate of protein synthesis by 3 h which is combined with acceleration of intracellular transport packaging and granule discharge. In the present study the time course of DNA synthesis and the labeling index of five populations of pancreatic cells have been analyzed after caerulein stimulation for periods ranging from 6 to 72 h, using in vivo labeling with 1 mu Ci/g 3H-thymidine 1 h prior to sacrifice of the animals. DNA synthesis did not change during the initial 18 h in spite of persistent stimulation indicated by a 80% reduction on enzyme content. Following this lag period a sharp rise in DNA synthesis 20- to 25-fold above control levels was observed, which decreased by 48 h to reach control levels by 72 h. Increase in DNA synthesis was most pronounced in animals with lowest enzyme content in the pancreas. From the five cell populations studied by autoradiography interlobular duct cells and islet cells had no significant increase in labeling index at any time of stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Selection of AUG initiation codons differs in plants and animals.

The influence of the nucleotide at position -3 relative to the AUG initiation codon on the initiation of protein synthesis was studied in two different in vitro translation systems using synthetic mRNAs. The four mRNAs, transcribed from cDNAs directed by an SP6 promoter, were identical except for mutations at nucleotide -3. In each case, translation of mRNAs produced a single protein of Mr = 12,600. Relative translational efficiencies showed a hierarchy in the reticulocyte lysate system (100, 85, 61 and 38% for A, G, U and C in position -3, respectively) but no differences in the wheat germ system. Differential mRNA degradation or polypeptide chain elongation were excluded as causes of the differences observed in translation in the reticulocyte lysate. mRNA competition increased the differences observed in translational efficiencies in reticulocyte lysate but showed no effect in wheat germ. Analysis of 61 plant and 209 animal mRNA sequences revealed qualitative and quantitative differences between the consensus sequences surrounding AUG initiation codons. Whereas the consensus sequence for animals was CACCAUG that for plants was AACAAUGGC. Both the structural and functional findings suggest that the factors which select AUG initiation codons in plants and animals differ significantly.