Clinical outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffold to treat all-comer patients. Are patients with acute coronary syndrome better candidates for bioresorbable vascular scaffold?

BACKGROUND: Scaffold thromboses (ST) and adverse events and have been associated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) at long-term, but their mechanism remains unclear. We sought to evaluate patient and lesion characteristics associated with mid- to long-term outcomes in patients treated with BVS. METHODS: This is an observational single-center, single-arm, retrospective study evaluating the performance of BVS in an all-comer population, including complex lesions (chronic total occlusions, long lesions), small vessels, and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). RESULTS: From May 2013 to June 2015, we included 482 patients (580 lesions) that were treated with BVS implantation including 71.2% treated for ACS in the present analysis. Mean follow-up period was 816.2 ±â€¯242.6 days. The primary endpoint was device oriented cardiac events (DOCE), defined as a composite of target-lesion revascularization (TLR), ST, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and cardiac death. Using Kaplan-Meier methods, the DOCE and ST rates at 36 months were 9.4% and 2.3%, respectively. No ST occurred between 2 and 3 years and ST occurred after 3 years, in one patient. Using multivariate analysis, ACS was the only significant predictor of lower rates of DOCE (p = 0.04, HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: In this large all-comers real-world cohort, lesions treated with BVS had non-negligible rates of DOCE and ST, in line with previous published randomized trials. The occurrence of very late event was very low after 24 months. ACS patients had lower rates of DOCE.

Long-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffold in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) implantation in selected patients with stable angina has been demonstrated feasible and safe. However, limited data are currently available on long-term outcomes after BVS implantation for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Therefore, we sought to assess the safety, efficacy and long-term results of BVS implantation in STEMI patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of all STEMI patients treated with the Absorb® BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) or conventional drug eluting stent (DES) between 1 April 2013 and 30 March 2014. Primary outcomes were procedural success, device thrombosis and device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. The study included 54 BVS patients and 121 DES patients. RESULTS: Patients were slightly younger in the BVS group (60 vs. 63 years old, p = .03). Other baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Median follow-up was 901 days and 849 days for BVS and DES patients, respectively (p = .01). The cumulative incidence of DOCE was not significantly different between the BVS and DES groups (7.5% vs. 9.1%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-2.2], p = NS). Rate of probable/definite device thrombosis were not statistically different between both groups (3.7% vs. 3.3%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this single-centre retrospective study, one of the first assessing long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in STEMI, seems reassuring with similar long-term results as compared with patients treated with conventional DES.

Effects of the P-Selectin Antagonist Inclacumab on Myocardial Damage After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Timing of Infusion: Insights From the SELECT-ACS Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Effects of the P-Selectin Antagonist Inclacumab on Myocardial Damage After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (SELECT-ACS) trial suggested beneficial effects of inclacumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against P-selectin, on periprocedural myocardial damage. This study evaluated the effect of inclacumab on myocardial damage according to varying time intervals between study drug infusion and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=544) enrolled in the SELECT-ACS trial and randomized to receive 1 infusion of placebo or inclacumab (5 or 20 mg/kg, administered between 1 and 24 hours before PCI) were divided according to the time interval between study drug infusion and PCI. The primary end point was the change in troponin I from baseline at 16 and 24 hours after PCI. In patients receiving inclacumab 20 mg/kg with a short (less than median) time interval between infusion and PCI, placebo-adjusted geometric mean percent changes in troponin I, creatine kinase-myocardial band, and peak troponin I at 24 hours were -45.6% (P=0.005), -30.7% (P=0.01), and -37.3% (P=0.02), respectively. No significant changes were observed in patients with a long (greater than median) time interval between infusion and PCI. Placebo-adjusted geometric mean percent changes in troponin I and creatine kinase-myocardial band were -43.5% (P=0.02) and -26.0% (P=0.07), respectively, when inclacumab 20 mg/kg was administered between 1 and 3 hours before PCI, whereas the drug had no effect with longer intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Inclacumab 20 mg/kg significantly reduces myocardial damage after PCI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and benefits are larger when the infusion is administered <3 hours before PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01327183.

Direct transatrial pericardiocentesis for tamponade caused by left atrial perforation after trans-septal puncture.

Trans-septal puncture is associated with risks of serious complications. We report a case of an obese 52-year-old man with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent preoperative coronary angiography and cardiac catheterisation complicated by left atrial perforation. We describe a direct transatrial pericardiocentesis approach to treating cardiac tamponade.