The Impact of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography on Islet Cell Yield During Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Many patients with recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis who are candidates for total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation (TPIAT) undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, little is known on the impact of ERCP on TPIAT outcomes. We aimed to explore the effect of antecedent ERCP on islet yield and postoperative insulin requirement after TPIAT. METHODS: Through a prospectively maintained database, we identified patients who underwent TPIAT at our institution between 2009 and 2016. After adjusting for confounders, islet cell yield and postoperative insulin requirement were compared between subjects who did and did not undergo ERCP within 2 years prior to TPIAT. RESULTS: Data were available on 167 TPIAT patients during the study period; 105 (62.9%) had undergone ERCP within 2 years prior. Prior ERCP was not associated with a reduction in islet equivalents per patient kilogram (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-2.5; P = 0.31). Antecedent ERCP was not associated with increased postoperative insulin requirement among patients with no diabetes undergoing TPIAT (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-1.83; P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Antecedent ERCP does not appear to have a deleterious impact on islet cell yield during TPIAT. Additional multicenter data are needed to more clearly determine the impact of ERCP in this context.

An assessment of existing risk stratification guidelines for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated that existing risk stratification guidelines for the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis lack accuracy, leading to the overutilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of published guidelines in predicting choledocholithiasis and to determine the impact of laboratory trends on diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We identified patients with suspected choledocholithiasis hospitalized over a 5-year period (2009-2014) at a tertiary care academic medical center. Among eligible patients, we assessed the performance characteristics of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis, confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiography, ERCP, or intra-operative cholangiography. We also evaluated whether a second set of liver function tests improved the accuracy of the guidelines. RESULTS: On presentation, 71 of the 173 eligible patients (41.4 %) met ASGE high-probability criteria for choledocholithiasis. Of these, only 39 (54.9 %) were found to have a choledocholithiasis on confirmatory testing. Conversely, of the 102 patients (58.6 %) who were classified as low or intermediate probability, 32 (31.4 %) had choledocholithiasis. Overall, the accuracy of the guidelines was 63 % (sensitivity 54.9 %; specificity 68.6 %). Incorporating a second set of laboratory tests did not improve accuracy (62.7 %), and a significant decline in liver function tests did not reliably predict spontaneous stone passage. CONCLUSIONS: Existing guidelines performed suboptimally for predicting choledocholithiasis in our patient population, similar to other validation studies. These findings further underscore the importance of developing alternate risk stratification tools for choledocholithiasis, aiming to minimize unnecessary diagnostic ERCP.