Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neural Regen Res ; 15(4): 676-681, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31638091

RESUMO

At present, there is no reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Studies have shown that extracellular vesicles released by damaged cells into biological fluids can be used as potential biomarkers for diagnosis of TBI and evaluation of TBI severity. We hypothesize that the genetic profile of salivary extracellular vesicles in patients with head trauma differs from that in uninjured subjects. Findings from this hypothesis would help investigate the severity of TBI. This study included 19 subjects, consisting of seven healthy controls who denied history of head trauma, six patients diagnosed with concussion injury from an outpatient concussion clinic, and six patients with TBI who received treatment in the emergency department within 24 hours after injury. Real-time PCR analysis of salivary extracellular vesicles in participants was performed using TaqMan Human Inflammation array. Gene expression analysis revealed nine upregulated genes in emergency department patients (LOX5, ANXA3, CASP1, IL2RG, ITGAM, ITGB2, LTA4H, MAPK14, and TNFRSF1A) and 13 upregulated genes in concussion clinic patients compared with healthy participants (ADRB1, ADRB2, BDKRB1, HRH1, HRH2, LTB4R2, LTB4R, PTAFR, CYSLTR1, CES1, KLK1, MC2R, and PTGER3). Each patient group had a unique profile. Comparison between groups showed that 15 inflammation-related genes had significant expression change. Our results indicate that inflammation biomarkers can be used for diagnosis of TBI and evaluation of disease severity. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board on December 18, 2015 (approval No. 0078-12) and on June 9, 2016 (approval No. 4093-16).

2.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 72(10): 793-802, 10/2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-725329

RESUMO

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and psychogenic movement disorders (PMD) are commonly seen in Neurology practice and are categorized in the DSM-5 as functional neurological disorders/conversion disorders. This review encompasses historical and epidemiological data, clinical aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment and prognosis of these rather challenging and often neglected patients. As a group they have puzzled generations of neurologists and psychiatrists and in some ways continue to do so, perhaps embodying and justifying the ultimate and necessary link between these specialties.


Crises não-epilépticas psicogênicas (CNEP) e distúrbios do movimento psicogênicos (DMP) são comuns na prática e na atualidade são melhor categorizados no DSM-V como distúrbios neurológicos funcionais/desordens de conversão. Esta revisão enfatiza os principais dados históricos, epidemiológicos, clínicos, critérios diagnósticos, tratamento e o prognóstico destes pacientes, frequentemente negligenciados e desafiadores, os quais, como um grupo, tem intrigado gerações de neurologistas e psiquiatras, caracterizando, de forma justificada o elo definitivo entre estas especialidades.


Assuntos
Humanos , Transtorno Conversivo/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/diagnóstico , Transtorno Conversivo/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Eletroencefalografia , Prognóstico , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...