RESUMO
Endoleaks are a frequent and well-known complication after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. An endoleak can lead to increased intrasac pressure, sac enlargement, and potential aneurysm rupture. Type II endoleaks result from retrograde filling of aortic branch vessels and can be treated with surgical, endovascular, or direct percutaneous approaches. Direct percutaneous treatment typically involves embolization of the perfused endoleak cavity typically using a translumbar approach with fluoroscopic guidance. We illustrate a novel image-guided approach for percutaneous transabdominal endoleak treatment using contrast-enhanced ultrasound in combination with fluoroscopy.
RESUMO
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains challenging due to late presentation and the presence of accompanying liver dysfunction. As such, most patients are not eligible for curative resection and liver transplant. Management in this scenario depends on a number of factors including hepatic function, tumor burden, patency of hepatic vasculature and patients' functional status. Based on these, patients can be offered catheter based intra-arterial therapy for intermediate stage disease and in more advanced disease, sorafenib. Given recent data, regorafenib is now an option following failure of sorafenib. Catheter directed intra-arterial therapy takes advantage of tumor hypervascularity and the unique dual blood supply of the liver, as hepatic tumors receive arterial perfusion via the hepatic artery while the rest of the liver is supplied by the portal vein. This allows selective embolization and delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor. Compared to best supportive care, intra-arterial therapy offers a survival benefit in intermediate stage HCC and is the recommended approach for treatment. None of the catheter based approaches; including bland embolization, conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) or trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) offers a clear advantage over the other, although DEB-TACE may be characterized by less systemic toxicity. All of these approaches are contraindicated in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). On the other hand, intra-arterial, radio embolization, with Yttrium-90 (Y90) can be offered to patients with PVT. The place of this modality in management of HCC is still being investigated. The role of sorafenib in advanced HCC is not in doubt, as until recently, it was the only systemic therapy approved for the management in this setting. This is despite multiple trials evaluating other agents. The addition of sorafenib to catheter-based therapy in intermediate stage disease has also failed to show any benefit. The modest survival benefit with sorafenib and the failure of other targeted agents suggest that it is important to look beyond inhibition of angiogenesis in advanced HCC. Identification of key drivers and mediators of HCC remains paramount for successful drug development. In line with this, it is refreshing that the excitement that has followed developments in cancer immunotherapy is finding its way to HCC with early trials of anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies showing sufficient activity that phase III trials are now ongoing for Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab in advanced HCC. Future drug development efforts will focus on defining the feasibility of combining different treatment approaches targeting multiple important modulators of HCC.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether technetium-99 (99mTc)-labeled macroaggregated albumin (MAA) can predict subsequent yttrium-90 (90Y) distribution and imaging response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS: Retrospective review was performed of records of 83 patients with HCC who underwent 90Y glass microsphere radioembolization with 99mTc-MAA single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and 90Y positron emission tomography (PET)/CT between January 2013 and December 2014. Images were fused to segment the whole liver normal tissue (WLNT) and the largest tumors. Fused images were reviewed and analyzed for comparison of absorbed dose (AD) to tumors and WLNT as calculated from 99mTc-MAA SPECT and from 90Y PET/CT, subjective imaging comparison of 99mTc-MAA SPECT and 90Y PET for tumors and WLNT, and correlation of tumoral AD with response on follow-up CT. RESULTS: Final analysis included 73 and 63 patients for WLNT and tumor 99mTc-MAA/90Y correlation, respectively, and 62 patients for AD vs response. 99mTc-MAA/90Y limit of agreement for each reviewer was viewed as clinically acceptable only for WLNT (-15 to 15 Gy). AD interreviewer variability was clinically acceptable for WLNT but was too broad for tumor. Mean tumor AD for objective response (78%) was 313 Gy vs 234 Gy for nonresponders. No threshold was found between tumor AD and response (P > .1). Catheter mismatch between 99mTc-MAA and 90Y had a direct impact on AD mismatch between the 2 image sets. CONCLUSIONS: 99mTc-MAA was found to be a poor surrogate to quantitatively predict subsequent 90Y AD to hepatocellular tumors. 99mTc-MAA distribution correlated with 90Y distribution in the normal hepatic parenchyma.
