Experiences of cancer patients in receiving dietary advice from healthcare professionals and of healthcare professionals in providing this advice-a systematic review.

PURPOSE: This systematic review investigated qualitative and quantitative studies exploring patients and healthcare professionals' (HCP) experience of nutrition care throughout the cancer journey. METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched for studies reporting on patient and healthcare professionals' experience of nutrition advice. RESULTS: Fifteen studies including 374 patients and 471 healthcare professionals were included. Findings indicate that patients desire more specific nutrition advice supported by members of the multidisciplinary team and delivered in appropriate and understandable language. Healthcare professionals have highlighted a lack of time, funding, dietetic roles, and knowledge as barriers to integrating nutrition as a standard part of cancer care. Five themes were identified (current provision of nutrition advice, optimal provision of nutrition advice, tension between patient values and nutritional or HCP priorities, providing evidence-based nutrition care, and practical barriers to nutrition advice provision). CONCLUSIONS: Further work is essential to better understand and address identified barriers and improve the provision of nutrition advice to this population. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings from this review will guide the delivery of nutrition advice for cancer survivors.

Leveraging Observational Cohorts to Study Diet and Nutrition in Older Adults: Opportunities and Obstacles.

By 2060, the number of adults aged ≥65 y is expected to double, and the ≥85 y segment of the population is expected to triple in the United States. US federal nutrition guidance is based on the premise that healthy diets contribute to delaying the onset and progression of many age-related diseases and disability. Yet, little is known about the dietary intakes or nutritional needs across the older adulthood age span. This review aims to identify community-based cohorts that collected information on dietary intake of adults ≥65 y in the United States. Thirty-two cohorts met all inclusion criteria. We summarized information on the cohorts' design, demographics, and diet assessment. We also identified key gaps in the existing databases that, if filled, could enhance their utility to address certain research questions. This review serves as a valuable inventory of cohorts that can be leveraged to answer key questions about the diet and nutritional needs of the oldest old, who represent the fastest growing segment of the population in the United States.

Evidence-based nutrition guidelines for cancer survivors in Europe: a call for action.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) document currently available guidelines aimed at healthcare professionals and including some information on the nutritional management of cancer survivors in Europe; (2) assess the quality of these guidelines and (3) document the nutrition recommendations promoted. METHODS: Four search strategies were implemented in 2018 and updated in 2021 to locate guidelines. Papers were included if they described a European guideline or recommendation for cancer survivors that contained nutrition guidance and there were no language restrictions. Two reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument and nutrition content was extracted and summarised. RESULTS: Five guidelines (of 593 documents located through the searches) met the inclusion criteria. The ESPEN guidelines were deemed to have the highest methodological quality. Limited information on nutrition was available in these guidelines with the majority of focus being on the promotion of fruit, vegetables and wholegrains and reducing fat, red meat and alcohol. Weight management was mentioned by all five guidelines. There was no detailed information available for cancer survivors or their healthcare team and no practical strategies for the implementation of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for nutrition guidelines specific for cancer survivors in a European setting. Current guidelines are limited and focus on broad recommendations, while lacking in practical strategies for implementation. There is also a tendency to recommend cancer prevention guidelines be used for cancer survivors rather than developing specific guidance for this group.

Group-based treatment of opioid use disorder with buprenorphine: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Opioid use disorder (OUD) has become a public health crisis in the U.S., and there is a need to develop effective clinical treatment strategies. Coupling buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) maintenance with counseling is encouraged as a best practice, yet the efficacy research on individual counseling in B/N-based Office-Based Opioid Treatment (OBOT) has been equivocal to date. In contrast, models for integrating B/N prescribing through group-based counseling could potentially have a differential impact, yet no systematic reviews have focused on examining the extent of the literature on group-based models of B/N delivery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify existing studies characterizing the different formats of Group-Based Opioid Treatment (GBOT), which we defined as the coupling of B/N prescribing with required office-based group counseling. Using this definition of GBOT, B/N prescribing could occur either concurrently during a medical visit with group counseling (i.e., Shared Medical Appointment) or asynchronously (i.e., Group Psychotherapy). We assessed for all available scientific literature reporting on the feasibility, acceptability and/or efficacy of these different forms of GBOT. The systematic review protocol used PRISMA standards. RESULTS: We included 10 peer-reviewed, full-text articles and 5 conference abstracts of office-based opioid use disorder treatment that reported data on the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of Group-Based Opioid Treatment with B/N. Of the ten full-text articles we included 4 studies describing a shared medical appointment (SMA) model and 6 studies describing a group psychotherapy model. Of these studies, all were low in quality due to study design and only three were randomized controlled trials. No studies were appropriately designed to rigorously compare the efficacy of a GBOT approach (i.e., B/N prescribing with required group-based counseling) versus B/N prescribing with required individual counseling; nor were they designed for rigorous comparison with medication management alone. Nevertheless, most studies reported on the feasibility and acceptability of various models representative of a GBOT approach. CONCLUSION: The small number of studies and study design limited the conclusions that could be drawn about the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of group-based B/N treatment. More research is needed to determine whether benefits exist of GBOT with B/N.

Effectiveness of Workplace Weight Management Interventions: a Systematic Review.

A systematic review was conducted of randomized trials of workplace weight management interventions, including trials with dietary, physical activity, environmental, behavioral, and incentive-based components. Main outcomes were defined as change in weight-related measures. Keywords related to weight management and workplace interventions were used to search relevant databases, and 23 eligible studies were reviewed in detail using a data extraction form and quality assessment checklist. The trials were conducted mainly in the USA and Europe, with four additional countries represented. Interventions were mostly multicomponent and were implemented in both sexes and in a range of employment categories. Intervention effectiveness appeared unrelated to region of the world and was highest in 6-12-month trials. The results ranged widely from clinically significant 8.8-kg weight loss in one trial to less effective than the control treatment in others. Some workplace interventions achieve clinically significant benefits, and further studies are needed to replicate those results in wider sociocultural and geographical contexts.