Activities and participation after primary total hip arthroplasty; posterolateral versus direct anterior approach in 860 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the past decade, a shift occurred in surgical total hip arthroplasty (THA) approaches to the posterolateral (PLA) and direct anterior approach (DAA). Comparisons of postoperative activities and participation between surgical approaches for THA are sparse. We therefore investigated the association between PLA and DAA for THA regarding the construct "activity and participation" (ICF model) during the first postoperative year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational cohort study on osteoarthritis patients scheduled for primary THA in 2 hospitals. Questionnaires to assess the ICF domain "activity and participation" were completed preoperatively, and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (HOOS Activities of daily living (ADL) and Sport and Recreation Function (SR), Hospital for Special Surgery Hip Replacement Expectations Survey, and questions regarding return to work). Each hospital exclusively performed one approach (PLA [Alloclassic-Zweymüller stem] or DAA [Taperloc Complete stem]) for uncemented THA. Hospital was included as instrumental variable, thereby addressing bias by (un)measured confounders. Adjusted mixed-effect models were used, stratified by employment. RESULTS: Total population: 238 PLA (24% employed) and 622 DAA (26% employed) patients. At 12 months, the PLA group had a lower ADL score (-7, 95% CI -12 to -2 points). At 6 months, significantly fewer PLA patients had fulfillment of the expectation sports-performance (OR = 0.3, CI 0.2-0.7]. Other outcomes were comparable. Employed population: At 6 and 12 months, PLA patients scored clinically lower on ADL (respectively -10, CI -19 to 0 and -9, CI -19 to 0 points) and SR (respectively -13, CI -21 to -4 and -9, CI -18 to -1 points). At 6 months, fewer PLA patients fulfilled the expectation joining recreational activities (OR = 0.2, CI 0.1-0.7]. Fulfillment of other expectations was comparable between groups. PLA patients less often returned to work within 3 months (31% vs. 45%), but rates were comparable at 12 months (86% vs. 87%). INTERPRETATION: Overall, functional recovery regarding "activity and participation" was comparable for PLA and DAA. Among employed patients, DAA resulted in better functional recovery and more fulfillment of expectations compared with PLA patients. DAA might also facilitate faster return to work.

Reverse or Hemi Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Single-Blinded Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes between hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as a treatment for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Three Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: This study included 31 patients of which 14 were randomized into the HA group and 17 into the RSA group. INTERVENTION: Patients randomized to the HA group were treated with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture HA and patients randomized to the RSA group with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture RSA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes consisted of range of motion and constant score. Secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale for pain, DASH score, SF-12 scores, and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: After 6 and 12 months of follow-up, RSA showed a significant higher anterior elevation (105 degrees vs. 80 degrees, P = 0.002 and 110 degrees vs. 90 degrees, P = 0.02, respectively) and constant score (60 vs. 41, P = 0.01 and 51 vs. 32, P = 0.05, respectively) compared with HA. There were no significant differences in external and internal rotation. Also, visual analog scale pain, DASH scores, SF-12 scores, and radiological healing of the tuberosities and heterotopic ossification did not show any significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: RSA showed significant superior functional outcomes for anterior elevation and constant score compared with HA for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures after short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty.

AIMS: Limited evidence is available on mid-term outcomes of robotic-arm assisted (RA) partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term survivorship, modes of failure, and patient-reported outcomes of RA PKA. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent RA PKA between June 2007 and August 2016 was performed. Patients received a fixed-bearing medial or lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA; PFA plus medial UKA). All patients completed a questionnaire regarding revision surgery, reoperations, and level of satisfaction. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were assessed using the KOOS for Joint Replacement Junior survey. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 4.7 years (2.0 to 10.8). Five-year survivorship of medial UKA (n = 802), lateral UKA (n = 171), and PFA/BiKA (n = 35/10) was 97.8%, 97.7%, and 93.3%, respectively. Component loosening and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were the most common reasons for revision. Mean KOOS scores after medial UKA, lateral UKA, and PFA/BiKA were 84.3 (SD 15.9), 85.6 (SD 14.3), and 78.2 (SD 14.2), respectively. The vast majority of the patients reported high satisfaction levels after RA PKA. Subgroup analyses suggested tibial component design, body mass index (BMI), and age affects RA PKA outcomes. Five-year survivorship was 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.2 to 99.5) for onlay medial UKA (n = 742) and 99.1% (95% CI 97.9 to 100) for onlay medial UKA in patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (n = 479). CONCLUSION: This large single-surgeon study showed high mid-term survivorship, satisfaction levels, and functional outcomes in RA UKA using metal-backed tibial onlay components. In addition, favourable results were reported in RA PFA and BiKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):108-116.

The Influence of Preoperative Radiographic Patellofemoral Degenerative Changes and Malalignment on Patellofemoral-Specific Outcome Scores Following Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy as to whether the presence of degenerative changes and malalignment of the patellofemoral joint is a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the influence of preoperative radiographic patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis and alignment on intermediate-term knee and patellofemoral joint-specific patient-reported outcomes following fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the records on a consecutive series of patients who had undergone robotic arm-assisted fixed-bearing onlay medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and had a minimum duration of follow-up of 2 years. All records were collected from a single surgeon's arthroplasty registry. Patients with severe bone loss or grooving of the lateral patellar facet were excluded. Radiographic assessment was performed with use of the Kellgren-Lawrence and Altman classification systems as well as with patellofemoral joint alignment measurements. The latest follow-up consisted of a patient-reported questionnaire, including the Kujala (Anterior Knee Pain Scale) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Junior (JR), and satisfaction levels. RESULTS: A total of 536 patients (639 knees) were included. After a mean duration of follow-up (and standard deviation) of 4.3 ± 1.6 years (range, 2.0 to 9.2 years), good-to-excellent Kujala scores were reported independent of the presence of patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis preoperatively (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0 compared with ≥1, p = 0.82; grade ≤1 compared with ≥2, p = 0.84). Similar findings were found when osteoarthritis was present in either the medial or lateral side of the patellofemoral joint as defined by an Altman score of ≥2 (medial, p = 0.81; lateral, p = 0.90). KOOS scores and satisfaction also were not affected by degenerative patellofemoral joint changes. Furthermore, neither the patellar tilt angle nor the congruence angle influenced patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiographic mild to moderate patellofemoral joint degeneration (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1 through 3) and/or malalignment did not compromise intermediate-term knee and patellofemoral joint-specific patient-reported outcomes in patients managed with fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. On the basis of the results of the present study, we believe that neither mild to moderate patellofemoral degeneration nor abnormal patellar tilt or congruence should be considered a contraindication to fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.