Predictive Factors for Morcellation during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to identify predictors of morcellation during a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) taking place in a university hospital center in Quebec, Canada. Participants were women undergoing a TLH for a benign gynaecologic pathology from January 1, 2017, to January 31, 2019. All women underwent a TLH. If the uterus was too voluminous to be removed vaginally, surgeons favoured in-bag morcellation by laparoscopy. Uterine weight and characteristics were assessed before surgery by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging to predict morcellation. RESULTS: A total of 252 women underwent a TLH and the mean age was 46 ± 7 (30-71) years old. The main indications for surgery were abnormal uterine bleeding (77%), chronic pelvic pain (36%) and bulk symptoms (25%). Mean uterine weight was 325 (17-1572) ± 272 grams, with 11/252 (4%) uterus being >1000 grams and 71% of women had at least 1 leiomyoma. Among women with a uterine weight <250 grams, 120 (95%) did not require morcellation. On the opposite, among women with a uterine weight >500 grams, 49 (100%) required morcellation. In addition to the estimated uterine weight (≥250 vs. <250 grams; OR 3.7 [CI 1.8 to 7.7, P < 0.01]), having ≥ 1 leiomyoma (OR 4.1, CI 1.0 to 16.0, P = 0.01) and leiomyoma of ≥5 cm (OR 8.6, CI 4.1 to 17.9, P < 0.01) were other significant predictors morcellation in multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Uterine weight estimated by preoperative imaging as well as the size and number of leiomyomas are useful predictors of the need for morcellation.

Preoperative Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before benign laparoscopic or vaginal gynecologic surgeries. DATA SOURCES: Database searches of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Sciences and citations and reference lists published up to December 2021. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials in any language comparing MBP with no preparation were included. Two reviewers independently screened 925 records and extracted data from 12 selected articles and assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials tool. A random-effects model was used for the analysis. Surgeon findings (surgical field view, quality of bowel handling and bowel preparation), operative outcomes (blood loss, operative time, length of stay, surgical site infection), and patient's preoperative symptoms and satisfaction were collected. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Thirteen studies (1715 patients) assessing oral and rectal preparations before laparoscopic and vaginal gynecologic surgeries were included. No significant differences were observed with or without MBP on surgical field view (primary outcome, risk ratio [RR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.05, p = .66, I2 = 0%), bowel handling (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95-1.08, p = .78, I2 = 67%), or bowel preparation. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in perioperative findings. MBP was associated with increased pain (mean difference [MD] 11.62[2.80-20.44], I2 = 76, p = .01), weakness (MD 10.73[0.60-20.87], I2 = 94, p = .04), hunger (MD 17.52 [8.04-27.00], I2 = 83, p = .0003), insomnia (MD 10.13[0.57-19.68], I2 = 82, p = .04), and lower satisfaction (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87, I2 = 76%, p = .002) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: MBP has not been associated with improved surgical field view, bowel handling, or operative outcome. However, in view of the adverse effects induced, its routine use before benign gynecologic surgeries should be abandoned.

Evaluation of a Standardized Questionnaire for Initial Assessment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Premenopausal Women.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a standardized questionnaire for premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) on clinical information collection and duration of consultation. METHODS: We conducted a before and after study involving 100 premenopausal women undergoing consultation for AUB. During stage 1, 50 consultations were recorded on a consultation sheet with no specific template. During stage 2, 50 women completed a 26-item auto-administered standardized questionnaire before the consultation, which was then reviewed with the consultant and added to the medical record. The duration of consultation was assessed in subgroups of 27 women in each stage. Two independent evaluators assessed the quality and completeness of data collected in the medical records using a score sheet developed by experts. Outcomes from both stages were compared using the t test. RESULTS: The descriptive characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean global scores of the quality and completeness of data collected improved significantly between stages 1 and 2, from 67% ± 12% to 95% ± 5% (P < 0.0001), as did medical background scores (54% ± 29% vs. 85% ± 13%; P < 0.0001) and AUB-related symptoms scores (69% ± 13% vs. 97% ± 5%; P < 0.0001). A mean reduction in duration of consultation of nearly 4 minutes was observed (24.6 ± 4.3 min vs. 20.7 ± 4.8 min; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The AUB-specific standardized questionnaire improves quality and completeness of data collected in medical records and reduces duration of consultation.

Effect of Postoperative Hormonal Suppression on Fertility in Patients With Endometriosis After Conservative Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of hormonal suppression on fertility when administered to infertile patients or patient wishing to conceive after surgery for endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed by two independent reviewers from the databases' inception until December 2020. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials comparing any suppressive hormonal therapy to an inactive control (placebo or absence of treatment) after conservative surgery for endometriosis. Studies that did not report fertility outcomes after surgery were excluded. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias as well as the strength of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines were followed. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled by quantitative random effect meta-analysis. From 3,138 citations, 19 trials (2,028 patients) were included. Overall, no difference was observed between the treatment and the control group for pregnancy (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32) and live births (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.84-1.32). When pooling all hormonal therapies, the duration of administration of postoperative therapy was identified as a substantial source of heterogeneity between studies (I2 difference=74%) with increased chances of pregnancy compared with control when administered for at least 3 months (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04-1.43). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (14 trials, 1,721 patients) were associated with increased chances of pregnancy compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.41; I2=25%). Data were limited for other hormonal treatments with no significant difference between groups. Subgroup analyses taking into account the use of fertility treatments (insemination or in vitro fertilization), stages of the disease and risk of bias of included trials did not modify the results. CONCLUSION: Postoperative hormonal suppression should be considered on a case-by-case basis to enhance fertility while balancing this benefit with the risks of delaying conception. If chosen, GnRH agonists would be the treatment of choice, and a duration of at least 3 months should be favored. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021224424.

Is an abdominal cerclage indicated with a cervical myomectomy? A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical myomectomy can compromise cervical integrity and the risk of subsequent cervical incompetence is unclear. In this case report, the literature on cervical myomectomies is reviewed as well as that on the potential benefits of cervical cerclage. CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old woman, nulligravida, with a 12 cm cervical leiomyoma consulted for heavy menstrual bleeding and pelvic pain. After failure of multiple medical therapies, a laparoscopic cervical myomectomy was successfully performed after pre-operative uterine artery embolization using absorbable gelatin sponges to reduce surgical blood loss. DISCUSSION: A concomitant laparoscopic cerclage was achieved in order to prevent cervical incompetence, given that the full thickness of the anterior cervix was penetrated during the myomectomy.

Technicity in Canada: A Nationwide Whole-Population Analysis of Temporal Trends and Variation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to provide a contemporary description of hysterectomy practice and temporal trends in Canada. DESIGN: A national whole-population retrospective analysis of data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. SETTING: Canada. PATIENTS: All women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indication from April 1, 2007, to March 31, 2017, in Canada. INTERVENTIONS: Hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 369 520 hysterectomies were performed in Canada during the 10-year period, during which the hysterectomy rate decreased from 313 to 243 per 100 000 women. The proportion of abdominal hysterectomies decreased (59.5% to 36.9%), laparoscopic hysterectomies increased (10.8% to 38.6%), and vaginal hysterectomies decreased (29.7% to 24.5%), whereas the national technicity index increased from 40.5% to 63.1% (p <.001, all trends). The median length of stay decreased from 3 (interquartile range 2-4) days to 2 (interquartile range 1-3), and the proportion of patients discharged within 24 hours increased from 2.1% to 7.2%. In year 2016-17, women aged 40 to 49 years had significantly increased risk of abdominal hysterectomy compared with women undergoing hysterectomy in other age categories (p <.001). Comparing women with menstrual bleeding disorders, women undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.44) and myomas (aRR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.94-2.08) were at increased risk of abdominal hysterectomy, whereas women undergoing hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic pain (aRR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.41-1.53) were at decreased risk. Using Ontario as the comparator, Nova Scotia (aRR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27-1.43), New Brunswick (aRR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18-1.32]), Manitoba (aRR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.43), and Newfoundland and Labrador (aRR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27) had significantly higher risks of abdominal hysterectomy. In contrast, Saskatchewan (aRR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.74-0.77) and British Columbia (aRR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88) had significantly lower risks, whereas Prince Edward Island, Quebec, and Alberta were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The proportion of minimally invasive hysterectomies for benign indication has increased significantly in Canada. The declining use of vaginal approaches and the variation among provinces are of concern and necessitate further study.

Guideline No. 412: Laparoscopic Entry for Gynaecological Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of laparoscopic surgery and provide clinical direction on entry techniques, technologies, and their associated complications in gynaecological surgery. TARGET POPULATION: All patients, including pregnant women and women with obesity, undergoing laparoscopic surgery for various gynaecological indications. OPTIONS: The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline included the closed (Veress needle-pneumoperitoneum-trocar) technique, direct trocar insertion, open (Hasson) technique, visual entry systems, and disposable shielded and radially expanding trocars. OUTCOMES: Implementation of this guideline should optimize decision-making in the selection of entry technique for laparoscopic surgery. EVIDENCE: We searched English-language articles from September 2005 to December 2019 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane Library using the following MeSH search terms alone or in combination: laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care approach (Appendix A). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Surgeons performing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Quality of ultrasonography reporting and factors associated with selection of imaging modality for uterine fibroids in Canada: results from a prospective cohort registry.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are common in women and their management is heavily influenced by information gathered through imaging. We aimed to evaluate the type and quality of imaging performed for assessment of uterine fibroids in Canada. METHODS: Starting in July 2015, premenopausal women with symptomatic fibroids were enrolled in a prospective, noninterventional, observational registry (Canadian Women With Uterine Fibroids Registry [CAPTURE]) that included 19 Canadian sites. Clinical characteristics were extracted from the baseline visit. We evaluated the association between demographic and clinical variables of interest with regard to imaging type using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 1493 women, 1148 had ultrasonography, 135 had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 80 had other types of imaging and 130 did not have imaging reported within 12 months of the baseline visit. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients who underwent MRI had larger fibroids (odds ratio [OR] per 1-cm increase 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.17) and more numerous fibroids (1 v. > 1; OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.14-2.64) compared with those who underwent ultrasonography only. For ultrasonography reporting, quality criteria were met for 268 of 1148 patients (23.3%). There was a difference in the quality of reporting among the 19 sites (p < 0.001). Logistic regression model accounting for within-site variability showed that reporting results from ultrasonography in the province of Quebec were less likely to meet all quality criteria (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.66) and those from sites in more populated cities (≥ 400 000 inhabitants) were more likely to do so (OR 6.15, 95% CI 2.20-17.18). INTERPRETATION: We determined that imaging modality for fibroids is associated with patient characteristics. The quality of reporting results for ultrasonography of fibroids in Canada falls short of internationally endorsed guidelines and needs improvement. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02580578.

Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rates in Québec: Trends Over the Last Decade and Predictors of Technicity.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends and predictors of a high technicity index for hysterectomies performed in the province of Québec. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using the ADAM database to determine the annual number hysterectomies performed for a suspected benign condition and the surgical approach used across 81 hospitals in the province of Québec from 2007 to 2017. We calculated the technicity index for each hospital and analyzed trends in surgical approach using the Cochran-Armitage test. We used logistic regression to assess potential predictors of a high technicity index (>70%), including academic centre, urban area, high volume of hysterectomies performed, and greater number of gynaecologists per hospital. RESULTS: Fifty-nine hospitals were eligible for inclusion, representing 96 431 hysterectomies during the study period. Over the decade, the technicity index increased from 43% to 66% (P < 0.001, with a 198% increase in laparoscopic hysterectomies (from 685 to 2039 per year; P < 0.001), a 50% decrease in abdominal hysterectomies (from 5528 to 2790 per year; P < 0.001), and a 8% decrease in vaginal hysterectomies (form 3551 to 3257 per year; P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the total number of hysterectomies per year declined by 17% (P < 0.001). Being an academic centre was the only significant predictor of a high technicity index >70% (68% vs. 38%; OR 7.5; P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Technicity is increasing in the province of Québec and the majority of hysterectomies are now performed using a minimally invasive approach. This shift has mainly occurred through an increase in the laparoscopic approach and a decrease in the abdominal approach. Academic centres are more likely to have high technicity indexes.

Morcellation During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomies: Implications of the Use of a Contained Bag System.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to report the feasibility and clinical implications of in-bag morcellation for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). METHODS: Women who required uterine morcellation during TLH from January 2017 to December 2018 (at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - CHUL, Québec, QC) were included. Women with a preoperative suspicion of malignancy were excluded (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). RESULTS: During the 2-year study period, uterine morcellation was required in 42% (106 of 252) of women undergoing TLH. Mean uterine weight of morcellated uterus was 541 ± 291 g, with 11 of 106 uteri weighing >1000 g. In-bag morcellation was attempted in 84 of 106 (79%) and successfully performed in 79 of 84 (94%) women. Failures resulted from inability to insert the specimen into the bag or apparent perforation. Uncontained morcellation was chosen for 22 of 106 (21%) women, most of whom underwent vaginal morcellation of the uterus. Total operative time was 40 minutes longer for the in-bag morcellation group (170 ± 48 vs. 130 ± 43 min; P < 0.001), although this difference can be partly explained by the higher mean uterine size compared with the uncontained morcellation group (580 ± 309 vs. 391 ± 122 g; P = 0.01). In a subgroup analysis of 16 women, the mean times of installation and extraction of the bag were estimated to be 17 ± 9 and 4 ± 3 minutes, respectively. Complications were infrequent (2 of 106) and occurred in the in-bag morcellation group. CONCLUSION: In-bag morcellation is feasible in a high proportion of women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy and is associated with an increase in operative time. Larger studies will be required in order to better assess the risk of complications with in-bag morcellation and the potential benefits of this technique, namely, reducing the spread of tissue.

Contained Morcellation of Very Large Uterus.

A 38-year-old woman was referred to our centre for symptomatic leiomyoma. The patient had a large uterus, heavy menstrual bleeding, and compressive symptoms refractory to medical treatments. The patient was then scheduled for total laparoscopic hysterectomy with contained morcellation. After circular colpotomy completion, a strong, folded, 4-L bag with an additional sleeve for the optics was inserted into the abdominal cavity through the vagina. The colored tabs on the edge of the bag mouth served as landmarks during bag deployment. After ensuring optimal positioning, the entire bag was fully deployed, and the specimen was placed inside. Thereafter, the coloured tabs were joined together, and a monofilament drawstring was cinched to close the bag and pulled out through the suprapubic trocar. Next, the small extra sleeve was brought up through the umbilical incision. The bag was then insufflated, and the power morcellator was inserted through the suprapubic incision. After completing the morcellation, the pneumo bag was evacuated, and knots were made in both openings of the bag to avoid spillage. The closed bag was finally removed through the vagina, with final laparoscopic closure of the vaginal vault.

Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial ablation/resection and the levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) are well-established treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding to avoid more invasive alternatives, such as hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of endometrial ablation or resection with the LNG-IUS in the treatment of premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and to investigate sources of heterogeneity between studies. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Biosis and Google Scholar as well as citations and reference lists published up to August 2019. Two authors independently screened 3701 citations for eligibility. We included randomized controlled trials published in any language, comparing endometrial ablation or resection to the LNG-IUS in the treatment of premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity. OUTCOMES: Thirteen studies (N = 884) were eligible. Two independent authors extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. Random effect models were used to compare the modalities and evaluate sources of heterogeneity. No significant differences were observed between endometrial ablation/resection and the LNG-IUS in terms of subsequent hysterectomy (primary outcome, risk ratio (RR) = 1.13, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.11, P = 0.71, I2 = 14%, 12 studies, 726 women), satisfaction, quality of life, amenorrhea and treatment failure. However, side effects were less common in women treated with endometrial ablation/resection compared to the LNG-IUS (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.71, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 10 studies, 580 women). Three complications were reported in the endometrial ablation/resection group and none in the LNG-IUS group (P = 0.25). Mean age of the studied populations was identified as a significant source of heterogeneity between studies in subgroup analysis (P = 0.01). In fact, endometrial ablation/resection was associated with a higher risk of subsequent hysterectomy compared to the LNG-IUS in younger populations (mean age ≤ 42 years old, RR = 5.26, 95% CI 1.21 to 22.91, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%, 3 studies, 189 women). On the contrary, subsequent hysterectomy seemed to be less likely with endometrial ablation/resection compared to the LNG-IUS in older populations (mean age > 42 years old), although the reduction did not reach statistical significance (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.24, P = 0.14, I2 = 0%, 5 studies, 297 women). Finally, sensitivity analysis taking into account the risk of bias of included studies and type of surgical devices (first and second generation) did not modify the results. Most of the included studies reported outcomes at up to 3 years, and the relative performance of endometrial ablation/resection and LNG-IUS remains unknown in the longer term. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Endometrial ablation/resection and the LNG-IUS are two excellent treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding, although women treated with the LNG-IUS are at higher risk of experiencing side effects compared to endometrial ablation/resection. Otherwise, younger women seem to present a lower risk of eventually requiring hysterectomy when treated with the LNG-IUS compared to endometrial ablation/resection.

What does non-eligibility for myoma surgery mean in the context of sequential prescription of ulipristal acetate?

Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) is the only selective progesterone receptor modulator currently approved for medical management of myomas. Following several cases of liver toxicity during UPA treatment, new recommendations of PRAC (Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee) and EMA (European Medicines Agency) have been proposed, including a pre-therapeutic assessment of liver function and a close monitoring during treatment. Repeated courses of UPA have also been restricted to women who are defined as "non-eligible" for surgery. This article raises important questions and tries to provide clarification about the concept of 'non-eligibility' for myoma surgery.

Interventional Uterine-Sparing Therapies for Leiomyomas: A Commentary on Myolysis.

Uterine leiomyomas (myomas, fibroids) are very common in premenopausal women and frequently are associated with abnormal uterine bleeding, bulk effects, and reproductive issues. In women who wish to retain their uterus and/or to enhance or retain fertility, interventional therapies have been introduced, including radiofrequency, laser (chromo), cryotherapy, and magnetic resonance (MR)-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) myolysis. In formulating this commentary, all modalities of myolysis from systematic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, and observational studies through December 2018 were reviewed. There are only two treatment modalities available in Canada: the laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids (RFVTA) and MRgHIFU systems. In women who wish to enhance or retain their fertility, the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency and HIFU myolysis have not been clearly established, and these treatments should be offered only after extensive counselling and informed consent. Given the recent concerns regarding the incidence of undiagnosed malignant tumours, the lack of histological confirmation before or after these therapies for symptomatic fibroids mandates a thorough process of informed patient consent before any such interventions.