A phase II study of alternating sunitinib and temsirolimus therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that inhibits VEGF receptor 1, 2, 3 (VEGFRs), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSFR), and the stem cell factor receptor c-KIT. Temsirolimus inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) through binding to intracellular protein FKBP-12. Both agents are approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), have different anticancer mechanisms, and non-overlapping toxicities. These attributes form the scientific rationale for sequential combination of these agents. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy of alternating sunitinib and temsirolimus therapy on progression-free survival (PFS) in mRCC. METHODS: We undertook a phase II, multi-center, single cohort, open-label study in patients with mRCC. Patients were treated with alternating dosing of 4 weeks of sunitinib 50 mg PO daily, followed by 2 weeks rest, then 4 weeks of temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly, followed by 2 weeks rest (12 weeks total per cycle). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included clinical response rate and characterization of the toxicity profile of this combination therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled into the study. The median observed PFS (n = 13 evaluable for PFS) was 8.8 months (95% CI 6.8-25.2 months). Best responses achieved were five partial response, nine stable disease, and three disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 guidelines (two non-evaluable). The most commonly observed toxicities were fatigue, platelet count decrease, creatinine increased, diarrhea, oral mucositis, edema, anemia, rash, hypophosphatemia, dysgeusia, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome. CONCLUSION: Alternating sunitinib and temsirolimus did not improve the PFS in patients with mRCC.

Caregivers' Out-of-Pocket Expenses and Time Commitment Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation at a Rural Cancer Center.

The emotional and physical toll on caregivers of cancer patients is well documented, but research evaluating the financial burdens and time commitments of caregivers is limited. We suspected that the rural location of our cancer center would intensify these burdens for caregivers. We conducted a prospective trial to assess the out-of-pocket expenses and time commitment of caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients within the first 4 weeks after discharge from the hospital from a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer center. These results show that caregivers of autologous recipients paid out-of-pocket expenses of $196 over 4 weeks. If lost wages were included, the expenses increased to $736 during this period. Caregivers of allogeneic recipients had out-of-pocket expenses of $110 in 4 weeks, or a total of $610 when lost wages were included. In the month after discharge from the hospital, caregivers traveled a median distance of 450 miles or 560 miles, depending on whether the patient received an autologous transplant or an allogeneic transplant, respectively. These results demonstrate a compelling need to address caregiver support, given the significant financial out-of-pocket expenses and time commitment.