Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated BED-escalation for peripherally located non-small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: Report the outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and peripheral tumors treated with simultaneous integrated biologically equivalent dose (BED)-escalation (SIBE) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to achieve dose escalation. Materials/methods: Patients with NSCLC within 5 mm of the chest wall treated with a SIBE approach were eligible. Patients received 60 Gy in 5 fractions, with dose decreased to 50 Gy based on proximity to the chest wall. Dosimetry, oncologic outcomes, and toxicity were evaluated. Results: Twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Median BED to the PTV was 135.4 Gy. Median chest wall V30 was 18.7 cc. The 3-year LC, OS, and PFS of the non-metastatic cohort was 93%, 35%, and 39%, respectively. The crude rate of chest wall toxicity was 12.5%, with no rib fractures. Conclusions: SIBE lung SBRT appears to be well tolerated and achieves favorable local control rates and survival.

The vaginal cylinder: Misunderstood, misused, or trivial? An in-depth dosimetric and multiinstitutional outcome investigation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact on dose distribution and radiobiological metrics of common high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy treatment parameters and to analyze multiinstitutional data for clinically significant impact on outcomes in early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were created for all combinations of prescription parameters and used to quantify the dosimetric impact of each parameter and to estimate the dose delivered using common voxel-integrated radiobiological metrics. A rating system, based on risk grouping from GOG and PORTEC trials, was used to consolidate staging information into a cancer "aggressiveness" measure. Correlations between the rating, toxicity, disease recurrence, and plan parameters were investigated. RESULTS: When prescribing to 5 mm depth, the variation caused by the diameter was very large across all dose metrics, ranging from 51% to 175% increase with the most divergence in BEDmax. For surface prescription, changing the cylinder diameter from 4 cm to 2 cm caused the dose metrics of BEDmin, Dmin, and gBEUD (a = -3) to increase by 117%, 67%, and 52%, respectively. Prescription to 5-mm depth caused changes across all dose metrics of 260% compared with surface prescription for a 2-cm cylinder. Deeper prescription point (p = 0.005) and longer treatment length (p = 0.01) were correlated with increased stenosis rates. No correlation between recurrence and any plan parameter was found. CONCLUSIONS: Dramatic differences in dose distributions arise by small variations of plan parameters, with large impact on rates of vaginal stenosis, but no clear relation with local recurrence. To help radiation oncologists interpret the magnitude of these effects for their patients, we created a tool that allows comparison between dose and fractionation parameters.

Impact of Radiation Dose to the Host Immune System on Tumor Control and Survival for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: The significance of radiation dose to the host immune system during the treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown, but higher doses were associated with worse tumor control and overall survival (OS) in a secondary analysis of RTOG 0617. In this study, we sought to assess the impact of the estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) on cancer-specific outcomes in an independent cohort of patients treated at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively identified 117 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive fractionated radiation from 2004 to 2017 at a single academic center (median dose of 60 Gy; 60% underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy and 92% received concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy). EDRIC was calculated as a function of the number of radiation fractions and mean doses to the lung, heart, and remaining body based on a model developed by Jin et al. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 16 months with 77% of patients followed until death. In the entire population, 5-year OS was 11.2% with a median survival of 17.3 months. Median EDRIC for the entire cohort was 6.1 Gy (range, 2.5-10.0 Gy). A higher EDRIC was correlated with greater risk of grade ≥3 lymphopenia (P = .004). On multivariate analysis including total prescription radiation dose, planning target volume, and chemotherapy utilization, EDRIC was independently associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, P = .03), local progression-free survival (HR 1.17, P = .02), and disease-free survival (HR 1.15, P = .04). The median OS for patients with an EDRIC above 7.3 Gy (fourth quartile) and below 5.1 Gy (first quartile) was 14.3 and 28.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses of radiation to the immune system were associated with tumor progression and death after the definitive treatment of stage III NSCLC. Tailoring radiation therapy to spare the immune system may be an important future direction to improve outcomes in this population.