Medial or Lateral, That Is the Question: A Retrospective Study to Compare Two Injection Techniques in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain with Hyaluronic Acid.

Background: Mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (KOA) can be successfully treated using intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA). The medial infrapatellar (MIP) approach and lateral infrapatellar (LIP) approach are two of the most used techniques for performing IA-HA, but it is still not clear which one is preferable. Objectives: The study aims to find the best knee injection technique between MIP and LIP approaches. Methods: In total, 161 patients were enrolled, divided into two groups (MIP or LIP). Each technique was performed once a week for three weeks. Patients were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Roles and Maudsley Score (RMS) at T0 (before the first injection), T1 (one week after the third injection) and T2 (six months after). Results: NRS, KOOS and RMS showed a statistically significant improvement in both groups at all the detection times, without significant differences. No differences were detected between the groups in terms of systemic effect effusions, while the MIP group presented a mildly higher number of bruises in comparison with the LIP group (p = 0.034). Conclusions: Both the IA-HA techniques are equally effective in measured outcomes. The MIP approach seems to produce some local and transient side effects. So, the choice of the LIP or MIP approach depends on the operator's skill and experience.

Intermittent self-catheterization training and effects on treatment adherence and infection.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is the preferred treatment for patients with bladder dysfunction due to spinal cord injuries or multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the learning phase plays a crucial role in the still frequent drop-out. AIM: To examine whether the timing of training affects the treatment compliance and the prevalence of urinary tract infections in patients with neurogenic urinary retention. DESIGN: This is a non-randomized observational study. SETTING: The study was carried out from January 2017 to December 2019 in outpatient settings at the Bari Polyclinic Unipolar Spinal Unit (Bari, Italy). POPULATION: The study included adults with a CISC prescription for neurogenic urinary retention and learning the technique for the first time. METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled, 75 trained immediately after diagnosis and physician prescription, while 25 in the contest of a separate training visit, one or two days after physician prescription. After the training (T0), patient's data and number of prescribed daily catheterizations were recorded and compared with those collected after 6 and 12 months. Accuracy of the procedure and episodes of infections were assessed as well. RESULTS: Adherence to prescribed CISC frequency and complications were not affected by the timing of training. However, patients adherent to the prescribe frequency of catheterization had less risk of infection than those who were not. Further post-hoc analysis confirmed that urodynamic findings and the pathology did not impact the overall occurrence of complications, but infections occurred more frequently in patients with MS (P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of CISC education does not affect treatment adherence or the occurrence of complications. However, the adherence to the CISC prescription seems to reduce the risk of infection. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Patient training can be scheduled according to the organization of the centers, as patient compliance and the occurrence of complications are not affected.

Shock Waves and Therapeutic Exercise in Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Cross-Over.

This study aimed to verify the comparative effectiveness of shock wave therapy versus therapeutic exercise, including the possibility of combining both therapies, in patients who did not respond to the first treatment. A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out, predicting the possibility of a cross-over between the two treatment options, with patients who did not respond to either treatment. Treatments were, respectively, eccentric therapeutic exercise consisting of 30 min sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises, 5 days a week for 4 weeks (Groups A and D) and Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy (ESWT) according to a protocol of three sessions, one per week, each of 2000 pulses at a 4 Hz frequency and administering an energy flux density (EFD) varying between 0.03 mJ/mm2 and 0.17 mJ/mm2 (Groups B and C). Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), 2 (T1), 4 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after the last session, using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Low Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and Roles and Maudsley Scale (RMS). The whole study population demonstrated a progressive clinical reduction in pain according to NRS, a recovery from disability according to LEFS and a perception of recovery according to RMS within 6 months, with no significant differences between the four protocols (exercise; ESWT; exercise + ESWT; and ESWT + exercise). Both therapies are therefore valid options in patients with trochanteritis; the combination of the two therapies could be evaluated for those patients who do not respond to the single treatment.