[Fillet flap transfer as alternative to conventional lower limb amputation]. / Filetlappentransfer als Alternative zu konventionellen Amputationen der unteren Extremität.

BACKGROUND: The fitting of a prosthesis after lower limb amputation is associated with several challenges. Skeletal stump-prosthesis interfaces and selective nerve transfer can partially overcome these but are also associated with new impairments that emphasize the necessity of innovative approaches. The concept of so-called spare part surgery with the use of fillet flaps could play an important role in this respect. OBJECTIVE: An overview of the classical prosthesis-associated discomforts, advantages and disadvantages of treatment strategies and presentation of alternative surgical concepts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A selective literature search was carried out considering the experiences of the authors and perspectives with respect to the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical treatment options. Furthermore, a clinical case is presented. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The transfer of the sole of the foot as a fillet flap to the weight-bearing region of the amputation stump offers a number of benefits, such as creating a fully weight-bearing stump, prevention of neuralgia, preserved sensation and conservation of the body image. As long as the calcaneal region is not impaired, this technique can be performed in amputations below as well as above the knee. The question of whether parts of the bone should be included in the transfer must be individually evaluated for each patient. This approach enables optimization of the residual limb stump for the subsequent fitting of a prosthesis for the patient.

[Calculating personnel allocation at 100 % implementation of the Psychiatry Personnel Act. Can it be done on the basis of existing routine data?]. / Berechnung der Personalbemessung bei einer Umsetzung von 100 % Psych-PV. Kann diese auf der Grundlage vorliegender Routinedaten erfolgen?

From 1 January 2019, after completion of the convergence phase, the Psychiatry Personnel Act (Psych-PV) will no longer be the basis of budget negotiations of psychiatric hospitals and departments with the health insurance funds in Germany. Instead, the new compounding remuneration system for psychiatric and psychosomatic inpatient institutions (PEPP) will provide a new framework. The Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) has been given the task of elaborating a directive on the basis of the expiring Psych-PV in order to redefine standards for personnel allocation within this new framework. This task presupposes the existence of reliable data in the psychiatric hospitals and departments for categorizing patients following the Psych-PV. It presupposes further that these data allow an exact calculation of the personnel to which the clinics are entitled. This article shows that the so-called §-21 dataset from the database of the VIPP project (indicators of patient care in psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities) allows this calculation. The VIPP dataset was used as a basis to calculate the personnel requirements. Exemplary analyses illustrate that the information available regarding the Psych-PV can be transformed in minutes per day, minutes per month and full time positions. Therefore, this information would also be available to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK).

What is the benefit of involuntary short-term psychiatric hospitalisation?

In Germany, psychiatric patients considered to be a danger to themselves or others may be detained involuntarily for 24 hours, after which the court must be consulted. Only Baden-Württemberg, of all the German states, allows for 72 hours confinement. In a study of 70 patients who were involuntarily hospitalized at a university hospital, it was found that when patients are subject to a 72 hour doctors' court hold, as compared to the 24 hour hold, the number of patients committed to treatment by the court was reduced by about 50%. This applies particularly to younger patients with addiction or neurotic disorders. Schizophrenic patients and older patients with organic brain disease were more likely to be detained on court order. Two-thirds of the patients who were involuntarily hospitalized said that they felt adequately informed about their legal rights, but only about a third felt that involuntary hospitalisation was justified.