Outcome and right ventricle remodelling after valve replacement for pulmonic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Complications and need for reinterventions are frequent in patients with pulmonary valve stenosis (PVS). Pulmonary regurgitation is common, but no data are available on outcome after pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 215 patients with PVS who underwent surgical valvotomy or balloon valvuloplasty. Incidence and predictors of reinterventions and complications were identified. Right ventricle (RV) remodelling after PVR was also assessed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 38.6 (30.9-49.4) years, 93% of the patients were asymptomatic. Thirty-nine patients (18%) had at least one PVR. Associated right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) intervention and the presence of an associated defect were independent predictors of reintervention (OR: 4.1 (95% CI 1.5 to 10.8) and OR: 3.6 (95% CI 1.9 to 6.9), respectively). Cardiovascular death occurred in 2 patients, and 29 patients (14%) had supraventricular arrhythmia. Older age at the time of first intervention and the presence of an associated defect were independent predictors of complications (OR: 1.0 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.1) and OR: 2.1 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.2), respectively). In 16 patients, cardiac magnetic resonance before and after PVR was available. The optimal cut-off values for RV volume normalisation were 193 mL/m2 for RV end-diastolic volume indexed(sensitivity 80%, specificity 64%) and 100 mL/m2 for RV end-systolic volume indexed(sensitivity 80%, specificity 56%). CONCLUSIONS: Previous RVOT intervention, presence of an associated defect and older age at the time of first repair were predictors of outcome. More data are needed to guide timing of PVR, and extrapolation of tetralogy of Fallot guidelines to this population is unlikely to be appropriate.

Caseous Calcification of the Mitral Annulus: A Role for Surgery.

An 80-year-old man followed for aortic stenosis was found to have an intracardiac mass. Multiple imaging modalities were inconclusive in characterizing the mass but raised concerns about the potential malignancy of the mass. Fear of operating on an elderly patient with a potential for cardiac neoplasia led to a percutaneous transseptal biopsy that failed to provide a clear diagnosis. Cardiac valvular surgery was performed in addition to excisional biopsy of the mass that turned out to be caseous necrosis of mitral annular calcifications.

Usefulness of a titration algorithm for de novo users of sacubitril/valsartan in a tertiary centre heart failure clinic.

BACKGROUND: A reduction in the rate of death and hospitalisations in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction receiving sacubitril/valsartan compared to enalapril was demonstrated in the PARADIGM-HF study. However, tolerability when initiating and optimising sacubitril/valsartan treatment in real clinical practice is unknown. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of clinical and biochemical parameters of the first 100 patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan in a tertiary HF clinic. Patients had titration of the molecule guided by an algorithm developed by pharmacists and cardiologists in the clinic. The objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients reaching the maximal dosage, the time to reach maximal dosage, and the rate of adverse events, as well as the required modification of other HF therapy during the sacubitril/valsartan titration. RESULTS: Forty-six per cent of patients reached the sacubitril/valsartan maximal dose of 97/103 mg (200 mg) twice daily and 73% received at least 49/51 mg (100 mg) twice daily. Mean titration time was 30 ± 9 days. Symptomatic hypotension, renal dysfunction (increase in creatinine level > 30%) and hyperkalaemia (potassium level > 5.5 mmol/l) occurred in nine, four and 2% of patients, respectively. Background HF pharmacological treatment remained stable during the sacubitril/valsartan titration but daily dosage of furosemide was reduced by 13% (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm is a safe and easy-to-use tool in daily clinical practice for the introduction and titration of sacubitril/valsartan. Almost half of the patients reached the maximal dose, with a tolerability profile in line with the original study.

Dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony and severe mitral regurgitation caused by exercise: should we go beyond the guidelines?

Guidelines for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have been established, but there may be a subgroup of patients not identified in these guidelines who may benefit from this therapy. We report a patient with a dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony and severe mitral regurgitation caused by exercise successfully treated with CRT. Exercise testing should be considered in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and QRS <130 ms with severe heart failure symptoms that are unexplained by rest echocardiography evaluation in order to rule out ischemia and/or dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony. In the presence of exercise-induced left ventricular bundle branch block, the implantation of CRT should be contemplated.