Does visuospatial neglect contribute to standing balance within the first 12 weeks post-stroke? A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Visuospatial neglect (VSN) has been suggested to limit standing balance improvement post-stroke. However, studies investigating this association longitudinally by means of repeated within-subject measurements early post-stroke are lacking. This prospective longitudinal cohort study evaluates the longitudinal association of egocentric and allocentric VSN severity with 1) standing balance independence and 2) postural control and weight-bearing asymmetry (WBA) during quiet standing, in the first 12 weeks post-stroke. METHODS: Thirty-six hemiplegic individuals after a first-ever unilateral stroke were evaluated at weeks 3, 5, 8 and 12 post-stroke. Egocentric and allocentric VSN severity were evaluated using the Broken Hearts Test. The standing unperturbed item of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS-s) was used to clinically evaluate standing independence. Posturographic measures included measures of postural control (mediolateral (ML)/anteroposterior (AP) net center-of-pressure velocities (COPvel)) and WBA during quiet standing. A linear mixed model was used to examine longitudinal associations between egocentric and allocentric VSN, and BBS-s, COPvel-ML, COPvel-AP and WBA within the first 12 weeks post-stroke. RESULTS: Egocentric (ß = -0.08, 95%CI[-0.15;-0.01], P = .029) and allocentric VSN severity (ß = -0.09, 95%CI[-0.15; -0.04], P = .002) were significant independent factors for BBS-s scores in the first 12 weeks post-stroke. Egocentric and allocentric VSN were no significant independent factors for COPvel-ML, COPvel-AP and WBA in the first 12 weeks post-stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Allocentric and egocentric VSN severity were significantly associated with decreased standing independence, but not impaired postural control or greater asymmetric weight-bearing, in the early subacute post-stroke phase. This may involve traditional VSN measures being not sensitive enough to detect fine-grained VSN deficits due to a ceiling effect between 5 and 8 weeks post-stroke, once the individual regains standing ability. Future studies may require more sensitive VSN measurements to detect such deficits. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov. unique identifier NCT05060458.

The Association of Personal Neglect with Motor, Activities of Daily Living, and Participation Outcomes after Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Despite its potential clinical impact, the association of personal neglect (PN) with motor, activities of daily living (ADL), and participation outcomes after stroke is not well-understood. This first-ever systematic review on the topic therefore evaluates this association, taking into account suggested subtypes of PN, including body representation neglect, somatosensory neglect, motor neglect, and premotor neglect. A systematic literature search was conducted on February 17, 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PubPsych, and PsycArticles databases. The study adheres to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and its protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187460). Eleven observational studies were included, gathering 1,400 individuals after stroke (429 showed PN). Results show that individuals with body representation neglect after stroke have significantly decreased movement control and motor strength, lower functional mobility, and ADL independency compared with those without body representation neglect after stroke. Individuals with motor neglect after stroke showed worse motor function and spasticity than to those without motor neglect after stroke. Nonspecified PN (i.e., PN evaluated with an outcome measure that does not allow subcategorization) was related to worse lateropulsion with pushing, longer length of stay and greater odds of being discharged to somewhere other than home. No study evaluated somatosensory and premotor neglect. This review highlights the limited research in this area and emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive PN assessment. However, currently available assessment tools show limited ability to accurately diagnose PN subtypes and future research should prioritize the development of comprehensive diagnostic test batteries.

The Neuroanatomy of Poststroke Subjective Sensory Hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Although subjective sensory hypersensitivity is prevalent after stroke, it is rarely recognized by health care providers, and its neural mechanisms are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the neuroanatomy of poststroke subjective sensory hypersensitivity as well as the sensory modalities in which subjective sensory hypersensitivity can occur by conducting both a systematic literature review and a multiple case study of patients with subjective sensory hypersensitivity. METHOD: For the systematic review, we searched three databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) for empirical articles discussing the neuroanatomy of poststroke subjective sensory hypersensitivity in humans. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the case reports critical appraisal tool and summarized the results using a qualitative synthesis. For the multiple case study, we administered a patient-friendly sensory sensitivity questionnaire to three individuals with a subacute right-hemispheric stroke and a matched control group and delineated brain lesions on a clinical brain scan. RESULTS: Our systematic literature search resulted in four studies (describing eight stroke patients), all of which linked poststroke subjective sensory hypersensitivity to insular lesions. The results of our multiple case study indicated that all three stroke patients reported an atypically high sensitivity to different sensory modalities. These patients' lesions overlapped with the right anterior insula, the claustrum, and the Rolandic operculum. CONCLUSION: Both our systematic literature review and our multiple case study provide preliminary evidence for a role of the insula in poststroke subjective sensory hypersensitivity and suggest that poststroke subjective sensory hypersensitivity can occur in different sensory modalities.

Sensory sensitivity after acquired brain injury: A systematic review.

Patients with acquired brain injury frequently report experiencing sensory stimuli as abnormally under- (sensory hyposensitivity) or overwhelming (sensory hypersensitivity). Although they can negatively impact daily functioning, these symptoms are poorly understood. To provide an overview of the current evidence on atypical sensory sensitivity after acquired brain injury, we conducted a systematic literature review. The primary aim of the review was to investigate the behavioural and neural mechanisms that are associated with self-reported sensory sensitivity. Studies were included when they studied sensory sensitivity in acquired brain injury populations, and excluded when they were not written in English, consisted of non-empirical research, did not study human subjects, studied pain, related sensory sensitivity to peripheral injury or studied patients with a neurodegenerative disorder, meningitis, encephalitis or a brain tumour. The Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for appropriate studies. A qualitative synthesis of the results of the 81 studies that were included suggests that abnormal sensory thresholds and a reduced information processing speed are candidate behavioural mechanisms of atypical subjective sensory sensitivity after acquired brain injury. Furthermore, there was evidence for an association between subjective sensory sensitivity and structural grey or white matter abnormalities, and to functional abnormalities in sensory cortices. However, further research is needed to explore the causation of atypical sensory sensitivity. In addition, there is a need for the development of adequate diagnostic tools. This can significantly advance the quantity and quality of research on the prevalence, aetiology, prognosis and treatment of these symptoms.

Association between spatial neglect and impaired verticality perception after stroke: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although most research on spatial neglect (SN) has focused on spatial perception deficits with regard to the lateral (left-right) axis, deficits of spatial perception with regard to the vertical (up-down) axis, such as disturbances in the perception of verticality (e.g., judgement of vertical orientations), have also been suggested. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically analyse reported associations between SN and characteristics of verticality perception while considering the time post-stroke. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PubPsych and PsycArticles databases were searched on May 24, 2022 for articles written in English that evaluated the association between SN and verticality perception (i.e., the subjective visual vertical [SVV], subjective postural vertical [SPV] and subjective haptic vertical [SHV]) in adults after stroke. Left and right SN were considered and had to be assessed using standardized methods. Data were manually extracted, and risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The tilt of the line/chair relative to the gravitational vector and its direction, together with uncertainty (i.e., variability across measurements), were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included (431 participants after stroke); at least 191 participants exhibited SN. Mainly the first 3 to 6 months post-stroke were evaluated. SN was associated with SVV misperception, which resulted in larger SVV tilts (mostly in the contralesional direction) and uncertainty in participants with than without SN. SVV tilt magnitudes ranged from a mean/median of -8.9° to -2.3° in SN participants and from -1.6° to 0.6° in non-SN participants, the latter falling within normative ranges. For SPV and SHV measurements, the magnitude of tilt and the uncertainty were insufficiently assessed or results were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: SN was associated with larger SVV tilts and uncertainty, which suggests that SVV misperception is a key feature of SN. This observation highlights the importance of regular SVV assessment in people with SN in clinical practice. PROSPERO: CRD42019127616.

The Dutch Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): psychometric properties in Flemish stroke survivors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Oxford Cognitive Screen is a stroke-specific screen to evaluate attention, executive functions, memory, praxis, language, and numeric cognition. It was originally validated in England for acute stroke patients. In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the Dutch OCS (OCS-NL). METHODS: A total of 193 (99 acute stroke unit, 94 rehabilitation unit) patients were included in our study. A subset of patients (n = 128) completed a retest with the parallel version of the OCS-NL. RESULTS: First, we did not find evidence for a difference in prevalence of impairment between patients in the acute stroke versus rehabilitation unit on all but one of the subtests. For praxis, we observed a 14% lower prevalence of impairment in the rehabilitation than the acute stroke unit. Second, the parallel-form reliability ranged from weak to excellent across subtests. Third, in stroke patients below age 60, the OCS-NL had a 92% sensitivity relative to the MoCA, while the MoCA had a 55% sensitivity relative to the OCS-NL. Last, although left-hemispheric stroke patients performed worse on almost all MoCA subdomains, they performed similarly to right-hemispheric stroke patients on non-language domains on the OCS-NL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the OCS-NL is a reliable cognitive screen that can be used in acute stroke and rehabilitation units. The OCS-NL may be more sensitive to detect cognitive impairment in young stroke patients and less likely to underestimate cognitive abilities in left-hemispheric stroke patients than the MoCA.

An immersive virtual reality game to train spatial attention orientation after stroke: A feasibility study.

Immersive virtual reality (IVR) may boost neglect recovery, as it can provide an engaging experience in a 3D environment. We designed an IVR rehabilitation game for neglect patients using the Oculus Rift. Multisensory cues were presented in the neglected visual field in a patient-tailored way. We acquired pilot data in 15 neurologically healthy controls and 7 stroke patients. First, we compared cybersickness before and after VR exposure. Second, we assessed the user experience through a questionnaire. Third, we tested whether neglect symptoms corresponded between the VR game and a computerized cancelation task. Fourth, we evaluated the effect of the multisensory cueing on target discrimination. Last, we tested two algorithms to tailor the game to the characteristics of the neglected visual field. Cybersickness significantly reduced after VR exposure in six stroke patients and was low in healthy controls. Patients rated the user experience neutral to positive. In addition, neglect symptoms were consistent between a computerized cancelation and VR rehabilitation task. The multisensory cue positively affected target discrimination in the game and we successfully presented sensory stimulation to the neglected visual field in a patient-tailored way. Our results show that it is promising to use gamified patient-tailored immersive VR for neglect rehabilitation.

Evolution and prediction of mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function after stroke: a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A previously shown 'mismatch' group of patients with good observed upper limb (UL) motor function but low perceived UL activity at six months post stroke tends to use the affected UL less in daily life than would be expected based on clinical tests, and this mismatch may also be present at 12 months. We aimed to confirm this group in another cohort, to investigate the evolution of this group from six to 12 months, and to determine factors on admission to inpatient rehabilitation and at 6 months that can discriminate between mismatch and good match groups at 12 months. METHODS: Persons after stroke were recruited on rehabilitation admission and re-assessed at six and 12 months. Observed UL function was measured with the upper extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) and perceived UL activity by the hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS-Hand). We defined mismatch as good observed UL function (FMA-UE > 50/66) but low perceived activity (SIS-Hand≤75/100). Potential discriminators at admission and 6 months (demographic characteristics, stroke characteristics, UL somatosensory function, cognitive deficits, mental function and activity) were statistically compared for match and mismatch groups at 12 months. RESULTS: We included 60 participants (female: 42%) with mean (SD) age of 65 (12) years. We confirmed a mismatch group of 11 (18%) patients at 6 months, which increased to 14 (23%) patients at 12 months. In the mismatch group compared to the good match group at 12 months, patients had a higher stroke severity and more somatosensory impairments on admission and at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed a group of patients with good observed UL function but low perceived activity both at six and at 12 months post stroke. Assessment of stroke severity and somatosensory impairments on admission into rehabilitation could determine mismatch at 12 months and might warrant intervention. However, large differences in clinical outcomes between patients in the mismatch group indicate the importance of tailoring training to the individual needs.

SWEAT2 study: effectiveness of trunk training on muscle activity after stroke. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Trunk training after stroke is an effective method for improving trunk control, standing balance and mobility. The SWEAT2 study attempts to discover the underlying mechanisms leading to the observed mobility carry-over effects after trunk training. AIM: A secondary analysis investigating the effect of trunk training on muscle activation patterns, muscle synergies and motor unit recruitment of trunk and lower limbs muscles, aimed to provide new insights in gait recovery after stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Monocentric study performed in the RevArte Rehabilitation Hospital (Antwerp, Belgium). POPULATION: Forty-five adults diagnosed with first stroke within five months, of which 39 completed treatment and were included in the analysis. METHODS: Participants received 16 hours of additional trunk training (N.=19) or cognitive training (N.=20) over the course of four weeks (1 hour, 4 times a week). They were assessed by an instrumented gait analysis with electromyography of trunk and lower limb muscles. Outcome measures were linear integrated normalized envelopes of the electromyography signal, the amount and composition of muscle synergies calculated by nonnegative matrix factorization and motor unit recruitment calculated, by mean center wavelet frequencies. Multivariate analysis with post-hoc analysis and statistical parametric mapping of the continuous curves were performed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in muscle activation patterns and the amount of muscle synergies. In 42% of the subjects, trunk training resulted in an additional muscle synergy activating trunk muscles in isolation, as compared to 5% in the control group. Motor unit recruitment of the of trunk musculature showed decreased fast-twitch motor recruitment in the erector spinae muscle after trunk training: for the hemiplegic (t[37]=2.44, P=0.021) and non-hemiplegic erector spinae muscle (t[37]=2.36, P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Trunk training improves selective control and endurance of trunk musculature after sub-acute stroke. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: What is new to the actual clinical rehabilitation knowledge is that: trunk training does not alter muscle activation patterns or the amount of muscle synergies over time; a decrease in fast-twitch motor recruitment in the erector spinae muscle was found during walking after trunk training; trunk training seems to increase the fatigue-resistance of the back muscles and enables more isolated activation.

The association between visuospatial neglect and balance and mobility post-stroke onset: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although previous narrative reviews have highlighted a potential association between visuospatial neglect (VSN) and balance disorders, to what extent different areas of balance and mobility could be affected is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review updates previous literature findings and systematically reviews sitting balance, standing balance and mobility outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Naric-Rehabdata, PEDro and the Cochrane Trials Library were systematically searched. Methodological quality was assessed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. The association between VSN and sitting balance, standing balance and mobility (walking, stair climbing/descending and transfers) was investigated. RESULTS: In total, 48 studies were included (4595 stroke survivors): at least 1319 (29%) showed symptoms of VSN. VSN was associated with less independence during sitting, with an asymmetric posture toward the affected body side. For standing balance, we revealed a significant negative association between VSN and mediolateral stability and weight shifting, whereas only activities of daily living-related VSN was associated with weight-bearing asymmetry during static stance. While walking, patients with VSN laterally deviated from their path. Results were inconclusive regarding other aspects of mobility. The association between VSN and balance/mobility seemed to decrease over time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite great heterogeneity in results, this study suggests that stroke survivors with VSN show specific deviations in posture and movement in the mediolateral direction. Although the association between VSN and balance/mobility has been extensively investigated, explanatory studies evaluating underlying mechanisms of the frequently present association are lacking. Future studies should address this by combining clinical and instrumented assessment of balance and gait performance, preferably longitudinally to investigate the associations over time.

Sensorimotor vs. Motor Upper Limb Therapy for Patients With Motor and Somatosensory Deficits: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Early Rehabilitation Phase After Stroke.

Background: Somatosensory function plays an important role in motor learning. More than half of the stroke patients have somatosensory impairments in the upper limb, which could hamper recovery. Question: Is sensorimotor upper limb (UL) therapy of more benefit for motor and somatosensory outcome than motor therapy? Design: Randomized assessor- blinded multicenter controlled trial with block randomization stratified for neglect, severity of motor impairment, and type of stroke. Participants: 40 first-ever stroke patients with UL sensorimotor impairments admitted to the rehabilitation center. Intervention: Both groups received 16 h of additional therapy over 4 weeks consisting of sensorimotor (N = 22) or motor (N = 18) UL therapy. Outcome measures: Action Research Arm test (ARAT) as primary outcome, and other motor and somatosensory measures were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and after 4 weeks follow-up. Results: No significant between-group differences were found for change scores in ARAT or any somatosensory measure between the three time points. For UL impairment (Fugl-Meyer assessment), a significant greater improvement was found for the motor group compared to the sensorimotor group from baseline to post-intervention [mean (SD) improvement 14.65 (2.19) vs. 5.99 (2.06); p = 0.01] and from baseline to follow-up [17.38 (2.37) vs. 6.75 (2.29); p = 0.003]. Conclusion: UL motor therapy may improve motor impairment more than UL sensorimotor therapy in patients with sensorimotor impairments in the early rehabilitation phase post stroke. For these patients, integrated sensorimotor therapy may not improve somatosensory function and may be less effective for motor recovery. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03236376.

SWEAT2 Study: Effectiveness of Trunk Training on Gait and Trunk Kinematics After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Trunk training after stroke is an effective method for improving mobility, yet underlying associations leading to the observed mobility carryover effects are unknown. The purposes of this study were to investigate the effectiveness of trunk training for gait and trunk kinematics and to find explanatory variables for the mobility carryover effects. METHODS: This study was an assessor-masked, randomized controlled trial. Participants received either additional trunk training (n = 19) or cognitive training (n = 20) after subacute stroke. Outcome measures were the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), the Trunk Impairment Scale, spatiotemporal gait parameters, center-of-mass excursions, and trunk and lower limb kinematics during walking. Multivariate analysis with post hoc analysis was performed to observe treatment effects. Correlation and an exploratory regression analysis were used to examine associations with the mobility carryover effects. RESULTS: Significant improvements after trunk training, compared with the findings for the control group, were found for the Trunk Impairment Scale, Tinetti POMA, walking speed, step length, step width, horizontal/vertical center-of-mass excursions, and trunk kinematics. No significant differences were observed in lower limb kinematics. Anteroposterior excursions of the trunk were associated with 30% of the variability in the mobility carryover effects. CONCLUSIONS: Carryover effects of trunk control were present during ambulation. Decreased anteroposterior movements of the thorax were the main variable explaining higher scores on the Tinetti POMA Gait subscale. However, the implementation and generalizability of this treatment approach in a clinical setting are laborious and limited, necessitating further research. IMPACT: Trunk training is an effective strategy for improving mobility after stroke. Regaining trunk control should be considered an important treatment goal early after stroke to adequately prepare patients for walking.

The Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke: Psychometric Properties of an Observation-Based Bimanual Upper Limb Performance Measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate interrater and intrarater reliability, measurement error, and convergent and discriminative validity of the Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke (Ad-AHA Stroke). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: A total of 7 stroke rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Stroke survivors (reliability sample: n=30; validity sample: N=118) were included (median age 67y; interquartile range [IQR], 59-76); median time poststroke 81 days (IQR 57-117). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ad-AHA Stroke, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA). The Ad-AHA Stroke is an observation-based instrument assessing the effectiveness of the spontaneous use of the affected hand when performing bimanual activities in adults poststroke. Reliability of Ad-AHA Stroke was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland-Altman plots, and weighted kappa statistics for reliability on item level. SEM was calculated based on Ad-AHA units. Convergent validity was assessed by calculating Spearman rank correlation coefficients between Ad-AHA Stroke and ARA test and UE-FMA. Comparison of Ad-AHA Stroke scores between subgroups of patients according to hand dominance, neglect, and age evaluated discriminative validity. RESULTS: Intrarater and interrater agreement showed an ICC of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-0.99), an SEM of 2.15 and 1.64 out of 100, respectively, and weighted kappa for item scores were all above 0.79. The relation between Ad-AHA and other clinical assessments was strong (ρ=0.9). Patients with neglect had significantly lower Ad-AHA scores compared to patients without neglect (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: The Ad-AHA Stroke captures actual bimanual performance. Therefore, it provides an additional aspect of upper limb assessment with good to excellent reliability and low SEM for patients with subacute stroke. High convergent validity with the ARA test and UE-FMA and discriminative validity were supported.

Male and female opinions about orthotic devices of the lower limb: A multicentre, observational study in patients with central neurological movement disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Because user-satisfaction and acceptance may partly determine the grade of compliance to an orthotic device (OD), the aim of this multicentre observational study was to inquire the reasons for acceptance and the user-satisfaction of an OD of the lower limb in male and female central neurological movement disorders (CNMD) patients. METHODS: Persons with CNMD having at least one prescribed OD of the lower limb were included. Two questionnaires were used: the MIRAD-ACCORT-II (reasons for acceptance) and a modified version of the D-QUEST 2.0 (user-satisfaction). Descriptive analyses were performed and to analyse the differences between the males' and females' answers Chi2- and Mann-Whitney U tests were used. RESULTS: Twenty-six stroke and 23 multiple sclerosis patients participated (53% males). "Comfort", "safety", "effectiveness" and "ease of use" were reported as most important aspects. 86% of the patients were (very) satisfied about their OD. Only for the aspect safety, compared to males, significant more females reported that if the OD is not safe enough they will not use it. CONCLUSION: For both, males and females, aspects related to comfort and functionality were reported as much more important than the esthetical aspects, and in general they are quite satisfied with the OD and the process of providing the OD. Orthopaedic technicians and health care providers can take these aspects into account when developing, constructing and providing OD's.

Rehabilitation of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation: effects of a mild treatment regime. A randomised controlled trial.

Closely examining the effects, optimal regime and time window of prism adaptation (PA) promotes guidelines for effective rehabilitation practice. The effects of short-term repetitive PA on spatial neglect manifestations were evaluated in patients with heterogeneous post-stroke delays, using a digital Visuospatial Neglect Test Battery. Subsequently, potential differences in PA effects between acute, subacute or chronic neglect were explored. A multicentre randomised controlled trial was conducted in 43 right-hemisphere neglect patients. They were treated with a mild PA regime: seven sessions of experimental or placebo prism training over 7-12 days. The outcome measures were diverse neglect variables related to peripersonal navigation, visual extinction, visuospatial memory, bisection, cancellation, drawing and visual search. The treatment effects were assessed after a short and a long time interval. Two to 24 hours after PA, conventional effects were found for drawing and centred bisection, and novel effects for peripersonal visuospatial navigation, visual extinction, and non-motor memory (with caution). No effects were found for visual search times and cancellation. The assessments after three months were still indicative of PA benefits for navigational, drawing and memory functions. PA did not prove to be more effective in acute, subacute or chronic patients. The extension of effects is theoretically framed within the debate about the levels of cognitive processing that are impacted by PA. Clinical suggestions are formulated regarding PA implementation in neglect treatment.

Effectiveness of additional trunk exercises on gait performance: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is lacking concerning the effect of additional trunk rehabilitation on gait performance. Investigating gait performance by both clinical and biomechanical outcome measures might lead to new scientific insights into the importance of the trunk during gait rehabilitation in people suffering from stroke. This protocol was written according to the SPIRIT 2013 Statement. METHODS AND DESIGN: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted in patients with impaired trunk control after stroke. A total of 60 patients will be randomly allocated to the control or the experimental group by means of sealed opaque envelopes. They will receive either 16 h of additional trunk exercises (experimental group) or cognitive exercises (controls) for 1 h a day, 4 days a week for 4 weeks. Patients will also receive 2 h of standard care consisting of physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Gait performance will be assessed clinically by the Tinetti Test and biomechanically by means of a full body gait analysis. In addition, the effect of the exercise protocol on the trunk itself and trunk activities of daily living will be assessed by the Trunk Impairment Scale and the Barthel Index. DISCUSSION: Despite the evidence demonstrating the importance of trunk control after stroke, studies about the effects of trunk rehabilitation on gait performance are inconsistent. In the current study, a more sophisticated treatment protocol will be used to enlarge therapeutic improvements, the relationship between clinical and biomechanical measures of gait performance can be investigated, and the sustainability of the effects of trunk exercises over time will be examined. Since clinical improvements are of greater importance to patients and physiotherapists, clinical assessment scales will be used as primary outcome measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02708888 . Registered on 2 March 2016.

Neurological patients and their lower limb orthotics: An observational pilot study about acceptance and satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Although an orthotic device of the lower limb improves the functionality of neurological patients, anecdotally clinical experience suggests that the compliance is rather limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the satisfaction and acceptance of a lower limb orthotic device. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative observational pilot study with a mix-method design. METHODS: Adult neurological patients who had a prescribed lower limb orthotic device were included. One published and clinically used questionnaire about satisfaction (D-Quest) and one ad hoc constructed questionnaire about acceptance of the orthotic device (MIRAD-ACCORT questionnaire) were used for data collection. RESULTS: In total, 33 patients participated (28 ankle-foot orthotic device, 3 knee-ankle-foot orthotic device and 2 other types). In general, they were satisfied about their orthotic device and the services. Less than one-fourth of the patients had some negative comments about the 'visual aspects' and the 'ability to hide' of their orthotic device. These, however, had a lower priority when compared with functionality, which was reported as a main advantage and is a reason for continuing the use of their orthotic device. CONCLUSION: Patients were satisfied in relation to their lower limb orthotic device. With regard to acceptance, it can be concluded that factors associated with functionality and comfort are more important than the aesthetic and psychological aspects of the orthotic device. Clinical relevance Patients were satisfied with their lower limb orthotic device. Some patients had some negative comments about the 'aesthetics aspects' and the 'ability to hide' their orthotic device. However, improvements in functionality were mostly reported as a main advantage and a reason for continuing the use of their orthotic device.

Proactive Response Inhibition and Subcortical Gray Matter Integrity in Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been associated with impairments in inhibiting prepotent motor responses triggered by infrequent external signals (ie, reactive inhibition). It is unclear whether proactive preparation to inhibit upcoming responses is also affected (ie, proactive inhibition). Successful inhibition relies on frontosubcortical interactions; therefore, impairments might be linked with gray matter atrophy in subcortical structures. OBJECTIVE: We investigated reactive and proactive inhibition in TBI and control groups, and their relationship with subcortical gray matter. METHODS: Participants performed a response inhibition task in which the probability of stopping was manipulated. Reactive inhibition was measured as the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) when the probability of stopping was low. Proactive inhibition was measured as the change in SSRT and in go response time with increasing probability of stopping. Subcortical gray matter structures were automatically segmented with FSL-FIRST. Group differences in subregional volume and associations with reactive and proactive inhibition efficiency were investigated using shape analysis. RESULTS: Reactive inhibition was impaired in TBI, as indicated by longer SSRTs. Moreover, the degree of atrophy in subregions of subcortical structures was predictive for SSRT in TBI. In contrast, proactive inhibition was not affected because both groups showed no response time slowing as a function of stopping probability. Proactive inhibition efficiency could be predicted by local volume in the anterior left putamen, bilateral pallidum, and right thalamus in controls but not in TBI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that proactive inhibition seems unaffected in TBI and that volume of subregions of subcortical nuclei is predictive for response inhibition proficiency and of clinical relevance in TBI.

Somatosensory Impairments in the Upper Limb Poststroke: Distribution and Association With Motor Function and Visuospatial Neglect.

BACKGROUND: A thorough understanding of the presence of different upper-limb somatosensory deficits poststroke and the relation with motor performance remains unclear. Additionally, knowledge about the relation between somatosensory deficits and visuospatial neglect is limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the distribution of upper-limb somatosensory impairments and the association with unimanual and bimanual motor outcomes and visuospatial neglect. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted, including 122 patients within 6 months after stroke (median = 82 days; interquartile range = 57-133 days). Somatosensory measurement included the Erasmus MC modification of the (revised) Nottingham Sensory Assessment (Em-NSA), Perceptual Threshold of Touch (PTT), thumb finding test, 2-point discrimination, and stereognosis subscale of the NSA. Upper-limb motor assessment comprised the Fugl-Meyer assessment, motricity index, Action Research Arm Test, and Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke. Screening for visuospatial neglect was performed using the Star Cancellation Test. RESULTS: Upper-limb somatosensory impairments were common, with prevalence rates ranging from 21% to 54%. Low to moderate Spearman ρ correlations were found between somatosensory and motor deficits (r = 0.22-0.61), with the strongest associations for PTT (r = 0.56-0.61) and stereognosis (r = 0.51-0.60). Visuospatial neglect was present in 27 patients (22%). Between-group analysis revealed somatosensory deficits that occurred significantly more often and more severely in patients with visuospatial neglect (P < .05). Results showed consistently stronger correlations between motor and somatosensory deficits in patients with visuospatial neglect (r = 0.44-0.78) compared with patients without neglect (r = 0.08-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Somatosensory impairments are common in subacute patients poststroke and are related to motor outcome. Visuospatial neglect was associated with more severe upper-limb somatosensory impairments.

Subcortical Volume Loss in the Thalamus, Putamen, and Pallidum, Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury, Is Associated With Motor Performance Deficits.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been associated with altered microstructural organization of white matter (WM) and reduced gray matter (GM). Although disrupted WM organization has been linked to poorer motor performance, the predictive value of GM atrophy for motor impairments in TBI remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Here, we investigated TBI-induced GM volumetric abnormalities and uniquely examined their relationship with bimanual motor impairments. METHODS: 22 moderate to severe TBI patients (mean age = 25.9 years, standard deviation [SD] = 4.9 years; time since injury = 4.7 years, SD = 3.7 years) and 27 age- and gender-matched controls (mean age = 23.4 years; SD = 3.8 years) completed bimanual tasks and a structural magnetic resonance imaging scan. Cortical and subcortical GM volumes were extracted and compared between groups using FreeSurfer. The association between bimanual performance and GM volumetric measures was investigated using partial correlations. RESULTS: Relative to controls, patients performed significantly poorer on the bimanual tasks and demonstrated significantly smaller total GM as well as overall and regional subcortical GM. However, the groups did not show significant differences in regional cortical GM volume. The majority of the results remained significant even after excluding TBI patients with focal lesions, suggesting that TBI-induced volume reductions were predominantly caused by diffuse injury. Importantly, atrophy of the thalamus, putamen, and pallidum correlated significantly with poorer bimanual performance within the TBI group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that GM atrophy is associated with motor impairments in TBI, providing new insights into the etiology of motor control impairments following brain trauma.