Inflammatory biomarker-based clinical practice in patients with pneumonia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Objectives: Biomarker-based clinical practice is currently gaining ground and increasingly affects decision making. A variety of biomarkers have been studied through the years and some of them have already an established role in modern medicine, such as procalcitonin (PCT) which has been proposed to reduce antibiotic exposure. We purposed to systematically review all biomarkers examined for guiding the clinical practice in patients with pneumonia. METHODS: A systematic review on PubMed was performed on April 2023 by two independent researchers using the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized trials which enrolled patients with pneumonia and compared biomarker-guided strategies to standard of care were included. RESULTS: 1242 studies were recorded, from whom 16 were eligible for this study. 14 studies investigated PCT as a biomarker. From these, 8 studies reported on community acquired pneumonia (CAP), 2 on ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), 1 on aspiration pneumonia, 1 on hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and 2 on exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD). There was 1 study, referred to VAP, that investigated interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) and 1 study that reported the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in ECOPD. In a total of 4751 patients in 15 studies, the biomarker-based approach did not lead to increased mortality [OR: 0.998 (95%CI: 0.74-1.34, p value: 0.991). I2:19%]. Among different types of pneumonia and time-points of assessment, biomarker-guided practice appeared to improve antibiotic-related outcomes, such as rate of antibiotic prescription, duration of antibiotic therapy and rate of antibiotic exposure, while 5 studies reported a possible decrease in antibiotic-related adverse effects. Biomarker-guided practice did not seem to lead in an increase in other adverse outcomes such as need for hospitalization and duration of hospitalization. However, the included studies have high risk of bias mainly due to improper blinding of participants/personnel and outcome assessors. CONCLUSION: Biomarker-guided clinical practice improves provided healthcare, in terms of reduced antibiotic consumption with no inferiority to mortality, relapses and exacerbations in patients with different types of pneumonia. Thus, such approaches should be further evaluated to achieve personalized medicine.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical and Nursing Students in a Greek University Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: the present study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of medical and nursing students at the University of Patras, western Greece, regarding sexually transmitted infections (STIs), sexual behavior and STI prevention measures, as well as the level of future healthcare professionals' education. METHOD: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 231 medical and nursing students (n = 106 medical, and n = 125 nursing) completed and returned the pre-tested study questionnaire. RESULTS: Most participants (77.5%) were females and46.1% were in the age group of 18-21 years. Syphilis, HIV/AIDS, and Hepatitis B were regarded as STIs by 65.8% of them. Medical students could predominantly list the widely known STIs compared to nursing students (p = 0.004). Regarding HIV/AIDS, 72.7% of the respondents reported that it is transmitted sexually and through blood transfusion. However, medical students were better informed than nursing students (p = 0.001). Medical students as well as students in the final year of their studies were found to be better informed about the vaccines available to prevent STIs. Regarding the question about what constitutes a risky sexual behavior, 71.4% answered sexual intercourse without the use of condom and 18.6% indicated having sex with an unknown partner. Most participants (69.7%) were satisfied with the education provided by their institution and no statistically significant difference was observed between medical and nursing students. Almost all students (97.8%) agreed that the course/subject of sex education must be included in school programs. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive analysis of knowledge and attitudes of Greek medical and nursing students regarding STIs, prevention measures and education level was conducted. The results of the present study could assist in the development of targeted training courses that can improve healthcare professionals' knowledge and ability to manage STIs.

An Updated Review on the Emerging Role of Indocyanine Green (ICG) as a Sentinel Lymph Node Tracer in Breast Cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care for clinically node-negative breast cancer and has recently been shown by clinical trials to be also feasible for clinically node-positive patients treated with primary systemic therapy. The dual technique using both radioisotope (RI) and blue dye (BD) as tracers for the identification of sentinel lymph nodes is considered the gold standard. However, allergic reactions to blue dye as well as logistics issues related to the use of radioactive agents, have led to research on new sentinel lymph node (SLN) tracers and to the development and introduction of novel techniques in the clinical practice. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a water-soluble dye with fluorescent properties in the near-infrared (NIR) spectrum. ICG has been shown to be safe and effective as a tracer during SLNB for breast cancer and accumulating evidence suggests that ICG is superior to BD and at least comparable to RI alone and to RI combined with BD. Thus, ICG was recently proposed as a reliable SLN tracer in some breast cancer clinical practice guidelines. Nevertheless, there is lack of consensus regarding the optimal role of ICG for SLN mapping. Specifically, it is yet to be determined whether ICG should be used in addition to BD and/or RI, or if ICG could potentially replace these long-established traditional SLN tracers. This article is an updated overview of somerecent studies that compared ICG with BD and/or RI regarding their accuracy and effectiveness during SLNB for breast cancer.

Oral Antibiotics for Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Bacteremia and endocarditis are two clinical syndromes that, for decades, were managed exclusively with parenteral antimicrobials, irrespective of a given patient's clinical condition, causative pathogen, or its antibiotic susceptibility profile. This clinical approach, however, was based on low-quality data and outdated expert opinions. When a patient's condition has improved, gastrointestinal absorption is not compromised, and an oral antibiotic regimen reaching adequate serum concentrations is available, a switch to oral antibacterials can be applied. Although available evidence has reduced the timing of the oral switch in bacteremia to three days/until clinical improvement, there are only scarce data regarding less than 10-day intravenous antibiotic therapy in endocarditis. Many standard or studied oral antimicrobial dosages are smaller than the approved doses for parenteral administration, which is a risk factor for treatment failure; in addition, the gastrointestinal barrier may affect drug bioavailability, especially when the causative pathogen has a minimum inhibitory concentration that is close to the susceptibility breakpoint. A considerable number of patients infected by such near-breakpoint strains may not be potential candidates for oral step-down therapy to non-highly bioavailable antibiotics like beta-lactams; different breakpoints should be determined for this setting. This review will focus on summarizing findings about pathogen-specific tailoring of oral step-down therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis, but will also present laboratory and clinical data about antibiotics such as beta-lactams, linezolid, and fosfomycin that should be studied more in order to elucidate their role and optimal dosage in this context.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Healthcare Workers towards Antibiotic Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Two Major Tertiary Hospitals in Western Greece.

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) and antimicrobial stewardship arethe two sides of the same coin that constitute a public health hydra. This study aimed to assessthe knowledge and attitude of healthcare workers (HCWs), on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in Western Greece. A total of 200 healthcare workers (doctors, nurses, and others) from the two largest tertiary hospitals in Western Greece were included in our survey. HCWs seem not to decide based on patient opinion in order to prescribe antibiotics. Approximately 97% of them are aware of their main adverse effects. Remarkably, 25% of respondents prescribe antibiotics due to diagnostic uncertainty, and 32.5% of them prescribe antibiotics based on their experience. HCWs statedthat they do not report adverse effects often. Inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions were mentioned as the main reason for bacterial resistance to antimicrobials. Monitoring the patient's treatment progress, using electronic prescriptions, and adhering to international guidelines were suggested as solutions to the problem. Post Hoc analysis showed that nursing staff apply to the national guidelines (p: 0.011) and use electronic prescriptions (p: 0.003) less often compared to consultants, doctor directors, and trainees. The findings of our survey may be useful for the development of future national education programs and interventions thatmay improve healthcare workers' knowledge and ability to manage antibiotics.

Knowledge and attitudes of medical students about clinical aspects of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Greece.

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most frequent cause of congenital infection worldwide causing severe morbidity in newborns, infants, and children. Despite the clinical importance of congenital CMV (cCMV) infection, studies conducted so far indicate that there is limited awareness in the medical community in the field. The aim of this study was to assess Greek medical students' knowledge on cCMV infection. Methods: We performed a questionnaire-based nationwide cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of medical students from seven medical schools was enrolled. Results: Of the 562 respondents, 54,8% considered themselves undereducated on cCMV infection. However, almost half of the participants could correctly recognize some basic principles of cCMV infection including ways of transmission, diagnosis and treatment, while there were aspects of cCMV infection with knowledge deficit. The year of study had a positive impact on the level of knowledge with students of higher years of study being of more sufficient education on the specific topic. Conclusion: Overall, our study indicates a discrepancy between self-reported awareness and the level of knowledge among medical students in Greece. Further educational opportunities about cCMV should be offered, particularly in areas of the curriculum involving the care of women and children. Establishing medical students' solid background on the disease burden and educating them about preventative strategies for at-risk populations, should be the main pillars of such efforts in order to promote confidence in managing these cases in their future professional careers.

Presepsin in the diagnosis of sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by organ dysfunction. It occurs due to the host's dysregulated response to an infection. Clinicians use inflammatory biomarkers to evaluate patients at risk of sepsis in various settings. METHODS: We included studies focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in patients under suspicion of sepsis. The bivariate model of Reitsma was used for the quantitative synthesis, and summary estimates were calculated. The Zhou-Dendukuri approach was followed to assess heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed based on settings and diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The summary sensitivity for diagnosing sepsis was 0.805 (95 % CI: 0.759-0.844), while the false positive rate (FPR) was 0.174 (95 % CI: 0.124-0.239). The area under the curve (AUC) for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.875, with a slightly lower partial AUC of 0.833. The analysis using the Zhou-Dendukuri approach revealed low heterogeneity (I2 = 15.9 %). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in SROC curves and summary estimates between the ED and ICU settings, although the ED subgroup exhibited higher heterogeneity (I2 = 52.7 % vs. 20.2 %). The comparison between the diagnostic criteria, Sepsis 1 and Sepsis 3, demonstrated similar summary estimates and SROC curves. The examination of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool revealed a high risk of bias regarding the participants and their applicability. Also, there was an increased risk of bias in all the studies concerning the index test. CONCLUSION: Based on our research, presepsin is a promising biomarker for triage and early diagnosis of sepsis.

The Role of the Pancreatic Stone Protein in Predicting Intra-Abdominal Infection-Related Complications: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) is an acute-phase protein that is mainly secreted by pancreatic cells in response to stress. The current literature supports its use as a predictor of sepsis. Its prognostic role has recently been evaluated in a point-of-care setting, mostly in high-risk patients. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate its utility in the prognosis of patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection. METHODS: Adult patients consecutively admitted to the Internal Medicine Department of the University Hospital of Patras, Greece, with a diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection were enrolled. PSP levels were measured within 24 h of admission in whole blood. RESULTS: a total of 40 patients were included after being diagnosed with IAI. PSP was used as an independent predictive factor for sepsis after adjusting for age with OR = 7.888 (95% CI: 1.247-49.890). PSP also predicted readmission and the need for treatment escalation (p: <0.01) and was an excellent prognostic factor regarding these outcomes (AUC = 0.899, 95% CI: 0.794-1.0, and AUC = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.748-0.976, respectively). PSP also proved superior to CRP, ferritin, and fibrinogen in sepsis diagnosis, treatment escalation, and readmission prediction with an AUC of 0.862, 0.698, and 0.899, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSP can predict unfavorable outcomes, such as sepsis development, readmission, and the need for treatment escalation among patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Efficacy of Fosfomycin-Containing Regimens for Treatment of Bacteremia Due to Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Series Study.

Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) has evolved over the last decades as a major problem in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative nosocomial infections, associated with high mortality rates especially in the intensive care unit (ICU). Recent reports highlight the increasing prevalence of resistance to colistin, a last resort therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant AB. We retrospectively evaluated the characteristics, treatment regimens and outcomes of twenty patients with pan-drug resistant (PDR) AB primary bacteremia hospitalized in the ICU of the University General Hospital of Patras, during a two-year period (October 2020-September 2022). The 28-day mortality reached 50%. Between survivors and non-survivors, no differences were found regarding age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). However, non-survivors had higher APACHE II scores and higher prevalence of septic shock and COVID-19 infection. A significantly higher percentage in the survivor group received Fosfomycin as part of the combination regimen. Inclusion of fosfomycin in the combination therapeutic regimen was associated with significantly better survival as compared to non-fosfomycin-containing regimens. In view of the increasing prevalence of PDR-AB infections in ICUs, its associated high rates of mortality and the lack of effective treatment options, the observed survival benefit with fosfomycin inclusion in the therapeutic regimen merits further validation in larger prospective studies.

Tocilizumab versus baricitinib in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19: an open label, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials comparing tocilizumab and baricitinib in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are needed. This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial aiming to address this unmet need. METHODS: To determine whether baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab, we assessed whether the upper boundary of the two-sided 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) did not exceed 1.50. The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death by day 28. Secondary outcomes included time to hospital discharge by day 28 and change in WHO progression scale at day 10. RESULTS: We assigned 251 patients with COVID-19 and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of <200 to receive either tocilizumab (n = 126) or baricitinib (n = 125) plus standard of care. Baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab for the primary composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death by day 28 (mechanical ventilation or death for patients who received baricitinib, 39.2% [n = 49/125]; mechanical ventilation or death for patients who received tocilizumab, 44.4% [n = 56/126]; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56-1.21; p 0.001 for non-inferiority). Baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab for the time to hospital discharge within 28 days (patients who received baricitinib- discharged alive: 58.4% [n = 73/125] vs. patients who received tocilizumab- discharged alive: 52.4% [n = 66/126]; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.61-1.18; p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). There was no significant difference between the baricitinib and tocilizumab arms in the change in WHO scale at day 10 (0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-1.0]; p 0.83). DISCUSSION: In the setting of this trial, baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab with regards to the composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death by day 28 and the time to discharge by day 28 in patients with severe COVID-19.

Burnout Among Healthcare Workers During Covid-19 Pandemic: Results from Seven Hospitals in Western Greece.

Background: Burnout is increasingly being recognized as a major concern, affecting the physical and mental well-being of Healthcare workers (HCWs). Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence of occupational exhaustion in healthcare workers (doctors, nurses, paramedics, assistants, administrative staff) and possible contributing factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study was conducted from March to September 2022 in seven (7) hospitals in Western Greece. It was carried out using an anonymous questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed based on results of previously published studies and consisted of 22 multiple-choice questions. Results: There were 259 (60.2%) female and 178 (39.8%) male participants enrolled in the study. The majority of the respondents were nurses (n=207, 48.1%), followed by doctors (n+ 178, 41.4%). There was a marked increase in emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal fulfillment and pandemic-related total burnout in participants older than 61 years old (40,05±2,2, 27,16±1,0, 21,11±4,1, 88,32±4,3, respectively). Widow/ers healthcare workers were mostly affected from pandemic related burnout compared to married, unmarried, and divorced healthcare workers. Respondents without postgraduate education demonstrated significantly greater prevalence of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and pandemic-related total burnout in comparison to those with doctoral/master degree. The prevalence of personal and work-related burnout among paramedics and administrative staff was higher than that seen in doctors and nurses(32,82±3,8 vs32,08±5,0/29,11±4,7 22,33±4,0 vs21,57±3,1/18,89±5,4 19,60±3,9 vs17,26±2,8/15,24±3,7 74,76±10,4 vs70,92±9,5/63,23±12,1).The prevalence of emotional exhaustion and work-related total burnout was significantly higher among doctors, nurses, paramedics, and administrative staff working with direct contact with COVID-19 patients than those among healthcare workers working without direct contact with COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: The present study highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers.

Alterations in Laboratory Parameters Related to Disease Severity in Vaccinated Patients Against SARS-CoV-2.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide with global financial and health care systems consequences. It is already well recognized that immunization against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a precondition for blocking mutations and prevent the emergence of variants. The aim of the study was to investigate the possible relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and the commonly used disease-related blood biomarkers. Methods: Adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were hospitalized from November 8, 2021, to December 31, 2021, were included. The retrospective study was conducted in Patras University Hospital, Greece. Two groups of patients were assessed, the ones who were previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (group A, n = 21), and those who were not (group B, n = 55). After analysis of peripheral blood, we calculated on admission day for each patient the total white blood cell (WBC), absolute lymphocytes count (ALC), absolute monocyte count, D-dimers, C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma levels, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, high-sensitive troponin, as well as the arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen (PO2/FiO2) ratio. Results: The median age of all patients was 65.3 ± 15.2 years old; 68.4% were men and 31.6% were women. Comorbidities were present in 51 patients (67.1%). Hypertension and diabetes were observed as the most common comorbidities (33.3%). About 72.4% of the patients were unvaccinated or have received the first dose of vaccine, and 27.6% were completely vaccinated. No statistical difference was found in the total WBC count and ALC between the two groups (group A vs. group B: 8,168.95 ± 7,584.4 vs. 8,521.9 ± 6,571.3, P = 0.848 and 3,052.1 ± 7,230.7 vs. 1,279.6 ± 1,218.6, P = 0.087). Monocytes count in both groups did not show statistical difference: group A vs. group B: 672.6 ± 384.7 vs. 637.9 ± 477.8 (P = 0.754). Similarly, no difference for D-dimers (1,348.5 ± 1,397.6 vs. 1,850.9 ± 3,877.5, P = 0.575), ferritin (1,082.8 ± 1,399.5 vs. 1,327.4 ± 1,307.8, P = 0.508), high-sensitive troponin (113.6 ± 318.1 vs. 157.5 ± 48.8, P = 0.252), and CRP (6.92 ± 4.9 vs. 7.4 ± 5.9, P = 0.732). For LDH plasma levels, the statistical difference was significant (274.2 ± 85.6 vs. 387.5 ± 223.4, P = 0.003), as well as for the PO2/FiO2 ratio (355.6 ± 129.7 vs. 260.5 ± 123.3, P = 0,006). Conclusions: In a mixed population hospitalized for COVID-19, only LDH plasma levels and the PaO2/FiO2 on admission day showed statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Although unvaccinated patients are more likely to develop severe illness, they did not express significantly higher values of commonly used plasma biomarkers such as ferritin, CRP, and D-dimers which are related to disease severity.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical and Nursing Students in Greece Regarding Child Abuse and Neglect.

Data on the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare practitioners in training regarding child abuse and neglect (CAN) are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes regarding CAN of medical and nursing students in Greek universities. We performed a questionnaire-based e-survey on a convenience sample of students and recruited 609 students (366 medical and 243 nursing). An unsatisfactory level of knowledge in the field was reported overall. Most of the students (92.2%) were aware of their future responsibility to protect vulnerable children and report suspected cases of CAN; at the same time, they were willing to obtain further education. Based on the above, appropriate training in the undergraduate curriculum should be developed in order to strengthen future healthcare practitioners and boost their confidence in dealing with suspected cases of CAN and protect children's welfare.

The Chemokines CXC, CC and C in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19 Disease and as Surrogates of Vaccine-Induced Innate and Adaptive Protective Responses.

COVID-19 is one of the progressive viral pandemics that originated from East Asia. COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 has been shown to be associated with a chain of physio-pathological mechanisms that are basically immunological in nature. In addition, chemokines have been proposed as a subgroup of chemotactic cytokines with different activities ranging from leukocyte recruitment to injury sites, irritation, and inflammation to angiostasis and angiogenesis. Therefore, researchers have categorized the chemotactic elements into four classes, including CX3C, CXC, CC, and C, based on the location of the cysteine motifs in their structures. Considering the severe cases of COVID-19, the hyperproduction of particular chemokines occurring in lung tissue as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines significantly worsen the disease prognosis. According to the studies conducted in the field documenting the changing expression of CXC and CC chemokines in COVID-19 cases, the CC and CXC chemokines contribute to this pandemic, and their impact could reflect the development of reasonable strategies for COVID-19 management. The CC and the CXC families of chemokines are important in host immunity to viral infections and along with other biomarkers can serve as the surrogates of vaccine-induced innate and adaptive protective responses, facilitating the improvement of vaccine efficacy. Furthermore, the immunogenicity elicited by the chemokine response to adenovirus vector vaccines may constitute the basis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia.

SARS CoV-2-Induced Viral Sepsis: The Role of Gut Barrier Dysfunction.

A considerable proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 meet Sepsis-3 criteria and share common pathophysiological mechanisms of multiorgan injury with bacterial sepsis, in absence of secondary bacterial infections, a process characterized as "viral sepsis". The intestinal barrier exerts a central role in the pathophysiological sequence of events that lead from SARS-CoV-2 infection to severe systemic complications. Accumulating evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 disrupts the integrity of the biological, mechanical and immunological gut barrier. Specifically, microbiota diversity and beneficial bacteria population are reduced, concurrently with overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria (dysbiosis). Enterocytes' tight junctions (TJs) are disrupted, and the apoptotic death of intestinal epithelial cells is increased leading to increased gut permeability. In addition, mucosal CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, Th17 cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells and macrophages are activated, and T-regulatory cells are decreased, thus promoting an overactivated immune response, which further injures the intestinal epithelium. This dysfunctional gut barrier in SARS-CoV-2 infection permits the escape of luminal bacteria, fungi and endotoxin to normally sterile extraintestinal sites and the systemic circulation. Pre-existing gut barrier dysfunction and endotoxemia in patients with comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes and immunosuppression predisposes to aggravated endotoxemia. Bacterial and endotoxin translocation promote the systemic inflammation and immune activation, which characterize the SARS-CoV-2 induced "viral sepsis" syndrome associated with multisystemic complications of severe COVID-19.

High-Flow vs. Low-Flow Nasal Cannula in Reducing Hypoxemic Events During Bronchoscopic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygenation method has been proven to be successful in oxygenation of patients with respiratory failure and has exhibited clinical superiority compared to low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC). Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the potential favorable impact of HFNC oxygenation during bronchoscopy and related procedures like endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration. Only randomized control trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. Results: Six randomized control trials with 1,170 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients who underwent bronchoscopy with the use of high-flow nasal cannula experienced less hypoxemic events/desaturations, less procedural interruptions and pneumothoraxes compared to patients under low-flow nasal cannula treatment. This beneficial effect of HFNC in hypoxemic events was persistent 10 min after the end of procedure. Conclusion: The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygenation method could reduce hypoxemic events and related peri- and post-bronchoscopic complications.

High-flow versus conventional nasal cannula oxygen supplementation therapy and risk of hypoxia in gastrointestinal endoscopies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) represents a mainstay diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in clinical practice. Hypoxemia constitutes a major complication for endoscopists. Emerging evidence supports the utilization of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) over conventional nasal cannula (CNC) for avoidance of hypoxemia. Our aim was to compare the hypoxemia risk in patients undergoing GIE with HFNC versus CNC oxygen supplementation recruited by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched in medical databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify RCTs investigating the abovementioned association. Enrolled studies were evaluated for risk of bias and inserted into a random effects model for meta-analysis; subgroup analyses and publication bias were also assessed. RESULTS: Out of 271 articles, five RCTs were eligible (patients n=2656, HFNC 1299 and CNC 1357). A statistically significant reduced relative risk (RR) of hypoxemia among HFNC patients was revealed (RR=0.18, CI95%: 0.05-0.61), whilst with high heterogeneity (I2:79.94%, p<0.01). Patients undergoing upper GIE with HFNC displayed a significantly lower hypoxemia risk (96%, p<0.001, I2:15.59%), even after exclusion of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases (RR:0.03, CI95%:0.01-0.21), albeit with higher heterogeneity (I2:41.82%).    . CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing upper GIE with HFNC experience significantly less hypoxemia burden than CNC counterparts. Further research is warranted to target optimal safety during endoscopy.Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; BMI, Body Mass Index; CI, confidence interval; CNC, conventional nasal cannula; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; FiO2, fraction of inspired O2; GI, gastrointestinal; GIE, gastrointestinal endoscopies; HFNC, High-Flow nasal cannula; ICU, intensive care unit; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis; RCTs, randomized control trials; RR, relative risk (or risk ratio).

The Role of High Flow Nasal Oxygen in the Management of Severe COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Oxygen therapy remains the cornerstone for managing patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and several modalities of non-invasive ventilation are used worldwide. High-flow oxygen via nasal canula is one therapeutic option which may in certain cases prevent the need of mechanical ventilation. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Library until April 2021 using the following search terms: "high flow oxygen and COVID-19" and "high flow nasal and COVID-19". RESULTS: Twenty-three articles were included in this review, in four of which prone positioning was used as an adjunctive measure. Most of the articles were cohort studies or case series. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy was associated with a reduced need for invasive ventilation compared to conventional oxygen therapy and led to an improvement in secondary clinical outcomes such as length of stay. The efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy was comparable to that of other non-invasive ventilation options, but its tolerability is likely higher. Failure of this modality was associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: High flow nasal oxygen is an established option for respiratory support in COVID-19 patients. Further investigation is required to quantify its efficacy and utility in preventing the requirement of invasive ventilation.

Introdução: A oxigenoterapia continua a ser o pilar do tratamento de doentes com infecção grave por SARS-CoV-2 e várias modalidades de ventilação não invasiva são usadas em todo o mundo. O oxigénio de alto fluxo via cânula nasal é uma opção terapêutica que pode, em certos casos, evitar a necessidade de ventilação mecânica. Material e Métodos: Realizámos uma pesquisa sistemática da literatura nas bases de dados PubMed e Cochrane Library até abril de 2021 usando os seguintes termos de pesquisa: "oxigénio de alto fluxo e COVID-19" e "alto fluxo nasal e COVID-19". Resultados: Vinte e três artigos foram incluídos nesta revisão, em quatro dos quais a posição de decúbito ventral foi usada como medida adjuvante. A maioria dos artigos eram estudos de coorte ou séries de casos. A oxigenoterapia nasal de alto fluxo pode reduzir a necessidade de ventilação invasiva em comparação com a oxigenoterapia convencional e pode melhorar os resultados clínicos. A eficácia da oxigenoterapia nasal de alto fluxo é comparável à de outras opções de ventilação não invasiva, embora a sua tolerabilidade seja provavelmente superior. O insucesso dessa modalidade está associado ao aumento da mortalidade. Conclusão: O oxigénio nasal de alto fluxo é uma opção estabelecida para suporte respiratório em doentescom COVID-19. É necessária investigação adicional para medir a sua eficácia e utilidade na prevenção da necessidade de ventilação invasiva.

Teleneurology in a center for neuromuscular diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has urged the adoption of telemedicine services as a measure of greater patients' safety. This study aims to investigate efficacy and feasibility of teleneurology care for patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMD). METHODS: All patient visits from 4th March 2020 to 27th March 2021, the period of COVID-19 lockdown requiring partial transition to tele-consultation, were reviewed. Demographic data and medical records during the implementation of the "hybrid model" of both remote and in-person visits during COVID-19 era were analyzed and compared to those of the pre-pandemic era. RESULTS: A total of 2179 tele-consultation contacts for 182 patients (mean age 46.4 years, 42.3% female) were conducted. Tele-consultation was primarily performed by telephone calls. During that period, 1745 telephone calls were conducted, resulting in a 4.5 mean increase/patient compared to 2019. There was a 15.1% decrease in first time in-person consultations compared to 2019. However, the mean number of monitoring visits per person during pandemic was no different from previous years. With the exception of 3 patients with advanced stage of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, no other patients required an unscheduled appointment or hospitalization for unforeseen reasons related to tele-consultation restrictions. CONCLUSION: Monitoring of NMD patients could benefit from tele-provided multidisciplinary services. The experience gained during COVID-19 pandemic could be useful for further development of tele-medicine.

Evaluation of Plasma Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Levels in Patients With COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Pneumonia: An Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The respiratory system is the main system affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and a great number of infected people need hospitalization. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker indicative of acute and chronic inflammation. Current literature supports that suPAR has great predictive ability for mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to compare the value of suPAR and other laboratory biomarkers in patients with chest infection and suspected COVID-19. METHODS: A total of 41 consecutive patients with chest infection were enrolled in the study and were assigned into two groups according to the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result for SARS-CoV-2. The two groups had no significant difference in baseline data (age, sex), arterial oxygen partial pressure (PO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio and mortality. RESULTS: Among patients with chest infection who required hospitalization, suPAR was significantly higher on admission in those with COVID-19 when compared to patients with non-COVID-19. suPAR had a great prognostic ability for in-hospital mortality in the COVID-19 subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: A single measurement of suPAR on admission can provide prognostic information for patients with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia. In the subgroup of patients with positive real-time PCR result for SARS-CoV2, suPAR was significantly higher and had an excellent prognostic value for the in-hospital mortality.