Effect of an Ovsynch56 protocol initiated at different intervals after insemination with or without a presynchronizing injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on fertility in lactating dairy cows.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate effects of 2 resynchronization protocols beginning at different intervals after artificial insemination (AI) on the pattern of return to estrus, ovarian responses, and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) to reinsemination. Lactating cows from 2 dairies, located in Texas (n=2,233) and Minnesota (n=3,077), were assigned to 1 of 4 timed AI (TAI) protocols 17 ± 3 d after AI. All cows were examined for pregnancy 31 ± 3 d after previous AI. Cows assigned to early Ovsynch56 (E-OV56) or OV56 received the Ovsynch56 protocol starting 24 or 31 d after AI, respectively. Cows assigned to early GnRH-GnRH-PGF(2α)-GnRH (E-GGPG) or GGPG received a presynchronizing GnRH injection 17 or 24 d after AI, respectively, 7 d before the start of the Ovsynch56 protocol. Cows observed in estrus after enrollment were inseminated on the same day. Ovaries were examined and blood was sampled for progesterone concentration on the day of first GnRH and PGF(2α) injection of the Ovsynch56 protocol. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 31 and 66 d after resynchronized AI. On the day of the first GnRH injection of the TAI, a higher percentage of cows on E-GGPG and GGPG protocols had a corpus luteum (E-GGPG=83.8, GGPG=91.2, E-OV56=80.4, and OV56=75.5%) and progesterone concentration >1 ng/mL (E-GGPG=62.5, GGPG=76.0, E-OV56=53.6, and OV56=60.8%) than cows assigned to other protocols. However, the percentage of cows ovulating to the first GnRH injection of TAI was not affected by treatment. Fewer E-GGPG and more OV56 cows were reinseminated in estrus (E-GGPG=23.7, GGPG=49.0, E-OV56=41.6, and OV56=57.6%). Treatment did not affect P/AI at 31 or 66 d for cows reinseminated in estrus. However, cows reinseminated in estrus had greater P/AI at 31 (40.0 vs. 27.5%) and 66 d (36.0 vs. 23.9%) than cows completing the TAI protocols. Among cows completing the TAI protocols, initiation of GGPG at 24 d after AI increased, whereas initiation of Ovsynch56 at 24 d after AI decreased P/AI at 31 d after reinsemination (E-GGPG=30.6, GGPG=28.3.0, E-OV56=22.3, and OV56=28.7%). Pregnancy per AI did not differ across treatment at 66 d after TAI (E-GGPG=26.6, GGPG=24.4, E-OV56=20.0, and OV56=24.1%). Overall, type of resynchronization protocol and protocol initiation time did not affect P/AI 66 d after reinsemination (E-GGPG=29.7, GGPG=30.5, E-OV56=26.1, and OV56=30.4%). In conclusion, GGPG resynchronization protocols and initiation of resynchronization protocol 24 d after AI reduced the number of cows reinseminated in estrus but neither the timing of initiation of resynchronization nor presynchronization with GnRH affected overall P/AI.

Supplemental progesterone and timing of resynchronization on pregnancy outcomes in lactating dairy cows.

The objective was to determine the effect of exogenous progesterone (P4) in a timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol initiated at 2 different times post-AI on pregnancies per AI (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. Cows (n=1,982) in 5 dairy herds were assigned randomly at a nonpregnancy diagnosis 32 ± 3 d post-AI to 1 of 4 resynchronization (RES) treatments arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial design using the Ovsynch-56 (GnRH, 7d later PGF2α, 56 h later GnRH, 16 h later TAI) protocol. Treatments were as follows: cows initiating RES 32 ± 3 d after AI with no supplemental P4 (d 32 RES-CON; n=516); same as d 32 RES-CON plus a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert containing P4 at the onset of Ovsynch-56 (d 32 RES-CIDR; n=503); cows initiating RES 39 ± 3 d after AI (d 39 RES-CON; n=494); and same as d 39 RES-CON plus a CIDR (d 39 RES-CIDR; n=491). Cows were inseminated if observed in estrus before TAI. The P/AI was determined 32 and 60 d after TAI. In a subgroup of cows (n=1,152), blood samples were collected and ovarian structures examined by ultrasonography on the days of the first GnRH (G1) and PGF2α of Ovsynch-56. Percentage of cows with a corpus luteum (CL) at G1 was unaffected by timing of treatments, but percentage of cows with a CL at PGF2α was greater for d 32 than for d 39 cows (87.9 vs. 79.4%). In addition, percentage of cows with P4 ≥ 1 ng/mL at G1 was unaffected by timing of treatments, but was increased for d 32 compared with d 39 RES cows on the day of the PGF2α of the RES protocols (86.5 vs. 74.3%). Treatment did not affect ovulation to G1 or P/AI 32 d after RES TAI (d 32 RES-CON=30.1%, d 32 RES-CIDR=28.8%, d 39 RES-CON=27.5%, d 39 RES-CIDR=30.5%). A greater percentage of d 39 RES cows underwent premature luteolysis during the RES protocol compared with d 32 RES cows. An interaction was detected between day of RES initiation and CIDR treatment, in which the CIDR increased P/AI 60 d after TAI for d 39 (CON=23.7% vs. CIDR=28.0%), but not for d 32 (CON=26.9% and CIDR=24.2%) cows. Pregnancy loss was unaffected by treatment. In addition, cows had improved P/AI 60 d after TAI when they received a CIDR and did not have a CL (CON-CL=28.2%, CON-No CL=19.2%, CIDR-CL=27.0%, and CIDR-No CL=26.5%) or had P4 <1 ng/mL (CON-High P4=27.8%, CON-Low P4=15.0%, CIDR-High P4=25.0%, and CIDR-Low P4=29.4%) at G1, but not if a CL was present or P4 was ≥ 1 ng/mL at G1. In conclusion, addition of a CIDR insert to supplement P4 during the RES protocol increased P/AI for cows initiating RES 39 ± 3 d after AI but not 32 ± 3 d after AI.