Use of a Spinal Needle Through the Deep Rotator Cuff Tissue to Treat Rotator Cuff Tears Under Direct Articular Vision.

Achieving sufficient attachment of deep rotator cuff tissue to the footprint area on the greater tubercle of the humerus is essential for functional recovery, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. We introduce a surgical technique for rotator cuff tear repair using a spinal needle to penetrate deep rotator cuff tissue under direct arthroscopic visualization. After trimming the torn edge, an arthroscope is inserted into the joint cavity through a posterior portal, and a hole is drilled into the humeral head cartilage margin using an upper approach, facilitating the implantation of an internal shoulder row nail. A spinal needle is used to introduce a No. 2 polydioxanone (PDS; Johnson & Johnson) line through sufficient deep rotator cuff tissue. Graspers are then used to extract the stitch and PDS together through the anterolateral opening. Once the PDS is knotted, the stitch is introduced into the rotator cuff. This process is replicated to insert additional stitches into the rotator cuff. Our proposed technique, involving a spinal needle under direct visualization, ensures sufficient coverage of the deep rotator cuff tissue over the footprint area and promotes the healing of the repaired rotator cuff. This method is safe, effective, convenient, and reproducible.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Combined with Complete Radial Tear of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: Suture or Resection?

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture often presents with a tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. There is no clear preference between ACL reconstruction with suture and resection of the meniscus. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of ACL reconstruction with suture versus resection in patients presenting with arthroscopic ACL rupture and radial complete tear of the posterior corner of the lateral meniscus. We retrospectively analyzed 157 patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Between May 2010 and April 2015, 86 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus suture (study group, 54.78%) and 71 of 157 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus resection (control group, 45.22%) in our department. All patients were monitored over the 12 to 72-month follow-up period. The primary evaluation indices were the Lysholm scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, pivot shift test, the Barret criteria, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of meniscal healing. The majority of 157 patients were relatively young men (29.64 ± 7.79 years) with low body mass index (BMI) (23.79 ± 2.74). The postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores of the two groups were significantly improved over the corresponding preoperative scores (p < 0.05). The clinical results and excellent and good rates were significantly better for the study group than for the control group (both, p < 0.05). MRI showed that the meniscal healed rate of the study group was 96.51%. There was no significant difference in BMI between subgroups for any functional outcome. For patients with ACL rupture and complete radial tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, ACL reconstruction and both simultaneous suture and resection of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus were found to be safe and effective. There was no association between outcomes and BMI. However, the former was associated with a superior long-term clinical effect and may restore the integrity of the meniscus and is particularly recommended for young patients.

Comparison of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture in the treatment of osteochondral lesion of talus.

Objective: This study was performed to compare the clinical effect of arthroscopic debridement vs. arthroscopic microfracture in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with osteochondral lesion of talus who were admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to April 2021. The patients were divided into Group A (arthroscopic debridement group, n = 39) and Group B (arthroscopic microfracture group, n = 42), and the intraoperative details in the two groups were analyzed. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were compared between the two groups before surgery and at the last follow-up. Results: The postoperative AOFAS score (Group A, 40.9-82.26; Group B, 38.12-87.38), VAS score (Group A, 6.44-3.92; Group B, 6.38-2.05) significantly improved in both groups, but the improvement was significantly greater in Group B than in Group A (P < 0.05). Among all patients, the AOFAS and VAS scores of men aged ≤30 years and patients with a low body mass index (BMI) improved more significantly (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The arthroscopic microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral lesion of talus is superior to joint debridement in terms of improving ankle function, especially in relatively young men with a relatively low BMI.

Outcomes of and factors influencing the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff injury with the patient in the lateral-lying and beach chair positions.

ABSTRACT: To compare the postoperative effects of arthroscopy for rotator cuff injury with patients in the lateral-lying position (LLP) and beach chair position (BCP), and to identify factors influencing these effects.Data from patients with rotator cuff injuries who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the LLP (n = 115, 53.24%) or BCP (n = 101, 46.76%) between January 2013 and 2016 and were followed for >3 years were analyzed. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score (UCLASS), and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate patients' shoulder function and pain preoperatively and at the last follow-up examination. The abduction and lateral rotation angles were measured. The influences of patient characteristics were compared between the LLP and BCP subgroups defined by UCLASSs (excellent, good, acceptable, poor).Postoperative injury characteristics, UCLASSs, and VAS scores were better in the LLP group than in the BCP group (all P < .05). Among patients with good UCLASSs, preoperative pain duration was longer in the LLP group than in the BCP group (P < .05); among those with acceptable UCLASSs, this duration was longer in the BCP group than in the LLP group (P < .05). The preoperative flexion angle differed between groups (P < .05). Among patients with excellent and good UCLASSs, the postoperative external rotation angle was greater in the LLP group than in the BCP group (P < .05). The LLP group contained more excellent UCLASSs than did the BCP group (P < .05). It also contained more small, medium, and large tear cases than did the BCP group (all P < .05).The effect of arthroscopy for rotator cuff injury was better when the operation was performed with the patient in the LLP. Either position is suitable for the arthroscopic treatment of partial rotator cuff tears. The LLP is more suitable in cases of small and medium-sized tears and those with large preoperative lateral rotation angles. The BCP should be used for patients with large preoperative flexion angles.