Pharmacokinetic Characterization of a Prototype Mini Nicotine Lozenge.

INTRODUCTION: Cigarette smoking remains a substantial public health problem. Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is an effective treatment that increases the success of a quit attempt. There are different NRT formats with no difference in efficacy, but their pharmaceutical form or route of administration may translate into individual preferences. A novel prototype mini lozenge was developed to offer smokers a new NRT option to aid in their quit attempt. Two studies were conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters and to evaluate its bioequivalence to a commercially available nicotine mini lozenge. METHODS: Two randomized, open-label, crossover studies were conducted to evaluate either the 2 or 4 mg dose level. Heavy smokers in otherwise good health were randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences: the prototype mini lozenge followed by a commercially available mini lozenge, or the converse. After a 5 to 7 day washout period, subjects crossed over to receive the other study treatment. Blood sampling occurred pre- and post-dose nicotine and was assessed using a validated solid-phase extraction with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. The primary endpoint was bioequivalence as determined by maximal plasma nicotine concentration (Cmax) and the extent of nicotine absorption (AUC0-t and AUC0-∞). The secondary endpoints included the time to Cmax (Tmax), half-life, the elimination constant (Kel), and safety. RESULTS: The prototype mini lozenge was bioequivalent to the commercially available mini lozenge, with no significant difference in Cmax, AUC0-t, or AUC0-∞ or any of the secondary outcomes. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was throat irritation, of which all cases were mild in severity. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The prototype mini lozenge is bioequivalent to a commercially available mini lozenge and may provide smokers with a new oral NRT option to aid in smoking cessation and of tobacco dependence through the relief of nicotine withdrawal symptoms, including cravings.

Efficacy and safety of topical diclofenac/menthol gel for ankle sprain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial.

Purpose This study was performed to evaluate topical 1% diclofenac/3% menthol gel in treating ankle sprain. Design In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adolescents and adults with acute ankle sprain (N = 385) applied 4 g of gel containing 1% diclofenac/3% menthol (n = 117), 1% diclofenac (n = 112), 3% menthol (n = 77), or placebo (n = 75) four times daily. The primary outcome was the area under the curve of pain intensity (PI) on movement [0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain)] from 24 to 72 hours post-application (AUC1-3 days). Secondary outcomes included pain relief (PR); PI; time to onset of PR, meaningful PR, cooling, and complete recovery; PI difference; sum of PI difference; total PR; reduction in ankle swelling; and the patient's global assessment of response to treatment. Results There were no statistically significant differences in AUC1-3 between 1% diclofenac/3% menthol and placebo, diclofenac, or menthol gels and no meaningful advantages of 1% diclofenac/3% menthol for any secondary outcome. There was a higher incidence of skin and application-site events with 1% diclofenac/3% menthol than with placebo or 1% diclofenac. Conclusion No significant improvement was observed with topical 1% diclofenac/3% menthol gel compared with placebo, 1% diclofenac, or 3% menthol gel in treating pain from ankle sprain. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT02100670.