Preoperative Mental Health Score and Postoperative Outcome After Hallux Valgus Surgery.

BACKGROUND:: Preoperative mental health status as a predictor of operative outcome has been a growing area of interest. In this paper, the correlation between preoperative mental health status and postoperative functional outcome following scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction was explored. METHODS:: Parameters were tabulated preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. They included the Short Form 36 (SF-36), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot score, hallux valgus angle (HVA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) measurements and the visual analog score (VAS) to quantify pain. SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) score was used as a surrogate for patient's mental health status. Seventy-six consecutive cases were analyzed at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. RESULTS:: There were significant improvements in all 8 domains of the SF-36, with the mean MCS score increasing from 52.3 ± 7.6 preoperatively to 55.7 ± 6.8 postoperatively. Preoperative MCS scores were not correlated to changes in AOFAS score, PCS score, VAS pain score, HVA or IMA. Preoperative MCS was observed to be correlated to postoperative AOFAS ( r = 0.381, P = .001) and PCS score ( r = 0.315, P = .006). Patients with a preoperative MCS score ⩾50 had a statistically higher postoperative AOFAS and PCS score than patients with MCS score <50. There was no correlation between preoperative MCS scores and improvements in radiologic parameters. There was also no correlation between the improvements in radiologic parameters and improvements in both the AOFAS and VAS pain scores. CONCLUSION:: Preoperative mental health (as measured by the MCS score) was only correlated to postoperative functional outcome (as measured by the postoperative AOFAS and PCS score), but not other postoperative outcomes (VAS pain score, radiologic parameters). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level III, comparative study.

Patient-Reported Outcome Following Ulnotriquetral Ligament Split Tear Repair.

BACKGROUND: While the clinical presentation and mechanism of injury of ulnotriquetral (UT) ligament split tear had been well described, there has been no other studies that has reported on the outcome of a UT ligament repair. This study aims to look at the patient-reported outcomes following UT ligament split tear repair. METHODS: 18 wrists (13 right and 5 left) in 17 patients (12 males and 5 females, mean age 25.0 ± 8.4 years, range 16-50 years) who had UT ligament split tear and undergone surgical repair between November 2007 and December 2013 were retrospectively analysed. Patient-reported outcome of resolution of pain, and objective measurements such as improvement in grip strength and range of movement of the wrist were recorded. Patients were followed up until the pain was completely resolved or the last documented consultation. The mean follow-up duration was 16.2 months. RESULTS: 94% reported improvements post-surgery, of which 63% reported complete resolution of pain. 6% reported no improvement in pain post-operatively. No patient reported worsening of pain after the surgery. There was significant improvement in grip strength from a mean of 23.5 kg to 27.1 kg. There was no significant change in range of motion of the wrist. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients reported resolution or improvement of pain after surgical repair. In addition, there was statistically significant improvement in grip strength recorded.