Ultrasonography and clinical outcome comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and corticosteroid injections for chronic plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and corticosteroid injection (CSI) are treatment options for plantar fasciitis. Their clinical outcome comparison remains a debate. Also, the thickness changes of the plantar fascia on objective evaluation under the medium energy ESWT and CSI therapy are elusive. METHODS: A total of 97 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis were enrolled in the randomized prospective trial. Forty-seven patients received extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and fifty patients received corticosteroid injection (CSI). The thickness of the plantar fascia was evaluated respectively before ESWT and CSI, and at the 4th and 12th week after ESWT and CSI by ultrasonography. Pain level and clinical outcomes were recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS) and 100-points scoring systems. Correlation analysis was performed between the thickness change and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Under ultrasonography, we observed more increase of plantar fascia thickness of ESWT group than CSI group at 4th week (p=0.048). VAS of plantar fasciitis patients receiving ESWT was lower than those who received corticosteroid injection (0.001 and p⟨0.001, at 4th and 12th week). On the assessment of 100-points scoring systems, the pain level of patients with ESWT was lower than those with CSI at the 12th week (p⟨0.001). On the other hand, the increase of plantar fascia thickness at 4th week was positively correlated with the decrease of VAS score at 12th week follow-up (R=0.302, P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: At 4th week after treatment, the thickness of plantar fascia increased. Then it decreased gradually, but not to the baseline at 12th week. On the pain level outcome at 12th week, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was more efficient than corticosteroid injection (CSI) on chronic plantar fasciitis. The more change of plantar fascia after ESWT, the more efficient on clinical outcome.

Physicians' perspectives of adopting computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Using Computer-assisted orthopedic navigation surgery system (CAOS) has many advantages but is not mandatory to use during an orthopedic surgery. Therefore, opinions obtained from clinical orthopedists with this system are valuable. This paper integrates technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior to examine the determinants of continued CAOS use to facilitate user management. METHODS: Opinions from orthopedists who had used a CAOS for at least two years were collected through a cross-sectional survey to verify the research framework. Follow-up interviews with an expert panel based on their experiences of CAOS were conducted to reason the impacts of factors of the research framework. RESULTS: The results show that factors of "perceived usefulness" and "facilitating condition" determine the intention to continue using CAOS, and "perceived usefulness" was driving by "complexity of task" and "social influence". Additionally, support in practice from high-level managers had an influence on orthopedists' satisfaction after using a CAOS. CONCLUSIONS: The aging population is accompanied by the increasing requirements for medical care and medical care attendant expenses, especially in total knee replacement. More precision and improvements on survivorship of patients' artificial joints are needed. This study facilitates suggestions in user management when encountering an obstacle in implementing a CAOS. Based on these findings, scientific and practical implications are then discussed.

A modified lightwand-guided nasotracheal intubation technique for oromaxillofacial surgical patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of a double curve nasotracheal tube on lightwand-guided nasotracheal intubation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University medical center hospital. PATIENTS: 60 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing oromaxillofacial surgery. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Patients undergoing surgery with nasotracheal intubation and general anesthesia were randomly enrolled in the laryngoscopy group or the lightwand group. The same type of double curve nasotracheal tube was used in both groups. In the laryngoscopy group, intubation was assisted with a Macintosh No. 3 standard curved blade and Magill forceps. In the lightwand group, intubation was aided with a flexible lightwand device (without the inner stiff stylet). Intubation time was divided into two parts: Part one, from selected naris to oropharynx; Part two, from oropharynx into trachea. Part one, Part two, and total intubation time, hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubation, and adverse events or complications were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Total intubation times in the lightwand group and the laryngoscopy group were 22.8 +/- 8.0 sec vs 30.3 +/- 8.2 sec (P < 0.001), respectively. The lightwand group had comparable hemodynamic responses to those of the laryngoscopy group. Adverse events and complications were all self-limited, with similar occurrence in both groups. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing oromaxillofacial surgery, modified lightwand-guided nasotracheal intubation is feasible with a double curve nasotracheal tube and is an efficient alternative technique.