Efficacy of Blue LED Phototherapy on Sleep Quality and Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: People with dementia often experience behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which are a major cause of caregiver burden and institutionalization. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of blue-enriched light therapy for BPSD in institutionalized older adults with dementia. METHODS: Participants were enrolled and randomly allocated into blue-enriched light therapy (N = 30) or the conventional light group (N = 30) for 60 min in 10 weeks with five sessions per week. The primary outcome was sleep quality measured by actigraphy and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The secondary outcome was overall BPSD severity (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory [CMAI] and Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI-NH]). The outcome indicators were assessed at baseline, mid-test, immediate posttest, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up. The effects of the blue-enriched light therapy were examined by the generalized estimating equation model. RESULTS: Blue-enriched light therapy revealed significant differences in the objective sleep parameters (sleep efficiency: ß = 5.81, Waldχ2 = 32.60, CI: 3.82; 7.80; sleep latency: ß = -19.82, Waldχ2 = 38.38, CI:-26.09; -13.55), subjective sleep quality (PSQI: ß = -2.07, Waldχ2 = 45.94, CI: -2.66; -1.47), and overall BPSD severity (CMAI: ß = -0.90, Waldχ2 = 14.38, CI: -1.37; -0.44) (NPI-NH: ß = -1.67, Waldχ2 = 30.61, CI: -2.26; -1.08) compared to conventional phototherapy immediate posttest, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up. Furthermore, the effects for sleep efficiency and sleep latency lasted for up to 6 months. In the subscale analysis, the differences of the behavioral symptoms changed significantly between the groups in physical/nonaggressive (CI: -1.01; -0.26) and verbal/nonaggressive (CI: -0.97; -0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Blue-enriched light therapy is a feasible low-cost intervention that could be integrated as a comprehensive therapy program for BPSD among older adults with dementia.

Efficacy of multi-domain cognitive function training on cognitive function, working memory, attention, and coordination in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: A one-year prospective randomised controlled trial.

Background: Cognitive function, working memory, attention, and coordination are higher-level functions sharing a complex relationship. Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of multi-domain cognitive function interventions to improve cognitive outcomes. We evaluated the effectiveness of such interventions on cognitive function, working memory, attention, and coordination in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial in community care centres of Northern Taiwan. We recruited 72 participants aged≥65 years and randomly allocated them using 1:1 block randomization (block size = 4) into experimental (multi-domain cognitive function training) (MCFT) and control groups (passive information activities) (PIA) (n = 36/group). We administered the interventions in both groups for 30 minutes per session, three sessions per week for eight weeks, for a total of 24 sessions. The outcome indicators were cognitive function assessed (mini-mental status examination), working memory (digit span), selective attention (Stroop test), visual-spatial attention (trail making test-A (TMT-A)), divided attention (trail making test-B (TMT-B)), and coordination (Berry visual-motor integration (Berry-VMI)). We evaluated the study outcomes at baseline, immediate post-test, one-month follow-up, and one-year follow-up. Results: We found no significant differences between the groups at baseline except for education. The average age of participants was 82.3 years, and most (76.4%) were female. We analysed the results by generalised estimating equations (GEE) based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The multi-domain cognitive function training was effective in improving cognitive function (ß = 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.63-2.31; P = 0.001), working memory (ß = -1.45; 95% CI = -2.62, -0.27; P = 0.016), and selective attention (ß = -23.3; 95% = CI -43.9, -2.76; P = 0.026) compared to passive information activities at 1-month follow-up. The effects of multi-domain cognitive function training on cognitive function (ß = 1.51; 95% CI = 0.40-2.63; P = 0.008), working memory (ß = -1.93; 95% CI -3.33, -0.54; P = 0.007), selective attention (ß = -27.8; 95% CI = -47.1, -8.48; P = 0.005), and coordination (ß = 1.61; 95% CI = 0.25, 2.96; P = 0.020) were maintained for one year. There were no significant improvements in attention outcomes (visual-spatial and divided attention) after training. Conclusions: MCFT intervention demonstrated favourable effects in improving global cognitive function, working memory, selective attention, and coordination among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. Thus, applying multi-domain cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia could help to delay the cognitive decline. Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000039306).

Global prevalence of low resilience among the general population and health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the global prevalence of low resilience among the general population and health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, WHO COVID-19 databases, and grey literature were searched for studies from January 1, 2020, to August 22, 2022. Hoy's assessment tool was used to assess for risk of bias. Meta-analysis and moderator analysis was performed using the Generalized Linear Mixed Model with a corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) adopting the random-effect model in R software. Between-study heterogeneity was measured using I2 and τ2 statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 44 studies involving 51,119 participants were identified. The pooled prevalence of low resilience was 27.0 % (95 % CI: 21.0 %-33.0 %) with prevalence among the general population being 35.0 % (95 % CI: 28.0 %-42.0 %) followed by 23.0 % (95 % CI: 16.0 %-30.9 %) for health professionals. The 3-month trend analysis of the prevalence of low resilience beginning January 2020 to June 2021 revealed upward then downward patterns among overall populations. The prevalence of low resilience was higher in females, studied during the delta variant dominant period, frontline health professionals, and undergraduate degree education. LIMITATIONS: Study outcomes showed high heterogeneity; however, sub-group and meta-regression analyses were conducted to identify potential moderating factors. CONCLUSIONS: Globally, 1 out of 4 people among the general population and health professionals experienced low resilience due to COVID-19 adversity. The prevalence of low resilience was twice as much among the general population compared to health professionals. These findings provide information for policymakers and clinicians in the development and implementation of resilience-enhancing programs.

Prevalence of sleep-related breathing disorders and associated risk factors among people with dementia: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD) have shown to cause worsened cognitive impairment among people with dementia. Therefore, we conducted the first meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of SRBD among people with dementia. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted in Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used for the pooled prevalence analysis and heterogeneity using I2 test and Cochran's Q-statistic in R-software. Study quality was assessed by Hoy's risk of bias assessment tool. Overall, 20 studies from 1282 studies were included with 1461 participants. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of SRBD among dementia was 59% (95%CI: 44%-73%) with 55% (95%CI: 34%-74%) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), 49% (95%CI: 25%-73%) for unspecified SRBD, and 11% (95%CI: 5%-21%) for central sleep apnea (CSA). Regarding dementia subtypes, the prevalence of SRBD was 89% (95%CI: 61%-97%) for Alzheimer's dementia, 56% (95%CI: 48%-63%) for Parkinson's and Idiopathic Parkinson's dementia, and 16% (95%CI: 8%-30%) for Huntington's dementia. Significant moderator variables were male, body mass index, larger waist and hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and comorbidities including hypertension, dyslipidemia, renal disease, diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable high prevalence of SRBD among dementia people, with OSA and unspecified SRBD being fivefold higher than CSA. Regarding dementia subtypes, Parkinson's and Idiopathic Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's dementia had four to sixfold increased risk of presenting with SRBD than Huntington's dementia. Therefore, assessment and management of SRBD in Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's and Idiopathic Parkinson's dementia deserves more attention in future research.