Ropinirole eye drops induce vomiting effectively in dogs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.

There is a need for an effective and safe emetic agent that dog owners could easily administer to their dogs following veterinary advice in cases of potential poisoning. As a response to this need, a randomised, double-blind, multi-site, clinical field study was performed to assess the efficacy, safety and usability of ropinirole eye drops to induce vomiting in dogs. Ropinirole (target dose 3.75 mg/m2) was applied to eyes of 100 dogs, and 32 dogs received placebo. The drug was administered by the dog owner at a veterinary clinic under the supervision of a veterinarian and led to vomition in 95% of the ropinirole-treated dogs within 30 min. The median time to first vomit was 10 min (range: 3-37 min). None of the dogs receiving placebo vomited in this time period. All owners were able to administer the product and 96% of them assessed the administration to be very easy or easy, which was confirmed by the observing veterinarian. Some ocular signs were seen both with ropinirole and placebo, hyperaemia being the most common. All observed signs were transient and in most cases mild. Ropinirole eye drops provided an effective, safe and reliable means to induce emesis in dogs.

Comparison of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in the treatment of constipation in elderly institutionalized patients: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a commonly used osmotic laxative. PEG with electrolytes is mixed with water, but PEG without electrolytes can also be mixed with, for example, juice, coffee or tea, making it more palatable. Laxatives, including PEG, are commonly used by the elderly, particularly those living in institutions. Few clinical studies, however, have investigated the use of PEG in this population. OBJECTIVE: To test whether PEG 4000 without electrolytes (hypotonic PEG) is at least as effective and safe as PEG 4000 with electrolytes (isotonic PEG) in elderly institutionalized constipated patients. The acceptability of the treatments was also compared. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at ten private assisted-living facilities or communal nursing homes in Finland. Eligible patients were required to have used isotonic PEG at a stable dose without any other treatment for constipation (except for Plantago ovata seeds) for at least 2 weeks prior to a run-in period. After the 1-week run-in, 62 patients (mean age 86 years; range 66-99 years) were randomly either switched to receive hypotonic PEG or continued to receive isotonic PEG, both dissolved in water, 12 g once or twice daily or once every other day, for 4 weeks. Stool frequency, stool consistency, stool straining and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded. Safety laboratory tests were conducted before and after the treatment period. Acceptability was assessed at the end of the study. RESULTS: At week 4, mean (SD) weekly stool frequencies in the hypotonic and isotonic PEG groups were 8.5 (4.5) and 8.4 (3.6), respectively. The mean stool frequency ratio (95% CI) was 0.90 (0.74, 1.10); thus, the PEG products were considered equally effective. At week 4, the proportion of patients with soft or normal stool consistency was higher in the hypotonic PEG group than in the isotonic PEG group (70% vs 52%), but this difference was not statistically significant. There were no differences between the groups in stool straining or gastrointestinal symptoms. In the safety laboratory tests, no clinically significant differences between the groups were detected, although plasma sodium level was statistically significantly lower in the hypotonic PEG group at the end of the study (137.7 vs 138.9 mmol/L, respectively; p = 0.012). Most patients were willing to continue their study treatment (85% in the hypotonic PEG and 63% in the isotonic PEG group; p = 0.070). Compared with only 12% of the patients receiving hypotonic PEG, however, 31% of the patients in the isotonic PEG group rated the taste of the study treatment as bad or very bad (p = 0.101). CONCLUSION: Hypotonic PEG solution is as effective as isotonic PEG in the treatment of constipation in elderly institutionalized patients. Both treatments appear safe, well tolerated and, when dissolved in water, well accepted by the majority of the patients. When desired, switching from isotonic to hypotonic PEG can safely take place in elderly individuals without compromising efficacy.

Pharmacokinetics and excretion balance of OR-1896, a pharmacologically active metabolite of levosimendan, in healthy men.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and excretion balance of [(14)C]-OR-1896, a pharmacologically active metabolite of levosimendan, in six healthy male subjects. In addition, pharmacokinetic parameters of total radiocarbon and the deacetylated congener, OR-1855, were determined. METHODS: OR-1896 was administered as a single intravenous infusion of 200 microg of [(14)C]-OR-1896 (specific activity 8.6 MBq/mg) over 10 min. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by three-compartmental methods. RESULTS: During the 14-day collection of urine and faeces, excretion (+/-S.D.) averaged 94.2+/-1.4% of the [(14)C]-OR-1896 dose. Mean recovery of radiocarbon in urine was 86.8+/-1.9% and in faeces 7.4+/-1.5%. Mean terminal elimination half-life of OR-1896 (t(1/2)) was 70.0+/-44.9 h. Maximum concentrations of OR-1855 were approximately 30% to that of OR-1896. Total clearance and the volume of distribution of OR-1896 were 2.0+/-0.4 l/h and 175.6+/-74.5l, respectively. Renal clearances of OR-1896 and OR-1855 were 0.9+/-0.4 l/h and (5.4+/-2.3)x10(-4) l/h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data to demonstrate that nearly one half of OR-1896 is eliminated unchanged into urine and that the active metabolites metabolite of levosimendan remain in the body longer than levosimendan. The remaining half of OR-1896 dose is eliminated through other metabolic routes, partially through interconversion back to OR-1855 with further metabolism of OR-1855. Given the fact that the pharmacological activity and potency of OR-1896 is similar to levosimendan, these results emphasize the clinical significance of OR-1896 and its contribution to the long-lasting effects of levosimendan.

Entacapone improves the availability of L-dopa in plasma by decreasing its peripheral metabolism independent of L-dopa/carbidopa dose.

AIMS: Entacapone is a peripherally acting catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor. To improve the benefits of oral L-dopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), entacapone is administered as a 200 mg dose with each daily dose of L-dopa. This study evaluated the effects of entacapone 200 mg on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of L-dopa given as standard release L-dopa/carbidopa. METHODS: Six different doses of l-dopa/carbidopa were investigated in this placebo-controlled, double-blind (regarding entacapone), randomized, single-dose study in 46 young healthy males. The subjects were divided into three groups (n = 14-16). Two different L-dopa/carbidopa doses were administered to each subject (50/12.5 mg and 150/37.5 mg, or 100/10 mg and 100/25 mg, or 200/50 mg and 250/25 mg). Each dose was given on two occasions; simultaneously with entacapone or with placebo, in random order, on two consecutive study visits, separated by a washout period of at least 3 weeks (four-way crossover design). Serial blood samples were drawn before dosing and up to 24 h after the dose and pharmacokinetic parameters of L-dopa, its metabolites, carbidopa, and entacapone were determined. RESULTS: Entacapone increased the AUC(0,12 h) of L-dopa to a similar extent at all doses of L-dopa/carbidopa, that is by about 30-40% compared with placebo (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.15, 0.40). When evaluated as the ratio of geometric means, entacapone slightly decreased the mean C(max) values for L-dopa at all L-dopa/carbidopa doses compared with placebo. When given with entacapone, higher plasma concentrations of L-dopa were maintained for a longer period at all doses of L-dopa/carbidopa. Entacapone also decreased the peripheral formation of 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) to about 55-60% of the placebo treatment level (P < 0.001, 95% CI -0.72, -0.35) and increased the mean AUC(0,12 h) of 3,4-dihydroxy-phenylacetic acid (DOPAC) 2-2.6-fold compared with placebo (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.60, 1.10). The mean AUC(0,12 h) of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid (HVA) following entacapone was approximately 65-75% of that observed with placebo (P < 0.001-0.05, 95% CI -0.76, -0.01) at each L-dopa/carbidopa dose except the 50/12.5 mg dose (P > 0.05, 95% CI -0.59, 0.05). The metabolic ratios (MR, AUC metabolite/AUC L-dopa) also confirmed that entacapone significantly decreased the proportion of 3-OMD (P < 0.001, 95% CI -0.85, -0.68) and HVA (P < 0.001, 95% CI -1.01, -0.18) in plasma at each L-dopa/carbidopa dose, whereas the AUC DOPAC/AUC L-dopa ratio was increased again at all doses (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.26, 0.90). Entacapone did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of carbidopa at any of the doses, nor did L-dopa/carbidopa affect the pharmacokinetics of entacapone. CONCLUSIONS: The 200 mg dose of entacapone similarly and significantly increases the AUC of L-dopa by changing the metabolic balance of L-dopa independent of the L-dopa/carbidopa dose and therefore entacapone is likely to have a similar L-dopa potentiating effect independent of L-dopa dose.