Acute stress differentially alters reward-related decision making and inhibitory control under threat of punishment.

Acute stress has various effects on cognition, executive function and certain forms of cost/benefit decision making. Recent studies in rodents indicate that acute stress differentially alters reward-related decisions involving particular types of costs and slows choice latencies. Yet, how stress alters decisions where rewards are linked to punishment is less clear. We examined how 1 h restraint stress, followed by behavioral testing 10 min later altered action-selection on two tasks involving reward-seeking under threat of punishment in well-trained male and female rats. One study used a risky decision-making task involving choice between a small/safe reward and a large/risky one that could coincide with shock, delivered with a probability that increased over blocks of trials. Stress increased risk aversion and punishment sensitivity, reducing preference for the larger/risky reward, while increasing decision latencies and trial omissions in both sexes, when rats were teste. A second study used a "behavioral control" task, requiring inhibition of approach towards a readily available reward associated with punishment. Here, food pellets were delivered over discrete trials, half of which coincided with a 12 s audiovisual cue, signalling that reward retrieval prior to cue termination would deliver shock. Stress exerted sex- and timing-dependent effects on inhibitory control. Males became more impulsive and received more shocks on the stress test, whereas females were unaffected on the stress test, and were actually less impulsive when tested 24 h later. None of the effects of restraint stress were recapitulated by systemic treatment with physiological doses of corticosterone. These findings suggest acute stress induces qualitatively distinct and sometimes sex-dependent effects on punished reward-seeking that are critically dependent on whether animals must either choose between different actions or withhold them to obtain rewards and avoid punishment.

Epidemiology of Burkholderia Infections in People with Cystic Fibrosis in Canada between 2000 and 2017.

Rationale: Infections by Burkholderia species bacteria in cystic fibrosis (CF) may be transmissible, necessitating infection control measures, and remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. The last major study of Burkholderia epidemiology in Canada included cases up until July 2000 and was marked by the dominance of a limited number of epidemic clones of Burkholderia cenocepacia.Objectives: Describe the nationwide epidemiology of Burkholderia species infections in people with cystic fibrosis in Canada over the 17-year period since 2000.Methods: Isolates were collected from across Canada between August 2000 and July 2017 and identified to the species and, for isolates between 2015 and 2017, strain level.Results: We analyzed 1,362 Burkholderia isolates from at least 396 people with CF. Forty-nine percent (n = 666) of all isolates and 47% (n = 179) of new incident infections were identified as B. multivorans. The incidence of Burkholderia infection in the Canadian CF population did not change between 2000 and 2017 at 6 cases per 1,000 annually. Multilocus sequence typing analysis suggested minimal sharing of clones in Canada.Conclusions: The epidemiology of Burkholderia in CF in Canada has shifted from limited numbers of epidemic strains of B. cenocepacia to largely nonclonal isolates of B. multivorans, B. cenocepacia, and other species. Despite widespread infection control, however, Burkholderia species bacteria continue to be acquired by people with CF at an unchanged rate, posing a continued hazard.