Oral dosage form administration practice in children under 6 years of age: A survey study of paediatric nurses.

The purpose of this study was to interview paediatric nurses on administration issues using extemporaneous capsules and marketed capsules and tablets in children younger than 6 years old, based on most frequently administered drugs in six participating wards. The 59 responding nurses estimated respectively at 7.7±1.7 and 7.3±1.8years the age from which children would properly swallow extemporaneous capsules and marketed solids, with 33% and 37% of nurses considering that children under 6 would not get their prescribed treatment using these dosage forms. Refusal of the child to take the solid was the first reason to explain administration failure (85% of nurses for extemporaneous capsules, 89% for marketed solids). Although type of formulation and requirement of chewing were factors influencing the age at which children would take solid from nurses' experience, size of conventional tablets was not among these factors. All respondents use to crush tablets in children unable to swallow whole solids; 37% of nurses systematically split the tablets to ease the swallowing in children able to swallow. Only 11 nurses had an information tool at their disposal to guide manipulation of solids, with 7 of them using it in their daily practice. Providing specific-ward questionnaires, this study gives factual information on administration practices, perceptions and issues faced by paediatric nurses.

Oral drug dosage forms administered to hospitalized children: Analysis of 117,665 oral administrations in a French paediatric hospital over a 1-year period.

Selecting the most appropriate dosage form, that ensures safe administration and adherence of medications, is a major issue for children. Marketed drugs, however, have rarely been tested for their use in children. There is a need for more data on drug formulations administered to children to identify unmet needs, and drive future paediatric research. We observed, over a 12-month follow-up, 117,665 oral drug administrations to 1998 hospitalized children. Nine-tenths belonged to five Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classes: Alimentary tract & metabolism, Nervous system, Cardiovascular system, Anti-infectives for systemic use and Blood & blood forming organs, one third of drug doses administered to school-age children and adolescents were liquids, and extemporaneous capsules were commonly used in younger children. Our study shows that despite the advantages of solid dosage forms and recent evidence from randomized controlled trials showing their acceptability in infants, they are seldom used in paediatric practice.

[Oral formulation of choice for children]. / Choisir la forme pharmaceutique orale la plus adaptée à l'enfant.

Selecting the most appropriate oral formulation is very challenging when developing medicines for children and in routine practice. Research in pediatric pharmacology has focused on oral drug formulation, determining whether the active pharmaceutical ingredient can be successfully delivered to children. Pediatric expert committees (EMA, EuFPI) recommend that children's medicines be safe, well tolerated, easy to use (palatable and requiring minimal handling), transportable, easily produced, cost effective, commercially viable, with a minimal impact on children's life-style. Oral liquid drug formulations (OLFs: solutions, syrups, suspensions) are historically considered as the most appropriate oral formulation for children, since they are easy to swallow for younger infants and palatable for children. However, OLFs present numerous disadvantages, such as low stability, potentially toxic excipients for children, and low transportability. In the long-term, dose volume and frequency of administration might lead to non-compliance. Multiple preparation steps and volume calculations are also among risk factors for medicine errors in children. An alternative to OLFs is the conventional solid oral dosage form (OSF), such as tablets and capsules. These offer the advantages of greater stability, easy dose selection, improved transportability, and ease of storage. They also allow the modification of drug pharmacokinetic parameters, minimizing administration frequency. Finally, OSFs are less costly than OLFs, since they are easier to develop, manufacture, transport, store, and deliver. Controlled study results suggest that the use of OSFs in children would be associated with greater acceptability by children, greater preference on the part of caregivers, and higher drug compliance than OLFs. Recent controlled studies, confirming that OSFs with an acceptable size for children (mini-tablets), should shift the current paradigm of OLFs as the reference for children's oral medicine. We lack evidence on OSF acceptability in children and its influence on drug compliance, particularly with appropriate-size OSFs for children. Further investigation on oral formulation should investigate the utilisation of OSFs in young children. Few OSFs are licensed for children under 6 years of age.

Impact of intravenous lipid emulsion infusion on the stratum corneum barrier function in patients receiving parenteral nutrition.

The importance of the lipid matrix of stratum corneum (SC) in epidermal barrier function is well documented. Intravenous lipid emulsions (ILE) provide essential fatty acids (EFAs), main components of the SC lipid matrix. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of ILE upon SC barrier function. The skin barrier was assessed by measuring transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Patients receiving lipid-containing parenteral nutrition (LCPN) were compared to patients receiving lipid-free PN (LFPN). In addition, a before/after LCPN introduction study was set up to limit the influence of inter-individual variability. Twenty-six patients receiving LCPN and seven patients receiving LFPN were included. Median age was not significantly different between the two groups. The TEWL of the LCPN group (9.05 g/m2/h) was significantly lower than the TEWL of the LFPN group (12.1 g/m2/h; Wilcoxon test: p = 0.016). The relative variation of TEWL before and after ILE treatment of 5 studied patients was 21.29 ± 10.28 %. ILE improve epidermal barrier function when compared to lipid-free parenteral treatments. Results of the before/after study confirm this conclusion and the usefulness of ILE intake for preventing excessive TEWL. SC barrier function improvement could be a choice criterion between the different ILE generations, in particular in burn patients and premature neonates.

[Practical application of the charter of pharmaceutical sales visit]. / Application pratique de la charte de la visite médicale.

BACKGROUND: Visits from pharmaceutical representatives are controlled in France by regulations, but also by a Charter of good practice. The goal of this study was to measure compliance to the conditions of this charter by participating pharmaceutical companies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An assessment grid was drafted to determine compliance to interdictions and obligations concerning the information provided during visits from pharmaceutical representatives. RESULTS: We studied 20 visits from pharmaceutical representatives. All of the documents and obligatory information were only provided in 5% of cases. During 80% of these meetings, the pharmaceutical representatives made a comparison with competitor's drugs, which was associated with negative remarks in 44% of cases. The pharmaceutical representatives promoted cases of use outside those, which had received marketing approval in 35%. Gifts or samples were offered at the end of these meetings in 20% of cases. Prohibited practices were observed in a total of 85% of cases. DISCUSSION: This study shows that meetings are respected by pharmaceutical representatives in terms of regulations related to donations. In opposite, there is a very low compliance concerning the proper use of the drug, whether to provide official documentation, to give information respectful of other pharmaceutical companies or to promote the proper use. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that, at present hospital visits by pharmaceutical representatives do not respect the commitments made by the pharmaceutical industry, and do not make it possible to ensure that honest information is provided to favor the proper use of drugs.

[Depyrogenation test regarding inox and glass containers in the preparation of parenteral nutrition mixtures]. / Test de dépyrogénation des conteneurs en inox et en verre pour la préparation des mélanges pour nutrition parentérale.

INTRODUCTION: The preparation of parenteral nutrition mixture (PNM) in an open chamber requires the use of intermediate containers sterile and non-pyrogenic. A sterilization of containers by moist heat in large autoclaves is the suitable method. However, sterilization by moist heat is not a depyrogenation method. In our study, we report the validation of a sterilization and depyrogenation method for containers by dry heat using a convection oven. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sterilization and depyrogenation of material by dry heat have been audited by the reduction of at least three logarithms of original endotoxin rate. The containers were initially artificially contaminated with a suspension of endotoxin for 16 hours. Contaminated containers were placed in an oven with revolving heat at 250 °C for 1 hour. After treatment with dry heat, the residual endotoxin levels in the containers were determined by a kinetic chromogenic method. RESULTS: After treatment with dry heat, the average log reductions of endotoxin levels were respectively, for glass and steel containers, 4.78 ± 0.07 and 4.87 ± 0.03. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The present validation study confirms the effectiveness of treatment with dry heat for sterilization and depyrogenation of glass and steel containers. This method of sterilization and depyrogenation meets the microbiological quality requirements for the preparation of MNP.