Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 370: 191-196, 2023 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36356696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For years, physical activity (PA) has been considered a mixed blessing in terms of the risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF). Previous analyses have had equivocal results regarding the cut-off of PA level beyond which AF risk increases, if such a limit really does exist. Data regarding females in particular have been scarce. METHODS: We performed a dose-response meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between weekly PA and the risk for AF in females. Major electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the association between leisure time PA and the risk for incident AF in females from the general population. The linearity of the dose-response curve was assessed using the restricted cubic spline model. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies, which involved 1,821,422 females, were included in the final analysis. AF incidence was 3.7%. Dose-response analysis revealed an inverse nonlinear relationship between weekly PA and the risk for incident AF (p for linearity <0.0001). No significant heterogeneity was documented (I2 = 37%). Cautious interpretation is needed for PA exceeding 50 metabolic equivalents of task- hours per week (METs- h/w), due to limited available data for these high levels of PA. CONCLUSION: According to this analysis, physicians can safely advise females to perform up to 50METs- h/w of moderate or vigorous PA, to reduce the risk for future AF. Interestingly, significant benefit can be attained even at low levels of regular weekly PA.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Humanos , Feminino , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Atividade Motora , Incidência , Fatores de Risco
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 45(6): 717-725, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35554947

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Many of the complications arising from cardiac device implantation are associated to the venous access used for lead placement. Previous analyses reported that cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) is safer but less effective than subclavian vein puncture (SVP). However, comparisons between these techniques and axillary vein puncture (AVP) - guided either by ultrasound or fluoroscopy - are lacking. Thus, we aimed to compare safety and efficacy of these approaches. METHODS: We searched for articles assessing at least two different approaches regarding the incidence of pneumothorax and/or lead failure (LF). When available, bleeding and infectious complications as well as procedural success were analyzed. A frequentist random effects network meta-analysis model was adopted. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were analyzed. Most articles assessed SVP versus CVC. Compared to SVP, both CVC and AVP were associated with reduced odds of pneumothorax (OR: 0.193, 95%CI: 0.136-0.275 and OR: 0.128, 95%CI: 0.050-0.329; respectively) and LF (OR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.406-0.976 and OR: 0.425, 95%CI: 0.286-0.632; respectively). No significant differences between AVP and CVC were demonstrated. Limited data suggests no major impact of different approaches on infectious and bleeding complications. Initial CVC approach required significantly more often an alternate/additional venous access for lead placement, compared to both AVP and SVP. No differences between these two were identified. CONCLUSION: Both AVP and CVC seem to decrease incident pneumothorax and LF, compared to SVP. Initial AVP approach seems to decrease the need of alternate venous access, compared to CVC. These results suggest that AVP should be further clinically tested.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Pneumotórax , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Eletrônica , Humanos , Metanálise em Rede , Veia Subclávia , Venostomia/métodos
3.
Acta Cardiol ; 77(6): 536-544, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the prognostic role of left atrial peak systolic longitudinal strain (LA-PLSsys) as a predictor of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation. METHODS: We systematically searched major electronic databases and grey literature for studies assessing the role of pre-ablation LA-PLSsys, measured in at least two segments, in post-ablation AF recurrence, after a follow-up period of at least 6 months. RESULTS: Seventeen eligible studies were included, resulting in 1704 patients (68.6% men) with a pooled mean age of 59.9 ± 10.6 years, 65.9% with paroxysmal AF. Recurrence occurred in 32.7% of patients. Those without recurrence had significantly higher LA-PLSsys (pooled mean ± SD: 22.22 ± 10.64%, weighted mean difference: 5.43%, 95%CI: 4.03-6.84%, I2: 82.7%). Subgroup analysis revealed that the methodology used (echocardiographic view and segments assessed), was a significant source of heterogeneity (p = 0.02). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that the effect size was inversely related to the baseline LA volume index (p = 0.004), while concerns are also raised about patients with extremely high/low pre-ablation LA strain. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-ablation LA-PLSsys seems to be a useful predictor of post-ablation AF recurrence, that could optimise patients selection. Nevertheless, the substantial heterogeneity that was noted may limit its clinical use. Further investigation using a uniform methodological assessment technique is required to derive a reference range, with adequate positive and negative predictive value for recurrence.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Átrios do Coração
4.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 63(3): 523-530, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34218421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is associated with arrhythmic events in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), while others have questioned the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a sole predictor of future events. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of LGE on CMR in identifying patients with NICM and reduced LVEF for whom a benefit from defibrillator implantation for primary prevention is not anticipated, thus they are mainly exposed to potential risks. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched for studies reporting the incidence of appropriate device therapy (ADT), sudden cardiac death (SCD), and cardiac death based on the presence of LGE on CMR, among patients with NICM and reduced LVEF, implanted with a cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention. RESULTS: Eleven studies (1652 patients, 947 with LGE) were included in the final analysis. LGE presence was strongly associated with ADT (logOR: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.21-2.69) and cardiac death (logOR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.14-1.68), but not with SCD (logOR: 0.26, 95%CI: -1.09-1.6). Diagnostic accuracy analysis demonstrated that contrast enhancement is a sensitive marker of future ADT and cardiac death (93%, 95%CI: 85.8-96.7%; 82.9%, 95%CI: 70.6-90.7%; respectively), with moderate specificity ( 44%, 95%CI: 27.2-62.6%; 37.7%, 95%CI: 23.4-54.6%; respectively). CONCLUSION: LGE is a highly sensitive predictor of ADT and cardiac death in NICM patients implanted with a defibrillator for primary prevention. However, due to moderate specificity, derivation of a cutoff with adequate predictive values and probably a multifactorial approach are needed to improve discrimination of patients who will not benefit from ICDs.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Cardiomiopatias/complicações , Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiomiopatias/terapia , Meios de Contraste , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Gadolínio , Humanos , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevenção Primária , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Volume Sistólico , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/complicações , Função Ventricular Esquerda
5.
Heart ; 107(13): 1047-1053, 2021 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a major clinical manifestation of coronary artery disease. Post-MI morbidity and mortality can be reduced by lifestyle changes and aggressive risk factor modification. These changes can be applied more effectively if the patient is actively involved in the process. The hypothesis of this study was that an educational programme in post-MI patients could lead to reduced incidence of cardiovascular events. METHODS: Post-MI patients were prospectively randomised into two groups. Patients in the intervention arm were scheduled to attend an 8-week-long educational programme on top of usual treatment, while controls received optimal treatment. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, cerebrovascular event and unscheduled hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes. Endpoint adjudication was blinded. RESULTS: 329 patients (238 men) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 17±4 months. In the primary analysis, mean primary end point-free survival time was 597 days (95% CI 571 to 624) in controls, compared with 663 days (95% CI 638 to 687) in the intervention group (p<0.001). The HR in the univariate Cox regression analysis was 0.48 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.73; p=0.001). The raw rates of the primary endpoint were 20.8% (6 deaths, 13 MIs, 2 strokes and 14 hospitalisations) vs 36.6% (8 deaths, 22 MIs, 7 strokes and 22 hospitalisations), respectively (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.74; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a relatively short adult education programme offered to post-MI patients has beneficial effects, resulting in reduced risk of cardiovascular events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04007887.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...