Application of accurate mass measurement to urine drug screening.

Poor availability of reference standards for designer drugs, metabolites, and new substances prevents toxicology laboratories from rapidly responding to the changing analytical challenges of drug abuse. A novel screening approach comprising determination of accurate masses of sample components and comparison of these with databases of theoretical monoisotopic masses is described. Using liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOFMS), a routine mass search window of 20-30 ppm was applied to urine samples. The ultimate reference technique, liquid chromatography-Fourier transform mass spectrometry (LC-FTMS), was capable of confirming the findings within a 3 ppm mass accuracy. Using a target database of 7640 compounds, the number of potential elemental formulas ranged from one to three with LC-TOFMS, and it was always one with LC-FTMS. In contrast to ordinary techniques requiring primary reference standards, the formula-based databases can be updated instantly with fresh numeric data from scientific literature and authority sources.

Analysis of street drugs in seized material without primary reference standards.

A novel approach was used to analyze street drugs in seized material without primary reference standards. Identification was performed by liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC/TOFMS), essentially based on accurate mass determination using a target library of 735 exact monoisotopic masses. Quantification was carried out by liquid chromatography/chemiluminescence nitrogen detection (LC/CLND) with a single secondary standard (caffeine), utilizing the detector's equimolar response to nitrogen. Sample preparation comprised dilution, first with methanol and further with the LC mobile phase. Altogether 21 seized drug samples were analyzed blind by the present method, and results were compared to accredited reference methods utilizing identification by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and quantification by gas chromatography or liquid chromatography. The 31 drug findings by LC/TOFMS comprised 19 different drugs-of-abuse, byproducts, and adulterants, including amphetamine and tryptamine designer drugs, with one unresolved pair of compounds having an identical mass. By the reference methods, 27 findings could be confirmed, and among the four unconfirmed findings, only 1 apparent false positive was found. In the quantitative analysis of 11 amphetamine, heroin, and cocaine findings, mean relative difference between the results of LC/CLND and the reference methods was 11% (range 4.2-21%), without any observable bias. Mean relative standard deviation for three parallel LC/CLND results was 6%. Results suggest that the present combination of LC/TOFMS and LC/CLND offers a simple solution for the analysis of scheduled and designer drugs in seized material, independent of the availability of primary reference standards.

Toxicological screening with formula-based metabolite identification by liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

An analytical procedure was evaluated for the comprehensive toxicological screening of drugs, metabolites, and pesticides in 1-mL urine samples by TurboIon spray liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC/TOFMS) in the positive ionization mode and continuous mass measurement. The substance database consisted of exact monoisotopic masses for 637 compounds, of which an LC retention time was available for 392. A macroprogram was refined for extracting the data into a legible report, utilizing metabolic patterns and preset identification criteria. These criteria included +/-30 ppm mass tolerance, a +/-0.2-min window for absolute retention time, if available, and a minimum area count of 500. The limit of detection, determined for 90 compounds, was <0.1 mg/L for 73% of the compounds studied and >1.0 mg/L for 6% of the compounds. For method comparisons, 50 successive autopsy urine samples were analyzed by this method, and the results confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Findings for parent drugs were consistent with both methods; in addition, LC/TOFMS regularly revealed apparently correct findings for metabolites not shown by GC/MS. Mean and median mass accuracy by LC/TOFMS was 7.6 and 5.4 ppm, respectively. The procedure proved well-suited for tentative identification without reference substances. The few false positives emphasized the fact that all three parameters, exact mass, retention time, and metabolite pattern, are required for unequivocal identification.