Loss of cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ T cell responses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients with high CD4+ T cell counts and recurrent retinitis.

Clinical histories are reported for 2 patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) who experienced multiple relapses of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis, despite suppression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia and improvement in CD4+ T cell counts (to >400 cells/microL). CMV-specific CD4+ T cell immune reconstitution was measured directly, using cytokine flow cytometry, which revealed persistent deficits in CMV-specific CD4+ T cell responses in both patients. CMV-specific T cells constituted 0.14% and 0.05% of the total CD4+ T cell count in these patients, which is significantly lower than the percentages for 34 control subjects (0.6%-46%; CD4+ T cell count range, 7-1039 cells/microL; P=.019). Deficits in pathogen-specific immune responses may persist in some individuals, despite suppression of HIV-1 replication and substantial increases in circulating CD4+ T cells after HAART, and such deficits may be associated with significant morbidity from opportunistic infections.

Zanamivir for the treatment of influenza A and B infection in high-risk patients: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Influenza can cause significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients considered to be at high risk (such as the elderly and those with chronic disease) of developing influenza-related complications. Data on the efficacy of zanamivir in high-risk patients are lacking because individual studies recruited a limited number of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective pooled analysis of data from high-risk patients in studies completed before or during the 1998-1999 winter season was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of inhaled zanamivir (10 mg twice daily for 5 days) for the treatment of confirmed influenza. All studies were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled with 21- to 28-day follow-up. A total of 2751 patients was recruited. Of these, 321 (12%) were considered high risk and 154 were randomized to zanamivir. The median time to alleviation of influenza symptoms and time to return to normal activities were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Zanamivir-treated high-risk patients had a treatment benefit of 2.5 days compared with those given placebo (P = .015). Patients treated with zanamivir returned to normal activities 3.0 days earlier (P = .022) and had an 11% reduction (P = .039) in the median total symptom score over 1 to 5 days relative to those taking placebo. In addition, zanamivir reduced the incidence of complications requiring antibiotic use by 43% relative to placebo users (P = .045). Adverse events reported were of a similar nature and frequency between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis shows that zanamivir is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for influenza in patients considered at high-risk of developing influenza-related complications.

Low-dose daily subcutaneous interleukin-2 in combination with highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV+ patients: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Previous studies with intermittent interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy using intermediate and high levels of IL-2 have demonstrated significant increases in the CD4 + T cell count in HIV-infected patients. Intermittent regimens are amenable to outpatient use, but severe adverse events are frequently experienced with intermediate- and high-dose levels of IL-2. Therefore in this study, the effect of daily, subcutaneous low-dose IL-2 therapy on safety and immunological endpoints was investigated to determine whether immunological benefit could be achieved without toxicity in HIV-infected patients also receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHOD: A total of 115 patients were enrolled in the trial. Fifty-six asymptomatic HIV-infected patients who had CD4 + T cell counts less than 300 cells/microL at screening and a stable HIV viral load received low-dose IL-2 (1.2 million IU [MIU]/m 2 beginning dose) once daily in conjunction with HAART (IL-2 group). Fifty-nine patients received HAART alone (control group). RESULTS: A dramatic effect of IL-2 on the natural killer (NK) cell population was observed with mean increases of 156 cells/microL in the IL-2 group compared to 19.93 cells/microL in the control group (p <.001). Additionally, IL-2-treated patients experienced a statistically significant increase in the mean percentage of CD4 + T cells (3.52% increase) when compared to control patients (1.33% increase) (p <.001). The expanded CD4 + T cell population was primarily of the naive phenotype, with mean increases of 4.53% for the IL-2 group and 0.31% for the control group (p <.001 for between-group difference). In addition, a higher proportion of IL-2-treated patients (67%) compared to control patients (33%) achieved increases of greater than 50% in the CD4+ T cell count (p =.08). Adverse events of grade 3 or grade 4 toxicity were infrequent in the current study and were substantially lower by comparison to those in studies of intermittent dose IL-2 therapy. Also, negligible changes in the HIV viral load from baseline to final measurement were observed in both groups. A trend toward a reduced number of modifications of antiretroviral therapy was apparent in the IL-2 group when compared to control patients. CONCLUSION: Daily, low-dose subcutaneous IL-2 therapy in conjunction with HAART is safe and well tolerated and is effective in expanding lymphocyte cell types including NK cells and naive T cells in individuals who have <300 CD4+ T cells.

In vitro antiviral susceptibilities of isolates from cytomegalovirus retinitis patients receiving first- or second-line cidofovir therapy: relationship to clinical outcome.

Blood culture isolates from patients receiving first- (peripheral retinitis) or second-line (relapsing retinitis) therapy with intravenous cidofovir were obtained from three clinical trials for in vitro antiviral susceptibility analyses. Isolates from 6 patients obtained after 14.3 weeks (mean) of first-line cidofovir therapy showed complete susceptibility to cidofovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet. Isolates from 20 patients were obtained after 17.3 weeks (mean) of second-line cidofovir therapy. Ten showed complete susceptibility to all inhibitors, 3 showed low-level ganciclovir resistance (<6-fold) but were sensitive to cidofovir and foscarnet, and 7 showed moderately reduced susceptibility (<8-fold) to cidofovir and high-level resistance (8- to 23-fold) to ganciclovir in vitro. Four of these 7 isolates showed reduced susceptibility (4-fold) to foscarnet. Notably, there was no difference in time to retinitis progression in patients that were on cidofovir therapy when sensitive isolates were compared with those showing reduced susceptibility to cidofovir in vitro.

Sorivudine versus acyclovir for treatment of dermatomal herpes zoster in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Collaborative Antiviral Study Group/AIDS Clinical Trials Group, Herpes Zoster Study Group.

The present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sorivudine [1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-E-(2-bromovinyl)uracil] and acyclovir for the treatment of dermatomal herpes zoster in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive patients. A total of 170 HIV-seropositive adults presenting with herpes zoster (confirmed by direct fluorescent-antigen testing and/or viral culture) were enrolled and randomized to receive a 10-day course of orally administered sorivudine (40 mg once daily plus acyclovir placebos) or acyclovir (800 mg five times daily plus sorivudine placebo). Patients were monitored daily to document the events of cutaneous healing, pain, zoster-related complications, and drug-related adverse events. Patients were reassessed on days 21 and 28 and then once monthly for 1 year. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to the cessation of new vesicle formation. Secondary efficacy endpoints included times to other events of cutaneous healing, resolution of pain, and frequency of dissemination and zoster recurrence. In a multivariate analysis, sorivudine was superior to acyclovir for reducing the times to the cessation of new vesicle formation (relative risk [RR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 2.36; P = 0.049) and total lesion crusting (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.04; P = 0.017). In a univariate analysis, there was a trend favoring sorivudine for the cessation of new vesicle formation (median of 3 versus 4 days; P = 0.07) and a significant advantage for time to total lesion crusting (median of 7 versus 8 days; P = 0.02). The time to the resolution of zoster-associated pain, the frequency of dissemination, and the frequency of zoster recurrence were not different between the two treatment groups. Both drugs were well tolerated. Sorivudine is an effective drug for the treatment of herpes zoster in HIV-infected patients and results in accelerated cutaneous healing when compared with acyclovir therapy.

Randomized, controlled study of the safety and efficacy of intravenous cidofovir for the treatment of relapsing cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS.

To assess the effect of intravenous cidofovir on delaying progression of previously treated, relapsing cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis, we conducted a randomized, controlled comparison of two maintenance dose levels of cidofovir. One hundred and fifty patients with AIDS and CMV retinitis that had progressed or was persistently active despite treatment with ganciclovir, foscarnet, or both were randomized to receive induction cidofovir, 5 mg/kg once weekly for 2 weeks, then maintenance therapy with either 5 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg once every other week. Concomitant probenecid and intravenous hydration were administered with each cidofovir dose. Retinitis progression was assessed in the first 100 patients by bilateral, full-field retinal photographs read at a central reading center by an ophthalmologist masked to treatment assignment. Incidence of side effects, changes in visual acuity, and mortality were also assessed. Median time to retinitis progression as assessed by retinal photography was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI], 115 days-upper limit not reached) in the 5-mg/kg group, and was 49 days (95% CI, 35-52 days) in the 3-mg/kg group (p = .0006). Dose-dependent asymptomatic proteinuria (39%) and serum creatinine elevation (24%) were the most common adverse events thought to be related to cidofovir. Reversible probenecid reactions including constitutional symptoms and nausea occurred in 65 of 150 (43%) patients. Cidofovir therapy is effective in delaying progression of CMV retinitis that had previously progressed using other anti-CMV therapies.

The safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil, a novel anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) therapy, in HIV-infected adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Adefovir dipivoxil is a novel nucleotide analogue with several promising in vitro anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) characteristics. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was initiated involving 72 subjects with moderately advanced HIV disease. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive adefovir dipivoxil or placebo as a once-daily oral dose for 6 weeks, followed by 6 weeks of open-label adefovir dipivoxil. Two dose levels were studied (125 mg and 250 mg). Adefovir dipivoxil was determined to be safe and well-tolerated when administered for 12 weeks. At week 6, changes in absolute CD4 T cell levels and HIV-1 RNA levels were significantly greater with adefovir dipivoxil than with placebo. These effects were sustained through 12 weeks of treatment. As determined by standard RNA sequencing techniques, only 1 of the 24 subjects who received adefovir dipivoxil (125 mg/day) developed any genotypic change from baseline.

Quantification of cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral blood leukocytes by a branched-DNA signal amplification assay.

Quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in blood may aid in the identification of patients at highest risk for developing CMV disease, the evaluation of new therapeutics, and the prompt recognition of drug-resistant CMV strains. A branched-DNA (bDNA) assay was developed for the reliable quantification of CMV DNA in peripheral blood leukocytes. The bDNA assay allowed for the highly specific and reproducible quantification of CMV DNA in clinical specimens. Furthermore, the bDNA assay was at least as sensitive as culture techniques and displayed a nearly 3 log10 dynamic range in quantification. Changes in CMV DNA levels measured by the bDNA assay in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient undergoing therapy were consistent with CMV culture, antigen, and genotype results and correlated with disease progression and resistance markers. The bDNA assay for the quantification of CMV DNA may provide a useful tool that can be used to aid physicians in monitoring disease progression, evaluating therapeutic regimens, and recognizing viral resistance and drug failure.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cidofovir gel for the treatment of acyclovir-unresponsive mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in patients with AIDS.

The safety and efficacy of cidofovir gel for treatment of acyclovir-unresponsive herpes simplex virus infections in AIDS patients was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Cidofovir (0.3% or 1%) or placebo gel was applied once daily for 5 days. Ten of 20 cidofovir-treated and none of 10 placebo-treated patients had complete healing or >50% decreased area (P = .008); 30% of cidofovir-treated patients versus 0 placebo recipients had complete healing (P = .031). Viral shedding ceased in 13 (87%) of 15 cidofovir-treated and 0 of 9 placebo-treated patients (P = .00004). For cidofovir-treated patients, median time to complete or good response was 21 days, and median time to negative viral culture was 2 days (P = .025, P = .0001, respectively). Median lesion area decreases were 58% for cidofovir-treated versus 0 for placebo-treated patients (P = .005), and mean pain score changes were -1.84 versus -0.34 (P = .042). Application site reactions occurred in 25% of cidofovir-treated and 20% of placebo-treated patients; none was dose-limiting. Cidofovir therapy provided significant benefits in lesion healing, virologic effect, and pain reduction.

Evolution of mutations conferring multidrug resistance during prophylaxis and therapy for cytomegalovirus disease.

In a human immunodeficiency virus-infected subject, cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolated 9 months after the patient began oral ganciclovir prophylaxis was resistant to ganciclovir and cidofovir and contained mutations in both UL97 and Pol coding regions. At 1 year, retinitis developed, which progressed despite intravenous ganciclovir followed by foscarnet and then cidofovir. A subsequent buffy coat virus isolate was resistant to all three drugs and contained new mutations in UL97 and Pol. By individually transferring the observed mutations to laboratory strain AD169, it was shown that a mutation at codon 603 of UL97 conferred resistance to ganciclovir, a mutation at codon 412 of Pol conferred resistance to both ganciclovir and cidofovir, and a mutation at codon 802 of Pol conferred resistance to ganciclovir and foscarnet. This case illustrates the development of multidrug resistance during prolonged exposure to antiviral therapy for CMV and cross-resistance arising from point mutations in the CMV Pol gene.

Intravenous cidofovir for peripheral cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS. A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is the most common intraocular infection in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). If left untreated, it may lead to progressive destruction of retinal tissue and blindness. Cidofovir is a nucleotide analogue of cytosine that has potent, prolonged in vitro and in vivo activity against herpesviruses, including many CMV isolates that are resistant to ganciclovir and foscarnet. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intravenous cidofovir delays progression of previously untreated CMV retinitis. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial comparing immediate with deferred cidofovir treatment. Patients in the deferred treatment group were eligible to receive cidofovir after progression of CMV retinitis was documented by retinal photography. SETTING: Eight academic medical centers and an independent center that read retinal photographs. PATIENTS: 48 patients with AIDS and previously untreated peripheral CMV retinitis who were randomly assigned to immediate (n = 25) or deferred treatment (n = 23). INTERVENTION: Intravenous cidofovir, 5 mg/kg of body weight, once weekly for 2 weeks and then once every other week. To minimize nephrotoxicity, oral probenecid and intravenous hydration with normal saline were administered with each cidofovir infusion. MEASUREMENTS: Progression of CMV retinitis was assessed by bilateral, full-field retinal photographs that were read by an ophthalmologist who was masked to treatment assignment. Incidence of side effects, changes in visual acuity, effect on CMV shedding in urine and blood, and mortality were also assessed. RESULTS: The median time to progression of CMV retinitis was 22 days (95% CI, 10 to 27 days) in the deferred treatment group and 120 days (CI, 40 to 134 days) in the immediate treatment group (P < 0.001). Neutropenia (15%) and proteinuria (12%), both asymptomatic, were the most common serious adverse events considered to be possibly related to cidofovir. Cidofovir treatment was discontinued in 10 of 41 patients (24%) because of protocol-defined treatment-limiting nephrotoxicity. Transient reactions to probenecid, including mild to moderate constitutional symptoms or nausea, occurred in 23 of 41 patients (56%) and were dose limiting in 3 (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Cidofovir was efficacious in delaying progression of previously untreated CMV retinitis. Treatment was associated with manageable side effects; strict adherence to monitoring of renal function before cidofovir was administered and concomitant administration of probenecid and saline hydration appeared to minimize drug-related nephrotoxicity.

Cidofovir: a new therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis.

Cidofovir, (S)-1-[3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonylmethoxy)propyl]cytosine, formerly known as HPMPC, is the first antiviral nucleotide analogue available for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. Because cidofovir does not require viral activation, it has two advantages over nucleoside analogues such as ganciclovir and acyclovir. Cidofovir is active in uninfected cells and may act preemptively, and it may retain activity against ganciclovir-resistant strains. Preclinical studies showed the major toxicity of cidofovir to be dose-, schedule-, and species-dependent nephrotoxicity. These studies also showed that concomitant administration of probenecid protects animal models against cidofovir-induced nephrotoxicity. Two phase I-II studies were undertaken in HIV-positive patients with asymptomatic CMV excretion to evaluate several dose-escalation regimens. Data from both phase I-II studies showed that in patients receiving cidofovir at > or =3 mg/kg, the virologic response rate (> or =2 log reduction in CMV titer) was 93% for urine and 74% for semen. In addition, four treatment modifications were indicated to reduce the incidence of cidofovir-related nephrotoxicity: (a) dose reduction or interruption for changes in renal function; (b) concomitant administration of probenecid; (c) administration of 1 L of normal saline 1 h before infusion of cidofovir; and (d) extension of the dosing interval.

Clinical experience with cidofovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis.

Cidofovir (Vistide, HPMPC) is a nucleotide analogue with potent in vitro activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV) that was recently licensed for treatment of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and CMV retinitis. Cidofovir's prolonged intracellular half-life permits dosing once every 2 weeks for maintenance treatment. The treatment-limiting toxicity of cidofovir is dose- and schedule-dependent nephrotoxicity affecting renal proximal convoluted tubule cells. A treatment regimen that includes concomitant administration of oral probenecid, intravenous hydration, and careful preinfusion evaluation of renal function with conservative dose modification has reduced cidofovir-associated nephrotoxicity. Preliminary results of clinical studies of cidofovir in AIDS patients with newly diagnosed and relapsing CMV retinitis are described.

Drug-resistant herpes: cidofovir gel in limbo. Interview with Jay Lalezari, M.D. Interview by John S. James.

AIDS: Forvade, a cidofovir gel used topically for treatment of acyclovir-resistant herpes lesions, has recently been turned down for marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to insufficient test data. Published data of the test revealed the effectiveness of Forvade over placebo in all measurements used: lesion healing, viral cultures, and pain relief. In an interview with AIDS Treatment News, Dr. Jay Lalezari, one of the most experienced physicians in the country in treating acyclovir-resistant herpes, offers his insights on Forvade's importance as a herpes lesion treatment, why he believes the FDA made this decision to deny marketing rights, and what the fate of the drug is now likely to be. Dr. Lalezari argues that the FDA's position is weak, that the drug works, and that the needs of the patients were sacrificed in favor of speculative concerns.^ieng

Oral ganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in persons with AIDS. Roche Cooperative Oral Ganciclovir Study Group.

BACKGROUND: In the advanced stages of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, particularly vision-damaging retinitis due to CMV is common. We evaluated prophylactic treatment with orally administered ganciclovir as a way to prevent CMV disease. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of CMV infected persons with AIDS with either CD4+ lymphocyte counts of < or = 50 per cubic millimeter or counts of < or = 100 per cubic millimeter in those with a history of an AIDS defining opportunistic infection. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive either oral ganciclovir (1000 mg three times daily) or placebo. RESULTS: The study was stopped after a median 367 days of follow-up. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the twelve month cumulative rates of confirmed CMV disease were 26 percent in the placebo group (n = 239) and 14 percent in the ganciclovir group (n = 486), representing an overall reduction in risk of 49 percent in the ganciclovir group (P < 0.001). The incidence of CMV retinitis after 12 months was 24 percent in the placebo group and 12 percent in the ganciclovir group (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of CMV-positive urine cultures at base line was 42 percent; after two months it was 43 percent in the placebo group and 10 percent in the ganciclovir group (P < 0.0001). The one year mortality rate was 26 percent in the placebo group and 21 percent in the ganciclovir group (P = 0.14). Therapy with granulocyte colony stimulating factor was more frequent in the ganciclovir group (24 percent) than in the placebo group (9 percent). CONCLUSIONS: In persons with advanced AIDS, phophylactic oral ganciclovir significantly reduces the risk of CMV disease.

Antiretroviral monotherapy in early stage human immunodeficiency virus disease has no detectable effect on virus load in peripheral blood and lymph nodes.

Initiation of antiretroviral monotherapy early in the course of infection with human immunodeficiency virus may result in a temporary slowing in the rate of disease progression; however, little is known about the virologic effects of early therapy. Virus load was measured in peripheral blood and lymph nodes from 16 antiretroviral-naive patients with a mean CD4 T lymphocyte count of 659 cells/microliter at baseline and after 8 weeks of either no treatment or zidovudine therapy. CD4 T lymphocyte counts and all virologic parameters examined remained unchanged regardless of zidovudine treatment status. Histopathology and virus distribution within lymph nodes remained constant between baseline and week 8 in each patient, indicating that the virologic and histologic parameters examined in a single lymph node are representative of a systemic process. Early antiretroviral monotherapy with zidovudine had no effect on virologic parameters in this group of patients with relatively high CD4 T lymphocyte counts and low measures of virus load at baseline.