Social identification and gender-related ideology in women and men.

The nature of women's and men's gender-derived social identification was examined with a focus on the relationships between aspects of identity and gender-related ideology. Measures of social identification, sex-role ideology, and the perception of women's collective disadvantage were completed by 171 women and 91 men who categorized themselves as either traditional, non-traditional or feminist. Factor analysis provided support for a multidimensional conception of gender-derived social identification, with viable subscales reflecting in-group ties, cognitive centrality, and in-group affect. For self-identified non-traditional and feminist women, the cognitive centrality of gender was greater, and more consistently related to gender-related ideology, than for traditional women. Traditional men reported stronger in-group ties and more positive gender-linked affect than did non-traditional men, but men's levels of identification were generally weakly related to gender-related ideology. The utility of considering both multiple dimensions and ideological correlates of group identification is discussed with reference to social identity theory.

Clinical judgments of depression.

In an effort to reevaluate Gough's (1954) classic study of common misconceptions about neuroticism, an investigation was undertaken of the degree to which judges could simulate the Basic Personality Inventory (BPI) responses of a clinically depressed patient group. Judgments were recorded of the probability of responding to each of 240 BPI items by a total of 56 university student judges. Judges were assigned randomly to one of two information conditions, one that had only the label "clinical depression" and another that had, in addition, a more extensive definition. Judgmental profiles of depressed patients indicated very high reliabilities (.99) across information conditions, a high association with actual profiles of clinically depressed patients, and differentiation from other psychiatric patients and normal controls. Results were interpreted as supporting the accuracy of judgments of psychopathology, particularly when certain preconditions are met, namely, the use of a meaningful construct of psychopathology and the prediction of behavior relevant to that construct.