Prospective study of biliary strictures to determine the predictors of malignancy.

BACKGROUND: There have been few prospective studies regarding the investigation of biliary strictures, principally because of rapid technological change. The present study was designed to determine the sensitivity of various imaging studies for the detection of biliary strictures. Serum biochemistry and imaging studies were evaluated for their role in distinguishing benign from malignant strictures. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with suspected noncalculus biliary obstruction were enrolled consecutively in the study. A complete biochemical profile, ultrasound, Disida scan and cholangiogram (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] or percutaneous cholangiogram) were obtained at study entry. Stricture etiology was determined based on cytology, biopsy and/or clinical follow-up at one year. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 31 patients had biliary strictures, of which 15 were malignant. The mean age of the malignant cohort was 73.9 years versus 53.9 years in the benign cohort (P<0.001). Statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups, respectively, were as follows: alanine transaminase 235.2 versus 66.9 U/L (P=0.004), aspartate transaminase 189.8 versus 84.5 U/L (P=0.011), alkaline phosphatase 840.2 versus 361.1 U/L (P=0.002), bilirubin 317.8 versus 22.1 micromol/L (P<0. 001) and bile acids 242.5 versus 73.2 micromol/L (P=0.001). Threshold analysis using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that a bilirubin level of 75 micromol/L was most predictive of malignant strictures. Intrahepatic duct dilation was present in 93% of malignant strictures versus 36% of benign strictures (P=0.002). Common hepatic duct dilation was less discriminatory (malignant 13.5 versus benign 9.6 mm; P=0.11). Ultrasound was highly sensitive (93%) in the detection of the primary tumour in the bile duct or pancreas, or in the visualization of nodal or liver metastases. In benign disease, ultrasound failed to detect evidence of intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary dilation in most cases. Disida scans were not able to distinguish between malignant or benign strictures and could not accurately localize the level of obstruction. The sensitivity of Disida scan for the diagnosis of obstruction was 50%. Cholangiographic characterization of strictures revealed an equal distribution of smooth (eight of 13) and irregular (five of 13) strictures in the malignant group. Ten of 13 benign strictures were characterized as smooth. Malignant strictures were significantly longer than benign ones - 30.3 versus 9.2 mm (P=0.001). Threshold analysis using ROC curves showed that strictures greater than or equal to 14 mm were predictive of malignancy (sensitivity 78%, specificity 75%, log odds ratio 11.23). CONCLUSIONS: A serum bilirubin level of 75 micromol/L or higher, or a stricture length of greater than 14 mm was highly predictive of malignancy in patients with a biliary stricture. Ultrasound was useful in predicting malignant strictures by detecting either intrahepatic duct dilation or by visualizing the tumour (primary or metastases). Strictures with a 'benign' cholangiographic appearance are frequently malignant. Disida scan did not add additional information. ERCP is necessary to diagnose benign strictures, which tend to be less extensive at presentation.

Defining the role of fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in the investigation of patients presenting with bright red rectal bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: This study was done to determine whether sigmoidoscopy could theoretically constitute sufficient investigation for some patients with bright red rectal bleeding. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three patients undergoing investigative colonoscopy for bright red rectal bleeding and whose source of bleeding was identified were studied. The investigation took place in a large urban hospital over an 11-month period. Data obtained included changes in stool pattern, characteristics of the bleeding, lesions identified, and the distance of the lesion from the anus. RESULTS: In patients younger than 55 yr, all serious lesions except for one malignancy in a patient with massive bleeding lay within 60 cm of the anus and theoretically within reach of the fiberoptic sigmoidoscope. The mixing of red blood with stool was commonly due to distal lesions, especially hemorrhoids. CONCLUSIONS: In young persons with bright red rectal bleeding, fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy may prove to constitute appropriate initial investigation.

Endoscopists' opinions of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether endoscopists and general internists agreed with the characterization of appropriateness for endoscopy of various clinical scenarios, as previously reported by the RAND Corporation. DESIGN: Mail survey. STUDY SAMPLE: All endoscopists in western Canada and a random sample of general internists who did not perform endoscopy. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 179 endoscopists in western Canada who were asked to rate the 53 scenarios for endoscopy on a nine-point scale ranging from most appropriate to most inappropriate. A similar questionnaire was sent to 39 general internists practising in the province of Alberta. RESULTS: Response rate was 72% of endoscopists (n = 128) and 64% of general internists (n = 25). Among the endoscopists, there was agreement with the RAND classification for 32 scenarios. All 18 indications previously thought to be appropriate were considered to be appropriate. However, endoscopists agreed with only six of 16 equivocal and eight of 19 indications considered inappropriate. Discrepancies were reviewed by five experienced endoscopists and most appeared to be related to a concern regarding possible malignancy linked in part with the definition of failure to respond to medical therapy; and to a refusal to request a barium meal before endoscopy. Among general internists, there was agreement with RAND in 26 scenarios. When the appropriateness rankings of endoscopists and general internists were compared, there was agreement in 40 of 53 scenarios. Significant discrepancies in ratings were identified in scenarios in which barium studies were described as being normal, known or not done. CONCLUSIONS: The equivocal and inappropriate ratings developed by the RAND Corporation are not uniformly accepted by the endoscopy community or general internists. Use of the RAND indications for assessing quality assurance can be challenged.