Conversion of osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture severity score to osteoporosis T-score equivalent status: A framework study for older Chinese men.

Objectives: To define what portion of older community men with what severity of radiographic osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture (OLVF) correspond to what low T-score status. Methods: There were 755 community Chinese men (age: 76.4 ± 6.7 years) with thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs, and hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density measures. For each vertebra in a subject, a score of 0, -0.5, -1, -1.5, -2, -2.5, and -3 was assigned for no OLVF or OLVF of <20%, ≥ 20-25%, ≥ 2 5%-1/3, ≥ 1/3-40%, ≥ 40%-2/3, and ≥ 2/3 vertebral height loss, respectively. OLVFss was defined as the summed score of vertebrae T4 to L5. OLVFss and T-scores were ranked from the smallest to the largest values. Results: OLVFss of -2, -2.5, -3, corresponded to a mean femoral neck T-score of -2.297 (range: -2.355∼-2.247), -2.494 (range: -2.637∼ -2.363), and -2.773 (range: -2.898∼-2.643), a mean hip T-score of-2.311 (range: -2.420∼-2.234), -2.572 (range: -2.708∼-2.432), -2.911 (range: -3.134∼-2.708), a mean lumbar spine T-score of -2.495 (range: -2.656∼-2.403), -2.931 (range: -3.255∼-2.664), and -3.369 (range: -3.525∼-3.258). The Pearson correlation value of OLVFss and T-score of femoral neck, hip and lumbar spine was r = 0.21, 0.26, and 0.22 (all P < 0.0001). Conclusions: A single severe grade radiological OLVF (≥ 40% height loss) or OLVFss ≤ -2.5 suggest the subject is osteoporotic, and a single collapse grade (≥ 2/3 height loss) OLVF or OLVFss ≤ -3 meets osteoporosis diagnosis criterion. The results highlight the difficulty of diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral fractures among Chinese older men.

'Healthier Chinese spine': an update of osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) and in women (MsOS) Hong Kong spine radiograph studies.

For the MrOS (Hong Kong) and MsOS (Hong Kong) baseline (BL) studies, community-dwelling 2,000 Chinese men (mean age: 72.3 years) and 2,000 Chinese women (mean age: 72.5 years) were recruited from 2001 to 2003. These two studies have spanned two decades till now. This review summarizes our spine radiograph results. Senile and post-menopausal osteoporosis were associated with intervertebral disc volume reduction; and in women, menopause accelerates disc degeneration. Elderly women's osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) prevalence was double of that of elderly men. For year-4 follow-up (FU), male participants with BL OVF had little increased risk for further OVF. In our study comparing OVF rates in age-matched Hong Kong Chinese women and Italian Caucasian women (mean age: 74.1 years), endplate and/or cortex fracture (ECF) prevalence was 26% for Chinese and 47% for Italian. OVF with ≥40% vertebral height loss was recorded among 9.5% of the Chinese subjects while among 26% of the Italian subjects. OVFs in Italian subjects were more likely to be multiple and generally severer. Clinical spine fractures were recorded 133 cases/100,000 person-years in MrOS (Hong Kong) participants and 273 cases/100,000 person-years in MsOS (Hong Kong) participants. Literature review suggests the clinical vertebral fracture rates among elderly Hong Kong Chinese subjects are approximately half of those of American, Australian, and Canadian subjects. Data synthesis suggests elderly Caucasians have a higher degenerative spondylolisthesis prevalence, being approximately 70% higher than that of elderly Hong Kong Chinese. Literature review of other authors' publications shows, compared with Caucasians, Chinese have a much lower incident rate of back pain. We conclude that elderly Chinese have a generally healthier spine relative to elderly Caucasians.

Correction: Electronic Cognitive Screen Technology for Screening Older Adults With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Community Setting: Development and Validation Study.

[This corrects the article DOI: .].

Electronic Cognitive Screen Technology for Screening Older Adults With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Community Setting: Development and Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: A digital cognitive test can be a useful and quick tool for the screening of cognitive impairment. Previous studies have shown that the diagnostic performance of digital cognitive tests is comparable with that of conventional paper-and-pencil tests. However, the use of commercially available digital cognitive tests is not common in Hong Kong, which may be due to the high cost of the tests and the language barrier. Thus, we developed a brief and user-friendly digital cognitive test called the Electronic Cognitive Screen (EC-Screen) for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia of older adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the EC-Screen for the detection of MCI and dementia in older adults. METHODS: The EC-Screen is a brief digital cognitive test that has been adapted from the Rapid Cognitive Screen test. The EC-Screen uses a cloud-based platform and runs on a tablet. Participants with MCI, dementia, and cognitively healthy controls were recruited from research clinics and the community. The outcomes were the performance of the EC-Screen in distinguishing participants with MCI and dementia from controls, and in distinguishing participants with dementia from those with MCI and controls. The cohort was randomly split into derivation and validation cohorts based on the participants' disease group. In the derivation cohort, the regression-derived score of the EC-Screen was calculated using binomial logistic regression. Two predictive models were produced. The first model was used to distinguish participants with MCI and dementia from controls, and the second model was used to distinguish participants with dementia from those with MCI and controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were calculated. The performances of the two predictive models were tested using the validation cohorts. The relationship between the EC-Screen and paper-and-pencil Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Hong Kong version (HK-MoCA) was evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 126 controls, 54 participants with MCI, and 63 participants with dementia were included in the study. In differentiating participants with MCI and dementia from controls, the AUC of the EC-Screen in the derivation and validation cohorts was 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The optimal sensitivity and specificity in the derivation cohorts were 0.81 and 0.80, respectively. In differentiating participants with dementia from those with MCI and controls, the AUC of the derivation and validation cohorts was 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. The optimal sensitivity and specificity in the derivation cohort were 0.83 and 0.83, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the EC-Screen and HK-MoCA (r=-0.67, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EC-Screen is suggested to be a promising tool for the detection of MCI and dementia. This test can be self-administered or assisted by a nonprofessional staff or family member. Therefore, the EC-Screen can be a useful tool for case finding in primary health care and community settings.