RESUMO
Background: Compassionate extubation (CE) refers to withdrawing mechanical ventilation and allowing a patient to die peacefully at the end of life. The primary objective of this pilot study was to quantify the emotional impact of CE on Respiratory Therapists (RT) and Registered Nurses (RNs). Methods: This pilot survey was conducted between March and April 2021 at an academic medical center among RTs and RNs. It included questions on participants' demographics, work characteristics, and Impact of Events (IES) scale to assess the subjective stress caused by CE. Data were analyzed using descriptive and χ2 statistics. Results: Among 20 participants, 18 (90%) were females, 12 (60%) were in the 20-40-year age group, 12 (60%) were RTs, and 8 (40%) RNs. Around 15 (75%) participants worked day shifts with a weekly average of 3-4 shifts, and 14 (70%) performed/observed CE within 1 month before taking this survey. CE performed/observed in a month was ≤2 among 15 (75%) and 3-5 among 4 (20%) participants. Mean total IES score was 16.7 (12.3) among all participants representing 7 (35%) having low, 6 (30%) moderate, and 7 (35%) high emotional impact when performing CE. Risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was present in 6 (30%) participants. A significantly higher number of participants in the low impact group were satisfied with the institutional CE process (p = 0.043) than those in the medium/high impact group. Conclusion: This pilot study findings reveal that RTs and RNs experience moderate to high levels of subjective stress when performing CE. One-third of the survey participants were at risk of developing PTSD.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Moral distress in the intensive care unit contributes to negative emotional experiences in nurses and adversely affects patient care. This prospective cohort study evaluates an intervention designed to improve nurse moral distress in the medical intensive care unit and assesses patient outcomes which may improve moral distress. METHODS: Nurse moral distress was measured before and after an intervention of triggered palliative consults and scheduled family meetings in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient outcomes in the intervention medical intensive care unit were compared to a control group. RESULTS: Forty-eight nurses (n = 48/78, 62%) completed the pre-intervention survey and 33 (n = 33/78, 42%) completed the post-intervention survey. Nurse moral distress using the MMD-HP scale pre- and post-intervention (122.5 vs. 134.0, P = 0.1210) was not statistically different. Intervention group patients (n = 57/64, 89%) had earlier transition to do not resuscitate status (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.0, P = 0.0294), higher rate of documented alternate decision makers (100% vs. 61%, P < 0.0001), and higher rate discharged to a facility (28% vs. 14%) or hospice (19% vs. 7%) (P = 0.0090). Intervention group patients with a do not resuscitate (DNR) order had lower median length of stay in the intensive care unit (4 days vs. 13 days, P = 0.0004) and hospital (10 days vs. 21 days, P = 0.0005), and lower median total hospital costs per patient ($39,067 vs. $116,476, P = 0.0029) when compared control group patients with a DNR order. CONCLUSION: Triggered palliative consults with scheduled family meetings were not associated with change in nurse moral distress. More research is needed to uncover methods to improve nurse moral distress in the intensive care unit.
