Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Plant Sci ; 15: 1328006, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751833

RESUMO

Introduction: Humic substances (HS) are increasingly being applied as crop plant biostimulants because they have been shown to increase plant productivity, especially under environmentally stressful conditions. There has been intense interest in elucidating the HS molecular structures responsible for eliciting the plant biostimulant response (PBR). The polar and weakly acidic carboxylic (COOH) and phenolic hydroxyl (ArOH) functional groups play major roles in the acid nature, pH dependent solubilities, conformation, and metal- and salt-binding capabilities of HS. Reports on the role played by these groups in the PBR of HS found growth parameters being both positively and negatively correlated with COOH and ArOH functionalities. Materials and methods: To investigate the role of COOH and ArOH in HS biostimulant activity we used a humic acid (HA), purified from an oxidized sub bituminous coal to prepare HAs with COOH groups methylated (AHA), ArOH groups acetylated (OHA), and with both COOH and ArOH groups methylated (FHA). The original HA was designated (NHA). The four HAs were subjected to elemental, 13C-NMR, FTIR, and EPR analyses and their antioxidant properties were assessed using the trolox equivalents antioxidant capacity assay (TEAC). 13C-NMR and FTIR analysis revealed significant alkylation/acetylation. To determine the effects of alkylating/acetylating these functional groups on the HA elicited PBR, the HAs were evaluated in a plant bioassay on corn (Zea mays L.) seedling under nutrient and non-nutrient stressed conditions. Treatments consisted of the four HAs applied to the soil surface at a concentration of 80 mg C L-1, in 50 ml DI H2O with the control plants receiving 50ml DI H2O. Results: The HA-treated plants, at both fertilization rates, were almost always significantly larger than their respective control plants. However, the differences produced under nutrient stress were always much greater than those produced under nutrient sufficiency, supporting previous reports that HA can reduce the effects of stress on plant growth. In addition, for the most part, the HAs with the alkylated/acetylated groups produced plants equal to or larger than plants treated with NHA. Conclusion: These results suggests that COOH and ArOH groups play a limited or no role in the HA elicited PBR. Alternatively, the HA pro-oxidant to antioxidant ratio may play a role in the magnitude of the biostimulant response.

2.
J Vis Exp ; (181)2022 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35377366

RESUMO

The purpose of this method is to provide an accurate and precise concentration of humic (HA) and/or fulvic acids (FA) in soft coals, humic ores and shales, peats, composts and humic substance-containing commercial products. The method is based on the alkaline extraction of test materials, using 0.1 N NaOH as an extractant, and separation of the alkaline soluble humic substances (HS) from nonsoluble products by centrifugation. The pH of the centrifuged alkaline extract is then adjusted to pH 1 with conc. HCl, which results in precipitation of the HA. The precipitated HA are separated from the fulvic fraction (FF) (the fraction of HS that remains in solution,) by centrifugation. The HA is then oven or freeze dried and the ash content of the dried HA determined. The weight of the pure (i.e., ash-free) HA is then divided by the weight of the sample and the resulting fraction multiplied by 100 to determine the % HA in the sample. To determine the FA content, the FF is loaded onto a hydrophobic DAX-8 resin, which adsorbs the FA fraction also referred to as the hydrophobic fulvic acid (HFA). The remaining non-fulvic acid fraction, also called the hydrophilic fulvic fraction (HyFF) is then removed by washing the resin with deionized H2O until all nonabsorbed material is completely removed. The FA is then desorbed with 0.1 N NaOH. The resulting Na-fulvate is then protonated by passing it over a strong H+-exchange resin. The resulting FA is oven or freeze dried, the ash content determined and the concentration in the sample calculated as described above for HA.


Assuntos
Benzopiranos , Substâncias Húmicas , Carvão Mineral , Solo
3.
Front Plant Sci ; 12: 758424, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34925408

RESUMO

For legal reasons, the publisher has withdrawn this article from public view. For additional information, please contact the publisher.

4.
Front Plant Sci ; 12: 660224, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34122481

RESUMO

The increasing demands for biostimulants in the agricultural market over the last years have posed the problem of regulating this product category by requiring the industry to make available the information about efficacy and safety, including the explanation of mode of action and the definition of bioactive constituents. In the present study, we tested the biostimulant proprieties of a sedimentary shale ore-extracted humic acid (HA) on Micro Tom tomato plants under increasing nutritional stress and investigated the correlation with the chemical features of HA by means of ultra-high resolution FT-ICR MS, FT-ATR, and 13C-NMR. Humic acid application proved effective in alleviating the nutritional stress by improving nutrient use efficiency, with results comparable to the control treatment supplied with higher NPK nutrition. Increased yield (up to +19%) and fruit quality (in the range +10-24%), higher ascorbic acid content and a better root growth were the main parameters affected by HA application. Molecular-level characterization identified the possible chemical drivers of bioactivity, and included flavonoids, quinones, and alkaloids among the most represented molecules, some of which exhibiting antioxidant, pro-oxidant, and antimicrobial activity. The redox effect was discussed as a determinant of the delicate homeostasis balance, capable of triggering plant defense response and eventually inducing a protective priming effect on the plants.

5.
J AOAC Int ; 97(3): 721-30, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25051616

RESUMO

Increased use of humic substances in agriculture has generated intense interest among producers, consumers, and regulators for an accurate and reliable method to quantify humic acid (HA) and fulvic acid (FA) in raw ores and products. Here we present a thoroughly validated method, the new standardized method for determination of HA and FA contents in raw humate ores and in solid and liquid products produced from them. The methods used for preparation of HA and FA were adapted according to the guidelines of the International Humic Substances Society involving alkaline extraction followed by acidification to separate HA from the fulvic fraction. This is followed by separation of FA from the fulvic fraction by adsorption on a nonionic macroporous acrylic ester resin at acid pH. It differs from previous methods in that it determines HA and FA concentrations gravimetrically on an ash-free basis. Critical steps in the method, e.g., initial test portion mass, test portion to extract volume ratio, extraction time, and acidification of alkaline extract, were optimized for maximum and consistent recovery of HA and FA. The method detection limits for HA and FA were 4.62 and 4.8 mg/L, respectively. The method quantitation limits for HA and FA were 14.7 and 15.3 mg/L, respectively.


Assuntos
Benzopiranos/análise , Substâncias Húmicas/análise , Adsorção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...