Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Cetoacidose Diabética/diagnóstico , Enfisema/diagnóstico , Pielonefrite/diagnóstico , Glicemia/análise , Meios de Contraste , Estado Terminal/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Cetoacidose Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progressão da Doença , Enfisema/cirurgia , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Pielonefrite/cirurgia , Doenças Raras , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia Doppler/métodosRESUMO
We describe a 70-year-old male with a history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and asthma who presented with increasing breathlessness for 5 months. He was diagnosed to have allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) by serological and radiographic criteria. He was treated with steroids and itraconazole. After initial improvement, he developed fever with cough and mucopurulent sputum. X-ray chest revealed multiple cavities with air fluid level. Patient was treated with antibiotics without any response. Sputum was negative for acid fast bacilli (AFB). Sputum culture for bacteria and fungus did not reveal any significant growth; however a delayed growth of Nocardia was noted on fungal plates. Modified Ziehl Nelsen stain was positive for AFB. Patient was treated with cotrimoxazole. We discuss the serological and radiological criteria of ABPA, presentation and treatment of nocardia pulmonary infection and other possible causes of necrotizing pneumonia in immunocompromised settings.
RESUMO
UNLABELLED: A single randomized trial evaluated the use of intravenous cyclosporine treatment for severe attacks of ulcerative colitis. The perceived efficacy and safety of this intervention were measured through a survey of the membership of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG). METHODS: All CAG members were mailed a survey with questions regarding their familiarity with the data supporting the use of cyclosporine, their perception of the efficacy and toxicity of the drug, and whether patients who fail conventional treatment should receive this therapy. The proportion of respondents who had used cyclosporine to treat severe ulcerative colitis was determined. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one responses were received (34% response rate). Sixty-four per cent of respondents were academic faculty members and 82% treated patients with severe colitis. Using multivariate analyses, positive associations were found between the respondents' age (P = 0.004) and subspecialty training in gastroenterology (P = 0.001), and whether respondents treat patients with severe ulcerative colitis. Twenty-six per cent of individuals had prescribed cyclosporine for this indication, of whom 88% were in academic practice (P = 0.007). Over 90% of respondents believe that further clinical trials are needed before cyclosporine becomes accepted as standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of cyclosporine is measurable among Canadian gastroenterologists, the majority believe that further clinical trials are necessary before the drug is accepted as a standard therapy.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Canadá , Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Injeções Intravenosas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança , Sociedades Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
SUMMARY: : We evaluated the use of utility measurements to assess the quality of life of patients with Crohn's disease. Utility scores were obtained using the Time Trade-Off (TTO), Standard Gamble, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) methods in 180 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease. The mean utility scores of patients with a spectrum of disease severity were compared with other measures of disease activity to assess the operating properties of these instruments. All methods of utility estimation yielded lower mean scores in patients with more severe disease. (Remission versus chronically active, therapy resistant disease: TTO 0.96 versus 0.88; Standard Gamble 0.88 versus 0.74; VAS 0.84 versus 0.61). TTO scores were consistently higher than those derived by the other methods (p = 0.001). The utility scores were reliable in patients who were stable (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.55-0.84), but were less responsive than the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (responsiveness ratio 0.97-1.3 versus 2.10) to changes in disease severity. Patients with active Crohn's disease have decreased quality of life as measured by utility scores. Although utilities are valid and reliable quality of life assessments, they are less responsive than other measures of outcome used for clinical trials.