Kidney disease and risk of venous thromboembolism: a nationwide population-based case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is associated with hemostatic derangements, including both procoagulant activity and platelet dysfunction, which may influence the risk of venous thromboembolism. However, data associating kidney disease with risk of venous thromboembolism are sparse. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether kidney disease is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We conducted this nationwide case-control study using data from medical databases. We included 128,096 patients with a hospital diagnosis of VTE in Denmark between 1980 and 2010 (54,473 had pulmonary embolism and 73,623 had deep venous thrombosis only) and 642,426 age- and gender-matched population controls based on risk-set sampling. We identified all previous hospital diagnoses of kidney disease, including nephrotic syndrome, glomerulonephritis without nephrotic syndrome, hypertensive nephropathy, chronic pyelonephritis/interstitial nephritis, polycystic kidney disease, diabetic nephropathy, or other kidney diseases. We used conditional logistic regression models to compute odds ratios (ORs) for venous thromboembolism with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: Kidney disease was associated with an adjusted OR for venous thromboembolism ranging from 1.41 (95% CI, 1.22-1.63) for hypertensive nephropathy to 2.89 (95% CI, 2.26-3.69) for patients with nephrotic syndrome. The association was strongest within the first 3 months after a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (adjusted OR for nephrotic syndrome = 23.23; 95% CI, 8.58-62.89), gradually declining thereafter. The risk, however, remained elevated for more than 5 years, especially in patients with nephrotic syndrome and glomerulonephritis. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney diseases, in particular nephrotic syndrome and glomerulonephritis, were associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.

Use of oral bisphosphonates and risk of venous thromboembolism: a population-based case-control study.

UNLABELLED: Oral bisphosphonates are widely used for fracture prevention, but there is a concern regarding potential adverse cardiovascular effects of bisphosphonates. In this large, population-based case-control study, we found no evidence of an association between bisphosphonate use and risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). INTRODUCTION: We examined the relation between the use of oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis and the risk of VTE. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study in Northern Denmark (population, 1.7 million). Using the Danish National Registry of Patients, we identified all women with a first-time hospital diagnosis of VTE between 1999 and 2006. For each case, we selected up to ten female population controls, matched on date of the index VTE event and age. Data on use of oral bisphosphonates, other medications, and comorbidity were obtained from medical databases. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) for VTE associated with bisphosphonate users while adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Four thousand one hundred ninety-three cases and 41,197 controls were included in the study. One hundred forty-nine cases (3.6%) and 1,078 controls (2.6%) were current bisphosphonate users. The adjusted OR for VTE among the current bisphosphonate users compared with nonusers was 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-1.26), and when restricted to cases of unprovoked thromboembolism, the adjusted OR was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.82-1.42). There was no association either for pulmonary embolism or for deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence of an association of oral bisphosphonate use with the risk of VTE.