Short-Term Repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography at 3.0T: Effects of Motion-Encoding Gradient Direction, Slice Position, and Meal Ingestion.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can estimate liver stiffness (LS) noninvasively. We prospectively assessed whether motion-encoding gradient (MEG) direction, slice position, or high-caloric food intake affects the repeatability of MRE measurements of LS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers (8 women, 12 men; age, 48 ± 12 years) were imaged in a 3.0T scanner at four timepoints: twice after overnight fasting (B1 , B2 ) and twice after consuming a 1050-calorie standardized meal (A1 , A2 ; after 30 and 60 min, respectively). Each session comprised sequential MRE acquisitions in which MEG was applied in three orthogonal directions with three slices positioned over the liver for each. Between sessions, the participants were repositioned to assess test-retest reproducibility. RESULTS: The LS measurements before/after food intake were 3.36 ± 1.31 kPa/3.22 ± 1.03 kPa, 2.04 ± 0.33 kPa/2.27 ± 0.38 kPa, and 2.47 ± 0.50 kPa/2.64 ± 0.76 kPa for MEG superimposed along the anterior-posterior (AP), foot-head (FH), and right-left (RL) directions, respectively. Before and after food intake, LS estimates were lower and more reproducible (<10% coefficient of variation) when the MEG was in the FH direction, not the AP or RL direction. Liver stiffness estimates were significantly elevated after meal consumption when the MEG was in the FH direction (P < 0.05 for B1 vs. A1 , B1 vs. A2 , B2 vs. A1 , and B2 vs. A2 ). CONCLUSION: MRE estimates of LS were highly reproducible, particularly when MEG was applied in the FH direction, suggesting that this method could be used for long-term monitoring of antifibrotic therapy without repeated biopsies. High-caloric food intake resulted in slightly elevated LS on MRE.

Tissue characterization of myocardial infarction using T1rho: influence of contrast dose and time of imaging after contrast administration.

PURPOSE: To determine whether contrast between acutely infarcted and normal myocardia in T1-rho-weighted cine TFE (T1rho-TFE) and delayed-enhancement (DE) images (measured using a metric percent enhancement (PE)) varied with the dose or time of imaging after contrast administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were randomly divided into three groups according to the dose of gadoversetamide (0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mmol/kg) administered. After contrast administration, T1rho-TFE images were acquired at five and 40 minutes, and DE images were acquired at 10 and 30 minutes. RESULTS: For T1rho-TFE imaging the PE values at 40 minutes were 70+/-14, 98+/-14, and 105+/-41 at 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol/kg dose levels, which were significantly greater than the corresponding PEs at five minutes after contrast administration (44+/-12, 71+/-14, and 36+/-13). For DE and T1rho-TFE imaging the dose of contrast agent did not significantly affect the PE. However, with DE the PE tended to increase with the dose. At all dose levels, irreversible injury was more conspicuous in T1rho-TFE images acquired at 40 minutes than at five minutes after contrast. CONCLUSION: In T1rho-TFE, acute infarction was more conspicuous in images acquired at a later time point, and the PE did not vary with the contrast dose.

Assessing myocardial viability and infarct transmurality with left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with stable coronary artery disease: validation by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to define myocardial viability and establish practical cut-off values for differentiating normal myocardial tissue from subendocardial and transmural scar tissue by using electromechanical mapping (EMM). We validated our results by delayed-enhancement cardiac MRI (DE-MRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 15 ambulatory patients with stable coronary disease who were candidates for cardiac catheterization. Within 48 hours of EMM, DE-MRI was performed. Using EMM software, we created a bull's eye precisely matched to that generated by DE-MRI. Segment by segment, we compared the MRI results to the corresponding unipolar voltage value for that same segment in the EMM bull's eye. Of 300 total segments, 275 were compared. The segments were divided into normal (n=211), subendocardial scar (n=49), and transmural scar (n=15). We found that subendocardial (6.8+/-2.9 mV) and transmural (4.6+/-1.9 mV) scar segments had significantly less unipolar voltage than normal (11.6+/-4.5 mV) segments (P<0.05 for each comparison). When normal myocardium was compared with myocardium with subendocardial scar, the threshold for differentiating between the two areas was 7.9 mV (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 80%). Comparison of normal tissue to transmural scar yielded a threshold of 6.9 mV (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that normal myocardium can be accurately distinguished from myocardium with subendocardial or transmural infarcts on the basis of unipolar voltage values obtained through EMM. This is the first study to validate these results by using cardiac DE-MRI in humans.