Determination of Cleaning Limits Considering Toxicological Risk Evaluation to Minimize the Risk of Cross Contamination.

The historical approaches that have been used to establish cleaning validation acceptance limits should be updated to recent approaches to prevent cross contamination. In the present investigation, a cleaning method was validated using high performance liquid chromatography. Method modification critical parameters including spiking, swab sampling from PVC, Stainless Steel, and Polyethylene, extraction technique from swab, solubility, potency, toxicity (LD50), and improvement of limit of detection (LOD) of the method through analytical method validation were studied. In addition, roughness, mechanical and electro-polishing, consideration of dosage form as a quantitative factor, acceptable daily exposure (ADE), and permitted daily exposure (PDE) in the worst-case determination were considered in the study. The method was validated based on USP and ICH guidelines for specificity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, precision, accuracy, linearity, and range. Linear regression analysis of data for the calibration plot in the range of 7.43, 10.89, 21.78, 43.56, 87.12 µg/mL, and relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) found to be 0.5, 0.4, 0.2, and 0.2, respectively with correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.999997. The LOD and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) were 2.23 and 7.43 µg/mL, respectively. Good recoveries in the range of 73.65-81.20%, and precision with relative standard deviation values lower than 15% have been obtained. The proposed method developed for cleaning validation is specific, precise, and useful for determination of cleaning acceptance limits using health-based limit and Quality Risk Management to develop an appropriate cleaning program for engineering design, safety of patients, and worker protection.

Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants.

A cleaning validation for a family of compounds utilizing swab sampling and rinse solution procedures, and high performance liquid chromatography for separation and detection of the analytes was performed.Effective parameters on recovery including sampling method, swab characteristics, solvent, swabbing technique, and material substance of product contact surfaces within the manufacturing equipment for swab and rinse sampling method, quantitative cleaning verification method, and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) level and nature have been studied.The limit of detection and the limit of quantitation for the HPLC method were determined to be 0.0198 µg/mL, and 0.0495 µg/mL of the analyte, respectively. The linearity on replicate injections of the standard prepared in the range of 0.78, 1.55, 3.1, and 6.2 µg/mL, and relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) found to be 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, and 0.6, respectively with correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.9999. Recovery coverage for each type of surface was acceptable, ranging from 63.88% for swab sampling of stainless steel to 97.85% for rinse sampling of PVC. The acceptance criteria for precision on replicate injections of the analyte prepared in three concentration levels covering the specified range of 50, 100, and 200% was successfully accomplished R.S.D. lower than 15% for recovery results.Thus, choosing the appropriate sampling method, swab type, and surface condition can affect and increase recovery rate determination efficiency.