Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training versus Continuous Training on Physical Fitness, Cardiovascular Function and Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Physical fitness is an important prognostic factor in heart failure (HF). To improve fitness, different types of exercise have been explored, with recent focus on high-intensity interval training (HIT). We comprehensively compared effects of HIT versus continuous training (CT) in HF patients NYHA II-III on physical fitness, cardiovascular function and structure, and quality of life, and hypothesize that HIT leads to superior improvements compared to CT. METHODS: Twenty HF patients (male:female 19:1, 64±8 yrs, ejection fraction 38±6%) were allocated to 12-weeks of HIT (10*1-minute at 90% maximal workload-alternated by 2.5 minutes at 30% maximal workload) or CT (30 minutes at 60-75% of maximal workload). Before and after intervention, we examined physical fitness (incremental cycling test), cardiac function and structure (echocardiography), vascular function and structure (ultrasound) and quality of life (SF-36, Minnesota living with HF questionnaire (MLHFQ)). RESULTS: Training improved maximal workload, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) related to the predicted VO2peak, oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold, and maximal oxygen pulse (all P<0.05), whilst no differences were present between HIT and CT (N.S.). We found no major changes in resting cardiovascular function and structure. SF-36 physical function score improved after training (P<0.05), whilst SF-36 total score and MLHFQ did not change after training (N.S.). CONCLUSION: Training induced significant improvements in parameters of physical fitness, although no evidence for superiority of HIT over CT was demonstrated. No major effect of training was found on cardiovascular structure and function or quality of life in HF patients NYHA II-III. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register NTR3671.

Adherence to guidelines for the prescribing of double and triple combinations of antithrombotic agents.

BACKGROUND: To prevent cardiovascular complications, sometimes double and triple therapy with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), clopidogrel and/or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) are indicated. These combinations increase the patient's risk of serious bleeding events. Therefore, adherence to clinical guidelines is of the utmost importance when these high-risk therapies are prescribed. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 238 cases in a community pharmacy that were treated with a combination of VKA, clopidogrel and/or ASA between January 2006 and December 2009. Hospital records and community pharmacy records were used to obtain the indication(s), the duration of combination therapy, the presence of risk-increasing and risk-decreasing co-medications and any relevant co-morbidities. The cardiologists' attitudes towards the prescribing of antithrombotic combinations and their self-reported adherence to guidelines were assessed by a brief questionnaire. RESULTS: We found there was no guideline-based indication for 22 of the 146 cases (14%) on ASA plus clopidogrel and 19 of the 82 cases (23%) on VKA plus ASA. Of the 238 cases given antithrombotic combination therapies, 77 (32%) were placed at an additional increased risk of serious gastrointestinal events, yet 43 (56%) of these did not receive adequate gastric protection. Out of the 19 of 60 cardiologists (32%) who responded to our questionnaire; 17 (90%) and 13 (68%) stated that a strict indication is very important when initiating therapy with ASA plus clopidogrel or ASA plus VKA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is room to further develop adherence to guideline-based prescribing of antithrombotic combination therapies and to improve prescription of gastric protection for patients receiving these high-risk combinations.

Silent cardiac ischemia after an ischemic stroke of the right hemisphere.

A patient is described who previously had daily complaints of angina pectoris, yet no longer experienced chest pain after an ischemic stroke of the right hemisphere, despite several recorded episodes of electrocardiographic changes and an elevation of cardiac enzymes compatible with myocardial ischemia. The cingulate gyrus is involved in spatial attention and neglect, and is, according to positron emission tomography studies, less activated in silent myocardial ischemia. We suggest that this patient was not aware of the angina because of putamen ischemia and secondary disturbed projection to the cingulate gyrus and no longer felt or experienced this referred pain.

Prehospital versus hospital fibrinolytic therapy using automated versus cardiologist electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction: abortion of myocardial infarction and unjustified fibrinolytic therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the incidence of abortion of myocardial infarction and of unjustified fibrinolysis by using automated versus cardiologist-assisted diagnosis of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The results of prehospital diagnosis and treatment (2 cities in the Netherlands) were compared with those of inhospital treatment. Unjustified fibrinolysis must be differentiated from justified thrombolysis resulting in aborted myocardial infarction. Both have the absence of a significant rise in cardiac enzymes in common. In aborted myocardial infarction, this is a result of timely reperfusion; in unjustified thrombolysis, this is the result of an incorrect diagnosis. METHODS: In the city of Rotterdam, 118 patients were treated before hospitalization for myocardial infarction, diagnosed through the use of a mobile computer electrocardiogram; in the city of Nijmegen, 132 patients were treated before hospitalization with the use of transtelephonic transmission of the electrocardiogram to the coronary care unit and judged by a cardiologist. Their data were compared with those of 269 patients treated inhospital in the city of Arnhem, using the same electrocardiographic criteria. Abortion of myocardial infarction was diagnosed as the absence of a significant rise in cardiac enzymes and the presence of resolution of chest pain and 50% of ST-segment deviation within 2 hours after onset of therapy. Lacking these, the diagnosis of unjustified fibrinolytic therapy was made. RESULTS: Unjustified treatment occurred in 8 (3.2%) prehospital-treated patients (4 in Rotterdam and 4 in Nijmegen). Of the inhospital-treated patients in Arnhem, 5 (1.9%) were treated unjustifiably (P =.49). Aborted myocardial infarction occurred in 15.3% and 18.2% in Rotterdam and Nijmegen, respectively, against 4.5% in inhospital treatment in Arnhem (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Abortion of myocardial infarction is associated with prehospital thrombolysis. Unjustified fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction occurs in prehospital fibrinolysis as frequently as in the inhospital setting. The use of different electrocardiographic methods for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction does not appear to make any difference.

Prehospital thrombolysis with reteplase: the Nijmegen/Rotterdam study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this observational study was to assess time from electrocardiogram diagnosis to treatment and time from pain onset to treatment with double bolus reteplase compared to current therapy with streptokinase or bolus anistreplase in 2 cities (Rotterdam and Nijmegen) in the Netherlands, where prehospital thrombolysis is an established way of treatment of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Prehospital thrombolysis is performed using electrocardiogram diagnosis by the ambulance service as well as bolus anistreplase for treatment in Nijmegen, and streptokinase infusion in Rotterdam. Reteplase or anistreplase/streptokinase was assigned open label to patients according to order of presentation on a 1-to-1 basis. All patients were treated with nitrates sublingually and aspirin orally. Time intervals were recorded by the ambulance staff. RESULTS: In total, 250 patients were treated between April 1, 1999 and August 1, 2000. Reteplase was used in 120 patients and anistreplase/streptokinase in 130 patients. Using double bolus reteplase resulted in a significantly shorter time to treatment: a median of 81 minutes compared to a median of 104 minutes with the established therapy (P <.0001). There were no differences in mortality, aborted myocardial infarction, hemorrhagic stroke or the need for rescue angioplasty between the groups. CONCLUSION: In prehospital thrombolysis, double bolus reteplase is associated with a shorter time to treatment than bolus anistreplase or infusion of streptokinase.