Comparison of long-term results between radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery and postmastectomy radiotherapy in stage T1-2N1M0 breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) can improve survival for T1-2N1 breast cancer. However, there exists a concern whether BCS plus RT has the same or a superior therapeutic effect as that of mastectomy. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term results between RT after BCS and postmastectomy RT in stage T1-2N1M0 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Totally 1816 pathological stage T1-2N1M0 breast cancer patients were analyzed. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to select 196 pairs of patients between BCS and mastectomy receiving postoperative RT. Five-year locoregional relapse (LRR), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis (DM), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed as endpoints. RESULTS: In the whole group, significant differences were observed in all endpoints (P<0.05) between the no-RT and RT groups. For patients receiving mastectomy, DM, DMFS, DFS and BCSS rates had no differences between the two groups. For patients without RT in the multivariable analysis, the molecular subtype was associated with each endpoint (P<0.05). Age, primary tumor site, tumor size, and LVI status were significantly associated with DM. The analysis of 196 pairs of patients selected by PSM showed that BCS plus RT resulted in a significantly lower 5-year DM rate (P=0.015) and superior survival in terms of the 5-year DMFS (P=0.046), DFS (P=0.049) and BCSS (P=0.024) compared with mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiotherapy remarkably improved survival in T1-2N1M0 breast cancer but not in the mastectomy subgroup, except for LRR and LRFS. Patients with BCS plus RT had better survival compared with those with postmastectomy radiation in terms of DM, DMFS, DFS and BCSS.

The prognosis of neck residue nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients: results from a case-cohort study.

Background: To assess the prognosis of neck residue nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients and the efficacy of neck dissection in the treatment of these patients. Methods: We recruited 68 neck residue NPC patients. For each neck residue patient we had three matched NPC patients without neck residue as controls (n = 204). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and multivariable analysis was used to test the independent statistical significance of NPC patients. Results: Compared to controls, the neck residue patients showed significantly lower 3-year PFS (46.7% vs. 87.6%; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that neck residue was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Conclusions: NPC patients who had pathologically proven neck residue are associated with poor prognosis. Management with neck dissection alone seems not to be sufficient for these patients.

New Clinical Features and Dosimetric Predictor Identification for Symptomatic Radiation Pneumonitis after Tangential Irradiation in Breast Cancer Patients.

Background: Tangential irradiation is the most popular postoperative radiotherapy technique for breast cancer. However, irradiation has been related to symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (SRP), which decreases the quality of life of patients. This study investigated the clinical features and dosimetric parameters related to SRP of the ipsilateral lung to identify risk factors for SRP in breast cancer patients after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) with tangential fields. Material and Methods: A total of 515 breast cancer patients were evaluated and divided into two groups: the local-regional irradiation group (259 patients) and the simple local irradiation group (256 patients). Clinical symptoms were registered and patient data collected. The relationship between the incidence of SRP and dosimetric parameters for the ipsilateral lung was assessed within 6 months after 3D-CRT. Dosimetric parameters were compared using t tests. The dosimetric predictors for SRP were estimated using a logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: In total, 19 patients (3.7%) developed grade 2 SRP. In the local-regional irradiation group, the probability of SRP in the lung body was greater than that in the lung apex (3.9% vs. 1.5%). V20 and V30 were independent predictors for SRP in the local-regional irradiation group (odds ratio = 1.152 and 1.439, both p = 0.030), whereas only V20 was an independent predictor of SRP in the simple local irradiation group (odds ratio = 1.351, p = 0.001). With 39.8% as the optimal threshold for V20 and 25.7% for V30 for local-regional irradiation, SRP could be predicted with an accuracy of 80.3% and 79.9%, a sensitivity of 61.5% and 69.2%, and a specificity of 81.3% and 80.5%, respectively. With 20.2% as the optimal V20 threshold for simple local irradiation, SRP could be predicted with an accuracy of 88.7%, a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 89.6%. Conclusions: SRP has become a rare complication with mild symptoms and occurs mainly in the lung body. V20 and V30 may be useful dosimetric predictors to evaluate SRP risk of the ipsilateral lung in breast cancer.

Validation and comparison of the 7th and 8th edition of AJCC staging systems for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and proposed staging systems from Hong Kong, Guangzhou, and Guangxi.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to validate and compare the 7th and 8th edition of AJCC staging systems for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and proposed staging systems from Hong Kong, Guangzhou, and Guangxi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 899 patients treated between November 5, 2002 and May 27, 2010. Separation and discrimination of each staging system in overall survival were primarily compared. RESULTS: Compared with the 7th AJCC, the 8th AJCC and all proposed staging systems well separated across T-classification. T-classification from Guangzhou seemed to perform best in discrimination (C-index 0.6454), followed by the 8th AJCC (0.6451), the 7th AJCC (0.6386), Hong Kong (0.6376) and Guangxi (0.5889). For N-classification, no staging systems improved the weakness of the 7th AJCC in separating N2 and N1, except that suggestion from Guangzhou showed higher potential (P=0.096). Besides, N-classification from Guangzhou had a C-index of 0.6444, larger than that of the 8th AJCC (0.6235), the 7th AJCC (0.6179), Hong Kong (0.6175) and Guangxi (0.6175). Accordingly, stage group of staging system from Guangzhou showed higher discrimination (C-index 0.6839), compared with the 8th AJCC (0.6791), the 7th AJCC (0.6766), Hong Kong (0.6765) and Guangxi (0.6688), despite that stage I and II remained inseparable (P=0.322). CONCLUSIONS: The 8th AJCC staging system appeared to be better than the 7th AJCC. But the proposed staging system from Guangzhou was more likely to improve the separation and discrimination abilities.

Outcomes of adding induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage T3N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine whether adding induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved survival in stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, especially in low-risk patients at stage T3N0-1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 687 patients with stage T3N0-1 NPC treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy (CC) with or without induction chemotherapy (IC). Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to select 237 pairs of patients from two cohorts. Overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant survival differences were observed between IC plus CC and CC cohorts with similar 4-year OS (91.7% vs 92.6%, P=0.794), LRFS, (92.7% vs 96.8%, P=0.138), DMFS (93.5% vs 94.3%, P=0.582), and PFS (87.5% vs 91.1%, P=0.223). In a univariate analysis, lower Epstein-Barr virus deoxyribonucleic acid (EBV DNA; <4,000 copies/mL) significantly improved 4-year DMFS (95.5% vs 91.6%, P=0.044) compared with higher EBV DNA (≥4,000 copies/mL). No factors were associated with 4-year OS, LRFS, DMFS, and PFS in a multivariate analysis. IC plus CC group experienced higher rates of grade 3-4 leucopenia (P<0.001) and neutropenia (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of IC to CC in stage T3N0-1 NPC patients treated with IMRT did not significantly improve their survival. The IC group experienced higher rates of grade 3-4 hematological toxicities. Therefore, further investigation is required.

Anal adenocarcinoma requires prophylactic inguinal nodal treatment: Results from a single Chinese institution.

BACKGROUND: Literature pertaining to prophylactic inguinal nodal treatment for anal adenocarcinoma in China is scarce. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 126 patients from 1965 to 2015. Among these, 67 patients received surgery only, 18 patients received chemoradiotherapy only, 27 patients received a combination of both, and the remaining 14 patients received palliative treatment. RESULTS: The median follow up period was 30 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 85.8%, 62.5%, and 43.4%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 46.9% for patients with negative inguinal lymph nodes and 19.1% for patients with positive inguinal lymph nodes (p=0.007). The overall 5-year inguinal node relapse-free survival was 83.0%. The 5-year inguinal node relapse-free survival was 87.5% for stage I, 86.9% for stage II, and 76.5% for stage III cancers. Among those with negative inguinal nodes, the 5-year inguinal node relapse-free survival was 85.7% for negative regional lymph nodes and 75.4% for positive regional lymph nodes (p=0.089). CONCLUSION: Inguinal lymph node is a high-risk subclinical area. Prophylactic inguinal nodal treatment is necessary for patients with anal adenocarcinoma irrespective of positive or negative inguinal lymph nodes.

Validation of published nomograms and accordingly individualized induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: We have attempted to validate two published nomograms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and individualize induction chemotherapy (IC) accordingly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2011, 920 patients were included in the study. The validity of the nomograms was assessed by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), areas under the curve (AUC), and calibration curves. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by IC were evaluated in and out of risk stratified patients with and without propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system, Tang's nomogram better discriminated DFS (C-index 0.629 versus 0.569, P=0.002; AUC 0.635 versus 0.576, P=0.018), whereas Yang's nomogram had no advantage in predicting OS (C-index 0.648 versus 0.606, P=0.184; AUC 0.643 versus 0.604, P=0.157). Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed DFS or OS probability. Without risk stratification, patients achieved no benefit from IC in DFS (P⩾0.101) or OS (P⩾0.370). However, among 580 high-risk patients stratified by Tang's nomogram, IC improved five-year DFS from 68.8 to 74.8% (P=0.072), and OS from 82.6 to 87.9% (P=0.065), and the improvement of DFS and OS increased to 9.3% (P=0.019) and 7.3% (P=0.036), respectively, in 426 propensity-matched patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tang's nomogram helps to stratify stage III-IVa-b NPC, and IC is beneficial to high-risk patients in clinical practice.

Retrospective Analysis of the Survival Benefit of Induction Chemotherapy in Stage IVa-b Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The value of adding induction chemotherapy to chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) remains controversial, yet high-risk patients with LA-NPC have poor outcomes after chemoradiotherapy. We aimed to assess the survival benefits of induction chemotherapy in stage IVa-b NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 602 patients with stage IVa-b NPC treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, 5-year OS was 83.2% for induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and 74.8% for concurrent chemotherapy alone, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 8.4% (P = 0.022). Compared to concurrent chemotherapy alone, addition of induction chemotherapy improved 5-year DMFS (83.2% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.018) but not 5-year LRFS (83.7% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.848) or PFS (71.9% vs. 66.0%, P = 0.12). Age, T category, N category, chemotherapy strategy and clinical stage were associated with 5-year OS (P = 0.017, P = 0.031, P = 0.007, P = 0.022, P = 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90, P = 0.012) and DMFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83, P = 0.004). In subgroup analysis, induction chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year DMFS in stage IVa (86.8% vs. 77.3%, P = 0.008), but provided no significant benefit in stage IVb. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage IVa-b NPC treated with IMRT, addition of induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year OS and 5-year DMFS. This study provides a basis for selection of high risk patients in future clinical therapeutic trials.

Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus IMRT Plus Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Matched Study.

PURPOSE: It deserves investigation whether induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is inferior to the current standard of IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy (CC) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: Patients who received IC (94 patients) or CC (302 patients) plus IMRT at our center between March 2003 and November 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity-score matching method was used to match patients in both arms at equal ratio. Failure-free survival (FFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression. RESULTS: In the original cohort of 396 patients, IC plus IMRT resulted in similar FFS (P = .565), OS (P = .334), DMFS (P = .854), and LRFS (P = .999) to IMRT plus CC. In the propensity-matched cohort of 188 patients, no significant survival differences were observed between the two treatment approaches (3-year FFS 80.3% vs 81.0%, P = .590; OS 93.4% vs 92.1%, P = .808; DMFS 85.9% vs 87.7%, P = .275; and LRFS 93.1% vs 92.0%, P = .763). Adjusting for the known prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, IC plus IMRT did not cause higher risk of treatment failure, death, distant metastasis, or locoregional relapse. CONCLUSIONS: IC plus IMRT appeared to achieve comparable survival to IMRT plus CC in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Further investigations were warranted.

Effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Albeit intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is currently the recommended radiation technique in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the effect of IMRT versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2DCRT) alone is still contradictory. RESULTS: In the original unmatched cohort of 1198 patients, IMRT obtained comparable 5-year overall survival (OS) (91.3% vs 87.1%, P = 0.120), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) (92.3% vs 90.4%, P = 0.221) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (92.9% vs 92.1%, P = 0.901) to 2DCRT. In the propensity-matched cohort of 604 patients, no significant survival differences were observed between the two arms (5-year OS 90.9% vs 90.5%, P = 0.655; LRFS 92.5% vs 92.4%, P = 0.866; DMFS 92.5% vs 92.9%, P = 0.384). In multivariate analysis, IMRT did not significantly lower the risk of death, locoregional relapse or distant metastasis, irrespective of tumor stage. METHODS: Overall, 1198 patients who underwent IMRT (316 patients) or 2DCRT (882 patients) without any chemotherapy was retrospectively analyzed. Patients in both arms were matched at equal ratio using propensity-score matching method. OS, LRFS and DMFS were assessed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity-matched study, IMRT showed no survival advantage over 2DCRT alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Evaluation of Body Mass Index and Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Propensity-Matched Analysis: An Observational Case-Control Study.

The effect of pretreatment body mass index on survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains contradictory.All patients (N = 1778) underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Body mass index was categorized as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-22.9 kg/m2), overweight (22.9-27.5 kg/m2), and obesity (≥27.5 kg/m2). Propensity score matching method was used to identify patients with balanced characteristics and treatment regimen. Disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.Following propensity matching, 115 (underweight vs normal), 399 (overweight vs normal), and 93 (obese vs normal) pairs of patients were selected, respectively. In univariate analysis, underweight patients had inferior DSS/OS (P = 0.042) and DMFS (P = 0.025) while both overweight and obese patients showed similar survival across all the endpoints (P ≥ 0.098) to those with normal weight. In multivariate analysis, underweight remained predictive of poor DSS/OS (P = 0.044) and DMFS (P = 0.040), whereas overweight (P ≥ 0.124) or obesity (P ≥ 0.179) was not associated with any type of survival.Underweight increased the risk of death and distant metastasis, whereas overweight or obese did not affect the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This provides support for early nutritional intervention during the long waiting time before treatment.

Long-term outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT: a retrospective study.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A total of 249 patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with IMRT. One hundred forty-three patients treated with CCRT and 106 patients treated with IMRT alone. With a median follow-up of 59.4 months, adding concurrent chemotherapy did not statistically significantly improve the 5-year overall survival (OS) (89.7 % vs 99.0 %, p = 0.278), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) (94.8 % vs 89.3 %, p = 0.167), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) (93.4 % vs 97.5 %, p = 0.349). The patients with CCRT significantly experienced more acute toxic effects. The main grades 3-4 toxicity reactions were mucositis (26.6 % vs 15.1 %, p = 0.03) and leukopenia/neutropenia (9.1 % vs 0.9 %, p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis of patients with concurrent platinum single-agent chemotherapy the 5-year OS (98.4 % vs 81.9 %, p = 0.013) and DMFS (96.9 % vs 84.4 %, p = 0.043) of patients with platinum every 3 weeks (Q3W) were significantly higher than those with platinum weekly (QW) and no significant difference for LRFS (96.8 % vs 90.4 %, p = 0.150). CCRT did not improve the survival of patients with stage II NPC but increased the acute toxicity reactions. Patients with platinum Q3W improved the 5-year OS and DMFS, compared with those with platinum QW.

Pretreatment anemia and survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Due to the low incidence of pretreatment anemia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), the true prognostic impact of pretreatment anemia may be underestimated before. We retrospectively analyzed the association of pretreatment anemia with disease-specific survival (DSS), distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional-relapse-free survival (LRFS) by Cox regression in a cohort of 5830 patients, stratifying by midtreatment anemia, smoking, body mass index (BMI), etc. Pretreatment anemia was significantly associated with adverse DSS (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.62-2.85, P < 0.001) and DMFS (HR = 1.53, 95 % CI 1.08-2.17, P = 0.018), comparing to patients with normal hemoglobin, after adjusting for covariates. Moreover, the association with DSS remained unchanged regardless of smoking status and clinical stage, whereas it was limited in the subgroups of above 45 years, male sex, and BMI <25 kg/m(2). With restriction to midtreatment anemic patients, pretreatment anemia was still strongly correlated with inferior DSS and DMFS. This study, in the largest reported cohort, is the first to show the adverse prognostic impact of pretreatment anemia on DSS and DMFS in NPC.

Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.

BACKGROUND: Patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma were reported to benefit from adding cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy to two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy. But this benefit becomes uncertain in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era, owing to its significant advantage. METHODS: We enrolled 661 low risk (T1N1M0, T2N0-1M0 or T3N0M0, the 2010 UICC/AJCC staging system) patients who underwent IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Particularly, patients with IMRT alone or IMRT plus cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy were equally matched using propensity-score matching method. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 661 patients, IMRT alone achieved parallel OS (P = 0.379), DMFS (P = 0.169) and LRFS (P = 0.849) to IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy. In the propensity-matched cohort of 482 patients, similar survival were observed between both arms (4-years OS 97.4% vs 96.1%, P = 0.134; DMFS 96.5% vs 95.1%, P = 0.763; LRFS 93.8% vs 91.5%, P = 0.715). In multivariate analysis, cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy did not lower the risk of death, distant metastasis or locoregional relapse. And this association remained unchanged in subgroups by age, sex, histology and stage. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients who underwent IMRT could not benefit from cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy.

Effect of taxanes-based induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A large scale propensity-matched study.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of taxanes-based induction chemotherapy (IC) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) was quite contradictory in two phase II randomized controlled trials with small sample size. We aimed to investigate it in this large scale propensity-matched study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 779 LA-NPC patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy with or without taxanes-based IC were included. Patients in both treatment arms were matched using propensity score matching method at the ratio of 1:1. Failure-free survival (FFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: After matching, 534 patients were identified for analysis. In univariate analysis, both treatment arms resulted in parallel survival (4-years FFS 78.0% vs 74.1%, P = 0.304; OS 87.5% vs 87.3%, P = 0.595; DMFS 88.2% vs 84.4%, P = 0.154; and LRFS 91.2% vs 90.1%, P = 0.960). In multivariate analysis, taxanes-based IC did not improve any survival (P ⩾ 0.139). And this association remained unchanged in subgroup analysis by age, sex and histology, and among patients with stage III and T4N0M0. But among patients with T4N1-2M0 and stage IVb, taxanes-based IC significantly prolonged the 4-year DMFS by 11.2% (86.1% vs 74.9%, P = 0.034), and marginally improved FFS (P = 0.133) and OS (P = 0.215) in both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this large scale propensity-matched study, LA-NPC patients could not benefit from taxanes-based IC on the whole. But the risk of distant metastasis significantly decreased by above 10% for patients with T4N1-2M0 and stage IVb.

Significant prognostic impact of chemoradiotherapy-induced hemoglobin decrease on treatment outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate prognostic impact of chemoradiotherapy-induced hemoglobin (Hb) decrease on treatment outcomes of endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and fifteen non-metastatic NPC, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (NACT+RT group) or concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT group), were enrolled in this study, who were regrouped according to pre-radiotherapy Hb (pre-RT Hb), post-radiotherapy Hb (post-RT Hb) and individual Hb decrease through radiotherapy or CCRT (△Hb), respectively. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the COX proportional hazard model and binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: A poorer 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was observed when pre-RT Hb<130.00 g/L. However, post-RT Hb<130.00 g/L was associated with significantly poorer 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (P=0.010) and disease specific survival (DSS) (P=0.008). Multivariate analysis with the COX proportional hazard model identified post-RT Hb<130.00 g/L as an independent negative prognostic factor for both LRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.896; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.158-3.106; P=0.011) and DSS (HR, 1.767; 95% CI, 1.152-2.711; P=0.009). Similarly, △Hb <-15.00 g/L also predicted poorer 5-year LRFS (P=0.024) and DSS (P=0.015), which was confirmed in multivariate analysis as an independent adverse prognostic factor for LRFS (HR, 1.586; 95% CI, 1.058-2.377; P=0.026) and DSS (HR, 1.556; 95% CI, 1.087-2.227; P=0.016), respectively. Multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression model indicated that CCRT was a significantly independent predictor for post-RT Hb <130.00 g/L and △Hb < -15.00 g/L. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiotherapy-induced decreased Hb levels have negative influence on locoregional control and survival, and might counteract the benefit of neoadjuvant/concomitant chemotherapy. Further studies on supportive care to maintain sufficient Hb level during chemo-radiotherapy are warranted.

Leucopenia and treatment efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Leucopenia or neutropenia during chemotherapy predicts better survival in several cancers. We aimed to assess whether leucopenia could be a biological measure of treatment and a marker of efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (ANPC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3826 patients with ANPC who received chemoradiotherapy. Leucopenia was categorised on the basis of worst grade during treatment according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 4.0: no leucopenia (grade 0), mild leucopenia (grade 1-2), and severe leucopenia (grade 3-4). Associations between leucopenia and survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 3826 patients, 2511 (65.6 %) developed mild leucopenia (grade 1-2) and 807 (21.1 %) developed severe leucopenia (grade 3-4) during treatment; 508 (13.3 %) did not. A multivariate Cox model that included leucopenia determined that the hazard ratios (HR) of death for patients with mild and severe leucopenia were 0.69 [95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) 0.56-0.85, p < 0.001] and 0.75 (95 %CI 0.59-0.95, p = 0.019), respectively; the HR of distant metastasis for patients with mild and severe leucopenia were 0.77 (95 %CI 0.61-0.96, p = 0.023) and 0.99 (95 %CI 0.77-1.29, p = 0.995), respectively. Leucopenia had no effect on locoregional relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that mild leucopenia during chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival in ANPC. Mild leucopenia may indicate appropriate dosage of chemotherapy. We can identify the patients who may benefit from chemotherapy if they experienced leucopenia during the treatment. Prospective trials are required to assess whether dosing adjustments based on leucopenia may improve chemotherapy efficacy.

Diabetes, prediabetes and the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a study of 5,860 patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of diabetes is increasing. But the impact of diabetes and prediabetes on survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has received little evaluation. METHODS: In a cohort of 5,860 patients, we compared the disease specific survival (DSS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of patients with diabetes, prediabetes and normoglycemia defined by pretreatment fasting plasma glucose (FPG) using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Comparing to normoglycemic patients, the diabetic and the prediabetic were generally older, fatter, had hypertension, heart diseases and hyperlipaemia and usually received radiotherapy alone. But both the diabetic and the prediabetic had similar DSS, LRFS and DMFS to normoglycemic patients, even adjusting for such important factors as age, gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, heart diseases, body mass index, hyperlipaemia, titer of VCA-IgA and EA-IgA, pathology, T-stage, N-stage, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P>0.05 for all). Additionally, the findings remained unchanged in sensitivity analysis by excluding patients with known diabetes history and in subgroups of the various factors. CONCLUSIONS: The diabetic and prediabetic NPC patients had similar survival to normoglycemic NPC patients. These data, in the largest reported cohort, are the first to evaluate the association between diabetes, prediabetes and the survival in NPC. The findings are relevant to patient management and provided evidence of the effect on this disease exerted by comorbidities.