Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(4): 1075-1082, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37863275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe idiopathic arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem to treat. Low-dose irradiation may decrease fibro-osseous proliferation, while rotating-hinge (RH) revision allows for distal femur shortening and collateral ligament sacrifice. This study reports the clinical outcomes and implant survivorship in patients treated with low-dose irradiation and RH revision for severe idiopathic arthrofibrosis following TKA. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 60 consecutive patients. Patients who had greater than 80° arc of knee motion or less than 15° flexion contracture were excluded. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 14). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed, and logistic regressions were used to determine associations between preoperative patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Median flexion contracture and median terminal flexion at presentation were 20 and 70°, respectively; at final follow-up, 59 of 60 patients (98%) had ≤10° flexion contracture and 49 of 60 patients (82%) had ≥90° of flexion. The 10-year survivorship free from reoperation for any reason, revision for any reason, and revision for aseptic loosening were 63, 87, and 97%, respectively. There were 27% percent of patients who underwent a manipulation under anesthesia postoperatively, which was the most common reason for return to the operating room. A greater number of prior surgeries was significantly associated with worse range of motion at the final follow-up (P = .004). There were no known radiation-associated complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe idiopathic arthrofibrosis following TKA treated with low-dose irradiation and RH revision maintained a gain in knee range of motion of 60° with reliable flexion contracture correction at a mean 6-year follow-up. A manipulation under anesthesia was common in the postoperative period. Survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening was excellent at 10 years.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Contratura , Artropatias , Prótese do Joelho , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Prótese do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Artropatias/etiologia , Artropatias/cirurgia , Reoperação , Contratura/etiologia , Contratura/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
2.
Br J Gen Pract ; 61(588): e427-35, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21722451

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Some UK GPs are acquiring access to natriuretic peptide (NP) testing or echocardiography as diagnostic tests for heart failure. This study developed appropriateness ratings for the diagnostic application of these tests in routine general practice. AIM: To develop appropriateness ratings for the diagnostic application of NP testing or echocardiography for heart failure in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: An appropriateness ratings evaluation in UK general practice. METHOD: Four presenting symptoms (cough, bilateral ankle swelling, dyspnoea, fatigue), three levels of risk of cardiovascular disease (low, intermediate, high), and dichotomous categorisations of cardiovascular/chest examination and electrocardiogram result, were used to create 540 appropriateness scenarios for patients in whom NP testing or echocardiography might be considered. These were rated by a 10-person expert panel, consisting of GPs and GPs with specialist interests in cardiology, in a two-round RAND Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: Onward referral for NP testing or echocardiography was rated as an appropriate next step in 217 (40.2%) of the 540 scenarios; in 194 (35.9%) it was rated inappropriate. The ratings also show where NP testing or echocardiography were ranked as equivalent next steps and when one test was seen as the more appropriate than the other. CONCLUSION: NP testing should be the routine test for suspected heart failure where referral for diagnostic testing is considered appropriate. An abnormal electrocardiogram status makes referral to echocardiography an accompanying, or more appropriate, next step alongside NP testing, especially in the presence of dyspnoea. Abnormal NP testing should subsequently be followed up with referral for echocardiography.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/metabolismo , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/metabolismo , Triagem/métodos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Consenso , Tosse/etiologia , Erros de Diagnóstico , Dispneia/etiologia , Ecocardiografia , Edema Cardíaco/etiologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Fadiga/etiologia , Humanos , Prática Profissional , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...