The Use of Whole Blood in Rural Trauma Leads to Decreased Resource Utilization.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 40% of trauma deaths result from uncontrolled hemorrhage. Most of these deaths occur within 24 hours, highlighting the importance of early resuscitation. Balanced component resuscitation has been shown to improve outcomes in hemorrhagic shock. However, hemostatic properties may then be decreased, leading to inadequate coagulopathy treatment or higher transfusion requirements. Data comparing the efficacy of component vs. whole blood (WB) resuscitation in early trauma is poor, particularly in the rural population. This study investigates WB use and resource utilization at a rural Level 1 trauma center. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with historical controls (HC) was performed using patients over age 17 presenting as the highest priority trauma. Two units of WB were available to patients with signs of hemorrhagic shock, with subsequent transfusions via massive transfusion protocol or thromboelastography guidance. Component utilization, time to hemorrhage control, complications, and transfer times were examined. RESULTS: Forty patients received WB vs. 153 HC. WB patients had lower complication rates (35% vs. 55.6%; P = .02), and a significant reduction in pRBC utilization in the emergency department (0 vs. 2; P < .0001) and throughout admission (2.0 vs. 4.0; P = .0003). All patients had prolonged transport times given the rural setting (1.42 hours HC vs. 2.03 hours WB; P = .002). DISCUSSION: Unlike most urban WB studies, this study occurred in a rural area with extended transportation times, when WB is inaccessible for patients. Despite this delay, WB patients demonstrated lower component utilization and complication rates. Further research is needed to characterize the impact of early WB access.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Hepatitis C Testing: The Need to Adopt Universal Screening in an Appalachian Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends screening baby boomers and high-risk patients for hepatitis C virus (HCV); however, the incidence of HCV is rapidly increasing among younger populations, and screening is limited by access to care and risk factor assessment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate characteristics of HCV antibody-positive (Ab+) and ribonucleic acid (RNA)-confirmed-positive patients identified via two screening models in an Appalachian emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who screened HCV Ab+ in the ED from January 1 to October 31, 2018. Data were extracted, and comparative analyses were conducted between the risk-based and the universal screening models. RESULTS: Overall, 444 patients screened HCV Ab+, with a median age of 39 years. From January to May 2018, the risk factor model identified 126 HCV Ab+ patients out of 3,014 screened (4%), whereas from June to October 2018, the universal model identified 318 HCV Ab+ patients out of 5,407 screened (6%; p < 0.001). A consistently large proportion of diagnoses were new (71%). There was no statistically significant decrease between the RNA-confirmed-positive patients during the risk factor model (76, 60%) and universal model (186, 58%) time periods (p = 0.72). The models had high rates of reported intravenous drug use, and the universal screening adoption was modest at 33%. CONCLUSION: This study was the first to present characteristics of HCV Ab+ and RNA-confirmed-positive patients identified during the transition to a universal screening model in an Appalachian ED. Most diagnoses were new regardless of screening model, but more patients screened HCV Ab+, and a similar proportion were RNA-confirmed-positive, under the universal model. Given that adoption of universal screening was modest, and risk factors remained similar, future research should investigate how to more effectively implement a universal screening model on a wider scale to identify early infections.

Septic hip arthritis: diagnosis and arthrocentesis using bedside ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Septic arthritis of the hip is an infrequent disorder that is difficult to diagnose. Traditional methods of obtaining synovial fluid from the hip are not always available in most emergency departments. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of atypical septic arthritis with the diagnosis and management significantly aided by the use of bedside ultrasound. CASE REPORT: An 18-year-old pregnant woman presented with right hip pain, a normal temperature, and elevated inflammatory markers. She had no risk factors for septic arthritis. The differential diagnosis was broad, but the use of bedside ultrasound assisted in rapidly narrowing the differential, as well as guiding the diagnostic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside ultrasound is a useful tool to evaluate inflammatory disorders of the hip and assists in hip arthrocentesis, a procedure that has not been traditionally performed by most emergency physicians.