The Effect of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on Quality of Life and Clinical Events after an Ischemic Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: Repeated remote ischemic postconditioning (rIPostC) may be an easily applicable treatment following ischemic stroke to improve quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. rIPostC consists of repeated, brief periods of limb ischemia (through inflation of a blood pressure cuff), followed by reperfusion. This study investigated the 1-year follow-up of rIPostC on QoL and clinical events. METHODS: As part of a randomized controlled trial, adult patients with an ischemic stroke within 24 hours after onset of symptoms were randomized to repeated rIPostC or sham-conditioning. rIPostC was applied twice daily during hospitalization (maximum of 4 days). QoL and patientreported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at 12-week and 1-year follow-ups. Additionally, we explored the effect of repeated rIPostC on clinical events (recurrent cerebrovascular events, hospitalization, and mortality). RESULTS: The trial was preliminarily stopped due to limitations in recruitment after the inclusion of 88 patients (rIPostC: 40; sham-conditioning: 48) (70 years, 68% male). Questionnaires were returned by 69 (78%) and 63 (72%) participants after 12 weeks and 1 year, respectively. The median difference of the stroke-specific QoL between rIPostC and sham-conditioning was 0.05 (p =0.986) and -0.16 (p =0.654) after 12 weeks and 1-year, respectively. No significant effect of rIPostC on the different domains of PROMs was detected. We observed no between-group differences in recurrent cerebrovascular events, hospitalization, or all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratios p >0.05). CONCLUSION: In this exploratory analysis, we observed no significant difference between repeated rIPostC and usual care on QoL and clinical outcomes at 12 weeks and 1 year in patients with an ischemic stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6880.

Attenuated inflammatory profile following single and repeated handgrip exercise and remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with cerebral small vessel disease.

Background: Similar to remote ischemic preconditioning bouts of exercise may possess immediate protective effects against ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. This study compared the impact of single and repeated handgrip exercise versus remote ischemic preconditioning on inflammatory biomarkers in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). Methods: In this crossover study, 14 patients with cSVD were included. All participants performed 4-day of handgrip exercise (4x5-minutes at 30% of maximal handgrip strength) and remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC; 4x5-minutes cuff occlusion around the upper arm) twice daily. Patients were randomized to start with either handgrip exercise or rIPC and the two interventions were separated by > 9 days. Venous blood was drawn before and after one intervention, and after 4-day of repeated exposure. We performed a targeted proteomics on inflammation markers in all blood samples. Results: Targeted proteomics revealed significant changes in 9 out of 92 inflammatory proteins, with four proteins demonstrating comparable time-dependent effects between handgrip and rIPC. After adjustment for multiple testing we found significant decreases in FMS-related tyrosine kinase-3 ligand (Flt3L; 16.2% reduction; adjusted p-value: 0.029) and fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21; 32.8% reduction adjusted p-value: 0.029) after single exposure. This effect did not differ between handgrip and rIPC. The decline in Flt3L after repeated handgrip and rIPC remained significant (adjusted p-value = 0.029), with no difference between rIPC and handgrip (adjusted p-value = 0.98). Conclusion: Single handgrip exercise and rIPC immediately attenuated plasma Flt3L and FGF-21, with the reduction of Flt3L remaining present after 4-day of repeated intervention, in people with cSVD. This suggests that single and repeated handgrip exercise and rIPC decrease comparable inflammatory biomarkers, which suggests activation of shared (anti-)inflammatory pathways following both stimuli. Additional studies will be needed to exclude the possibility that this activation is merely a time effect.

Interval exercise, but not endurance exercise, prevents endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in healthy subjects.

Endothelial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury importantly contributes to the poor prognosis during ischemic (myocardial) events. Preconditioning, i.e., repeated exposure to short periods of ischemia, effectively reduces endothelial I/R injury. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that exercise has preconditioning effects on endothelial I/R injury. Therefore, we studied whether an acute bout of endurance or interval exercise is able to protect against endothelial I/R injury. In 17 healthy young subjects, we examined changes in brachial artery endothelial function using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) before and after a bout of high-intensity interval exercise, moderate-intensity endurance exercise, or a control intervention. Subsequently, I/R injury was induced by inflation of a blood pressure cuff around the upper arm to 220 mmHg for 20 min and 20 min of reperfusion followed by another FMD measurement. Near-infrared spectrometry was used to examine local tissue oxygenation during exercise. No differences in brachial artery FMD were found at baseline for the three conditions. I/R induced a significant decline in FMD (7.1±2.3 to 4.3±2.3, P<0.001). When preceded by the interval exercise bout, no change in FMD was present after I/R (7.7±3.1 to 7.2±3.1, P=0.56), whereas the decrease in FMD after I/R could not be prevented by the endurance exercise bout (7.8±3.1 to 3.8±1.7, P<0.001). In conclusion, a single bout of lower limb interval exercise, but not moderate-intensity endurance exercise, effectively prevents brachial artery endothelial I/R injury. This indicates the presence of a remote preconditioning effect of exercise, which is selectively present after short-term interval but not continuous exercise in healthy young subjects.