Pharmacokinetics and safety of single intravenous and oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in healthy women.

Twenty-four healthy women received 2.4 mg kg-1 dolasetron mesylate (1.8 mg kg-1 dolasetron base) by a 10 min intravenous administration and by oral administration. Pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and of its active reduced metabolite MDL 74156 were monitored for 48 h in plasma. Urine was collected from 0 to 48 h, blood pressure and heart rate were measured at 0, 0.08, 1, 2, 12, 24, and 36 h, and ECGs were measured at 0, 0.08 (intravenous only), 1, 2, and 36 h after dosing. Dolasetron was widely distributed and rapidly reduced (mean t1/2 = 0.23 h) to MDL 74156 (mean t1/2 = 8.05 and 9.12 h after intravenous and oral administration respectively). MDL 74156 was extensively distributed; between 27 (oral route) and 33% (intravenous route) was eliminated unchanged in urine. Safety assessment showed mild to moderate headache, dizziness, and hot flushes after the intravenous administration and headache, abdominal cramps or pain, and constipation after oral administration. Small and clinically non-significant changes in PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were observed. We conclude that there is no obvious difference in dolasetron pharmacokinetics between healthy women and men and that dolasetron can be used as safely in women as in men.

Pharmacokinetics of single intravenous and oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in healthy elderly volunteers.

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147EF, Anzemet; Hoechst Marion Roussel, Laval, Canada) is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist undergoing clinical evaluation for use as an antiemetic agent. The pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and its reduced metabolite (MDL 74,156) were studied after administration of single intravenous and oral doses of dolasetron mesylate 2.4 mg/kg in 18 healthy elderly subjects. Expressed as the dolasetron base, this dose was 1.8 mg/kg. Dolasetron was rapidly metabolized to the reduced metabolite, which appeared in plasma within 10 minutes after intravenous or oral administration. The mean half-life (t1/2) of dolasetron was 0.24 hours after intravenous administration and 0.50 hours after oral administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the reduced metabolite were similar after intravenous and oral administration. The apparent absolute bioavailability of the reduced metabolite was 89%, and it had an elimination t1/2 of approximately 7 hours and an apparent volume of distribution (Vd beta) of 4.69 L/kg. Dolasetron was not detected in urine. Metabolites were excreted in urine almost completely within 24 hours of administration. The primary metabolite detected in urine was the (+)-enantiomer of the reduced metabolite, which accounted for 25.35% (+/- 7.79%) and 18.88% (+/- 7.65%) of the intravenous and oral doses, respectively. Hydroxylated metabolites accounted for 5% or less of the total dose via either route. The pharmacokinetics of the reduced metabolite after single intravenous or oral doses in elderly volunteers were consistent with pharmacokinetics observed in both young healthy men and cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. Dosage adjustments of dolasetron mesylate on the basis of age do not appear to be necessary.

The influence of time of administration on the pharmacokinetics of a once-a-day diltiazem formulation: morning against bedtime.

Twenty-three young, healthy, male volunteers received, in a randomized crossover design, 240 mg of a once-a-day diltiazem formulation at 08:00 (AM) or 22:00 (HS) for 6 days. A 7 day washout period was observed between the two modes of administration. Diltiazem plasma concentrations were monitored every hour for 24 h and at 30, 36, and 48 h after the last dose. Differences were found between AM and HS dosing for Cmin (mean (SD) = 47 center dot 2 (25 center dot 8) against 39 center dot 6 (21 center dot 1) ng mL-1, p = 0 center dot 038), AUC0-24 (2008 (814) against 1754 (714) ng h mL-1, p = 0 center dot 024), and AUC0-48 (2662 (1244) against 2395 (238) ng h mL-1, p = 0 center dot 034). Overall the two modes of administration did not produce bioequivalent pharmacokinetic profiles. Also HS dosing gave significantly higher plasma concentrations of diltiazem in the early morning hours when the incidence of cardiovascular events is higher. If one assumes a strong correlation between plasma concentrations and myocardial protection then HS dosing should be recommended for QD formulation of diltiazem. Clinical studies should be performed to confirm this theoretical pharmacokinetic advantage.

Release of 5-ASA from Pentasa in patients with Crohn's disease of the small intestine.

BACKGROUND: Pentasa is a controlled-release tablet made from semipermeable microspheres and designed to continuously deliver therapeutic quantities of 5-ASA (5-aminosalicylic acid) throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Scintigraphic studies in healthy subjects have documented that 5-ASA release could occur in the small intestine. We tested here the disintegration of Pentasa in the digestive tract of nine patients with Crohn's disease of the small intestine. MATERIALS: Each patient was given, after breakfast, a 250 mg tablet of Pentasa containing samarium-153 oxide. For 8 h the progression of the isotope in the gastrointestinal tract was followed using gamma camera scintigraphy. Plasma measurement of 5-ASA and acetylated 5-ASA was used to verify the liberation and absorption of 5-ASA. RESULTS: The Pentasa tablet appeared completely dissolved in the stomach by 117 +/- 18 min. Samarium oxide was first detected in the small intestine 60 +/- 5 min after its ingestion; it reached the colon after 280 +/- 13 min and it was completely absent from the small intestine at 360 +/- 26 min. Plasma concentrations of 5-ASA started to rise after 67 +/- 7 min and were maximal at 222 +/- 25 min. CONCLUSION: In patients with Crohn's disease of the small intestine, Pentasa microgranules start releasing 5-ASA in the proximal small intestine, acting locally to exert its beneficial effect.

The effect of multiple doses of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of diltiazem in dogs.

In order to determine the potential pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ranitidine and diltiazem (DTZ), each of ten male beagle dogs, age 2.7-4.0 years, weight 13-16 kg, received a single oral dose of sustained release DTZ with and without previous multiple oral doses of ranitidine (150 mg bid for five doses). The dog was selected as the animal model because the pharmacokinetics and metabolism profiles of DTZ are similar to those in humans and because sustained release DTZ capsules can be administered with ease to this species. Following the oral dose of DTZ, blood samples (5 ml each) were obtained via a cephalic vein at 0 (just before dosing), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, and 48 h after the dose. Urine samples were collected for 48 h post dose. Plasma and urine concentrations of DTZ and its major metabolites N-monodesmethyl DTZ (MA), deacetyl DTZ (M1), and deacetyl N-monodesmethyl DTZ (M2) were determined by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-linear curve fitting, and the effect of ranitidine was evaluated by two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pre-treatment of the animals did not significantly alter the disposition of DTZ (p > 0.05). Similar to the results reported in clinical studies, there were large variations in the plasma and urine concentrations of DTZ and its major metabolites among the beagle dogs. The effect of ranitidine on the disposition of DTZ was highly variable.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a slow-release formulation of diltiazem after the administration of a single and repeated doses to healthy volunteers.

Diltiazem is a calcium antagonist used in angina pectoris and hypertension. There is little information concerning the slow-release (SR) formulation in the literature. The pharmacokinetics of diltiazem SR (120 mg) have been assessed over a 36h period in healthy volunteers after single- (SD) and multiple-dose (MD) administrations. Cmax, AUC0-36, and AUC0-infinity were significantly increased at steady state compared to the extrapolated SD values, suggesting accumulation of the drug. Renal and cardiovascular parameters have also been assessed at intervals of 3-6h during baseline (B) and following single and multiple doses of diltiazem SR. Diuresis over a 24 h period was increased, but not significantly, by the administration of diltiazem SR i.e. 1782 ml (MD) and 1915 ml (SD), versus 1626 ml (B). Natriuresis and creatinine clearance were slightly decreased by diltiazem SR, compared to B values; this might be due to the relatively short period over which steady state was maintained (five days) and the effects of norepinephrine and angiotensine II on renal vasculature and the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem SR. No increase in the systolic blood pressure occurred after the administration of diltiazem SR; diastolic blood pressure and PR interval were decreased and increased respectively by diltiazem SR. These results do not appear to be clinically significant. Finally, no relation was found between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diltiazem. This may be attributed to the absence of clinically significant effects in healthy volunteers, the presence of active metabolites, the pharmacokinetics of the SR formulation and/or the accumulation of the drug at steady state.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two marketed bid formulations of diltiazem in healthy volunteers.

Cardizem SR and Bi-Tildiem were both approved in their respective countries on the basis of clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety in the treatment of angina pectoris. In this cross-over randomized study, we assessed whether these two sustained-release formulations of diltiazem have equivalent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Twenty-four young healthy male volunteers were hooked to Holters and ambulatory blood pressure monitors for 24 h to establish baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), sinus rate and PR intervals. They then received a single dose of 120 mg of diltiazem from one formulation. The pharmacodynamic measurements were recorded for a further 24 h and blood samples were collected over 36 h for evaluation of diltiazem in plasma by a high-performance liquid chromatogrpahic (HPLC) method. The procedures were repeated with the alternate formulation after a 7 d wash-out. Pharmacokinetics showed statistically significant (p < 0.01) differences in AUC0-12 with means (+/- SD) of 519.2(+/- 172.8) and 429.6(+/- 147.2) ng h ml-1, AUC0-36 of 835.6(+/- 281.6) and 730.9 (+/- 271.5) ng h ml-1 and Cmax of 89.1(+/- 30.3) and 61.1(+/- 21.2) ng ml-1 for Cardizem SR and Bi-Tildiem, respectively. The only pharmacodynamic parameter showing a statistically significant difference in change from baseline between the two formulations was DBP with mean (+/- SD) change in AUC0-12 of -13.6(+/- 20.8) and +8.4(+/- 31.7) mm Hg h (p = 0.0135) and in AUC0-24 of -33.0(+/- 43.7) and -0.3(+/- 59.2) mm Hg h (p = 0.0463) for Cardizem SR and Bi-Tildiem, respectively. These findings suggest that assessment of efficacy of sustained-release formulations of diltiazem by bioequivalence could be misleading. They also confirm that a single dose of diltiazem does not elicit a significant pharmacodynamic response in healthy volunteers. Equivalence for such formulations should therefore be demonstrated by pharmacodynamic evaluation or clinical studies in a patient population.

Bioavailability of metformin in tablet form using a new high pressure liquid chromatography assay method.

Twenty-four young healthy volunteers received a single dose of metformin 500 mg (Glucophage, Nordic Laboratories, Canada) in tablet form. Plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC in samples collected prior to and 0.33, 0.66, 1, 1.33, 1.66, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 30 h after dosing. Mean (+/- SD) Cmax was 682.1 (160.6) ng ml-1 at a mean (+/- SD) tmax of 2.4 (0.93) h. Overall elimination was monoexponential with a mean (+/- SD) half-life of 3.16 (0.47) h. We conclude that metformin is rapidly absorbed from this formulation and is also rapidly eliminated. Extrapolation to steady state predicts that equilibrium will be reached within 24 h.

Effect of cimetidine on hepatic biochemical changes, liver toxicity and major urinary metabolite excretion of trichloroethylene in rats.

The effects of cimetidine (CIM) (an inhibitor of the hepatic microsomal monooxygenase system) on the metabolism and hepatotoxicity of trichloroethylene (TRI) were studied in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were given three doses of 120 mg/kg i.p. (low-dose regimen) of CIM at 0, 6 and 11 h for 1 day, or ten doses of 200 mg/kg (high-dose regimen) at 8, 11, 14 and 17 h for 2 days and 8 and 11 h on 3rd day. Trichloroethylene (0.5 or 0.65 ml/kg) was administered i.p. 1 h after 2nd dose (low-dose regimen) or 9th dose (high-dose regimen) of CIM. In the low-dose regimen study, the activity of hepatic microsomal aminopyrine N-demethylase was decreased 1 and 5 h after the second dose and 7 h after the third dose of CIM, but became normal 20 h after the last dose. The cytochrome P-450 content and the activities of aniline hydroxylase and epoxide hydratase remained unchanged. Trichloroethylene at both dose levels produced liver toxicity, as verified by increase in activities of SDH and SGPT as well as by liver histology. Cimetidine alone had no such effect. An apparent reduction in TRI toxicity by CIM (at both dose regimens) could be observed histologically. The biochemical tests (SDH and SGPT) corroborated the histological changes only when TRI was given at a dose of 0.5 ml/kg combined with a high-dose regimen of CIM. Cimetidine at both dose regimens had a tendency to decrease the in vivo metabolism of TRI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)