Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 137(4): 297-300, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20417365

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous complications following implantation of an electric system have been reported mainly after the implantation of pacemakers, cardiac defibrillators and morphine pumps. However, cutaneous complications following implantation of spinal cord stimulators are rarely described in the literature. Here we report two cases of cutaneous eruption at the spinal cord stimulation site, one involving foreign-body reaction to silicone in the neurostimulator electrodes or connector block and the other comprising contact dermatitis to silicone. CASE REPORTS: Case 1: A 43-year-old woman had been implanted with a spinal cord stimulator. Four months after implantation, burning sensation and cutaneous inflammatory erythema were observed in the dorsolumbar region, with reduced efficiency of stimulation. Removal of the neurostimulator led to resolution of the cutaneous symptoms. Histopathological examination of the biopsy sample showed foreign-body granuloma formation. The same symptoms subsequently recurred on the surgical scar and histopathology showed granuloma formation in response to particles of silicone present in the connector. The cutaneous eruption subsided rapidly after excision. Case 2: In a 60-year-old man implanted with a spinal cord stimulator, pruriginous reticular erythema was rapidly observed on the skin just above the neurostimulator, with papules around the erythema. Histopathology of two cutaneous biopsies showed evidence of contact dermatitis. Skin-patch tests performed with components of the neurostimulator leads proved positive to two types of silicone after 72 hours. The eruption was successfully controlled using topical corticosteroid therapy. DISCUSSION: Reports of cutaneous eruptions after spinal cord stimulation are extremely rare. Here we report two different cutaneous reactions with two different pathophysiological mechanisms, both involving silicone. The first case is original because it is the first documented case of a foreign-body reaction involving granuloma formation in response to particles of silicone present in the components of a neurostimulator. The second case concerns contact dermatitis to silicone (present in the connector block and electrode sheaths).


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Eritema/etiologia , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Elastômeros de Silicone/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Cicatriz/etiologia , Feminino , Granuloma de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Laminectomia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Ciática/terapia , Medula Espinal
2.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 16(3): 244-9, 1997.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9732773

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of anaesthetiologists (Anaes) with general practitioners (GP) and paediatricians (Paed), possessors of the medical files of children scheduled to undergo ambulatory anaesthesia and participating in postoperative surveillance. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional prospective survey. PERSONS: GP and Paed treating children admitted in September 1994 at the paediatric clinic of the University hospital of Tours for ambulatory surgery. METHOD: Questionnaire including 11 items circulated to 2,181 GP and 100 Paed of the centre of France. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Replies were obtained from 1,053 GP (48%) and 64 Paed (64%). The experience of Anaesth in paediatric anaesthesia was the least important criterion for the choice of the clinic (for 67% of Paed and 44% of GP). The rate of contacts of Anaesth with GP and Paed was low (23% of GP and 38% of Paed). Informations concerning anaesthesia (26% of GP and 42% of Paed), or its complications (8% of GP and 8% of Paed) were scarce. The rules of ambulatory anaesthesia were better known by Paed (56%) than by GP (34%), unlike those for autotransfusion (45% of GP and 23% of Paed). A majority of GP (82%) and Paed (73%) would appreciate an anaesthetic report. Most of GP (86%) and Paed (83%) were in favour of more informations, mainly through continuing medical education, on these problems.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Relações Interprofissionais , Pediatria , Assistência Ambulatorial , Estudos Transversais , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Relações Hospital-Médico , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...