Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
J Affect Disord ; 249: 378-384, 2019 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30818246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for major depressive disorder (MDD) are a significant burden on patients, their families, and to healthcare systems. This study characterized the prevalence of MDD hospitalizations in the US and described clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, length of stay, costs, and MDD-related hospitalization readmissions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Premier Perspective® Hospital Database was conducted using records of hospital admissions for MDD from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. To supplement this analysis, healthcare claims data from Truven MarketScan® Research Database were also evaluated between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014. RESULTS: Among adult hospital stays in the Premier network, 1.3% included a primary diagnosis of MDD. The mean length of MDD-related stays was 6 days, with a mean total hospital charge per stay of $6713. Of those with hospital stays, 5.2% of patients had at least 1 readmission for MDD within 30 days of discharge. In the MarketScan database, 4% of adults with MDD had a MDD-related hospital stay, with a mean length of stay of 6 days and total reimbursed amount per stay of $8441. Of those with hospital stays, 5.4% had at least 1 readmission for MDD within 30 days. LIMITATIONS: Results may not be generalizable to hospitals outside of those represented by these databases. CONCLUSIONS: Adult MDD hospitalizations are costly and associated with high rates of readmission. There is a need for new treatments that may help reduce hospitalizations and costs related to hospitalizations in patients with MDD.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/economia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Bases de Dados Factuais , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Opioid Manag ; 14(2): 131-141, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29733099

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Identify opioid abuse risk factors among chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) patients receiving long-term opioid therapy and assess healthcare resource use (HRU) among patients at elevated abuse risk. DESIGN: Data were obtained from an integrated administrative claims database. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis identified risk factors potentially predictive of opioid abuse, which were used to classify the overall population into cohorts defined by levels of abuse risk. Multivariable logistic regression compared HRU across risk cohorts. SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: 21,072 patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with ≥1 of 5 types of CNCP and a prescription for Schedule II or III/IV opioid medication used long-term (≥90 days). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Opioid abuse risk factors; (2) HRU differences between risk cohorts. RESULTS: CART analysis identified four groups at elevated opioid abuse risk defined by three factors (age, daily opioid dose, and total days' supply of opioids); sensitivity: 70.3 percent, specificity: 74.1 percent, and positive predictive value: 5.6 percent. The analysis results were used to classify patients into low-risk (72.5 percent), at-risk (25.4 percent), and opioid-abuser (2.2 percent) cohorts. In multivariable analysis, emergency department (ED) use was higher among at-risk vs low-risk patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.14; p<0.05); hospitalization and ED visits were higher for opioid-abusers vs low-risk patients (OR: 2.33 and 2.14, respectively; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a subpopulation of CNCP patients at risk of opioid abuse. However, limited sensitivity and specificity of criteria defining this subpopulation reinforce the importance of physician discretion in patient-level treatment decisions.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/provisão & distribuição , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Pain Res ; 10: 1713-1722, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28769587

RESUMO

The study assessed 12-month chronic pain (CP)-related health care utilization and costs among chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) patients who initiated various long-term opioid treatments. Treatments included monotherapy with long-acting opioids (mono-LAOs), mono-therapy with short-acting opioids (mono-SAOs), both LAOs and SAOs (combination), and opioid therapy initiated with SAO or LAO and switched to the other class (switch). Using MarketScan® claims databases (2006-2012), we identified CNCP patients with ≥90 days opioid supply after pain diagnosis and continuous enrollment 12 months before pain diagnosis (baseline period) and 12 months after opioid start (post-index period). Outcomes included CP-related health care utilization and costs. Among CNCP patients (n=21,203), the cohort distribution was 74% mono-SAOs, 22% combination, 2% mono-LAOs, and 2% switch. During follow-up, the average daily morphine equivalent dose was highest in mono-LAO patients (96.4 mg) compared with combination patients (89.8 mg), switch patients (64.3 mg), and mono-SAO patients (36.2 mg). After adjusting for baseline differences, the mono-LAO cohort had lower total CP-related costs ($4,933) compared with the mono-SAO ($8,604), switch ($10,470), and combination ($15,190) cohorts (all: P<0.05). Mono-LAO patients had greater CP-related prescription costs but lower medical costs than the other cohorts during the follow-up period, including lower CP-related hospitalizations (1% vs 11%-20%), emergency department visits (4% vs 11%-18%), and diagnostic radiology use (21% vs 54%-61%) (all: P<0.001). Use of pain-related medications and other treatment modalities was also significantly lower in the mono-LAO cohort relative to the other cohorts. CNCP patients using long-term monotherapy with LAOs had the lowest CP-related total health care costs in the 12 months after opioid initiation compared with mono-SAO, switch, or combination patients despite higher opioid daily doses and higher prescription costs. Future research accounting for severity and duration of pain would aid in determining the optimal long-term opioid regimen for CNCP patients.

4.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 17(10): 676-683, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28729178

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend that comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), be considered when selecting tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). We report here the prevalence of CVD and its risk factors in patients with CML treated by community-based United States (US) oncologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CML and ≥ 1 encounter after the first date of CML diagnosis in an electronic medical record database between January 1, 2005 and October 31, 2014 were enrolled. CVD conditions/risk factors were assessed at baseline and during the 5-year follow-up period using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnoses codes and information from physician progress notes. One-year prevalence estimates were age- and gender-standardized for comparison to annual rates in the US population. RESULTS: A total of 1639 patients were included. At 5-year follow-up, the prevalence of CVD conditions and CVD risk factors was 33.0% and 77.7%, respectively. Compared with the general US adult population, the standardized prevalence rates at 1 year in patients with CML were significantly higher by factors of 1.3 to 3.5 times for CVD conditions, and 20% to 40% significantly higher for hypertension, diabetes, and obesity (P < .001). The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was not significantly higher in patients residing in the US Stroke Belt. CONCLUSION: The increased risk of CVD observed in this real-world analysis of patients with CML underscores the importance of current National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations to consider cardiovascular risk when selecting tyrosine kinase inhibitors.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/complicações , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Comorbidade , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Vigilância da População , Prevalência , Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 23(7): 718-724, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650247

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Substance abuse disorders among chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) patients add to the clinical challenges and economic burden of caring for such patients. Despite potential risks, some CNCP patients with a history of alcohol abuse or dependence (AAD) and pain that is refractory to nonopioid treatment options may still need opioids for pain management. However, there is a lack of data on adverse outcomes in long-term opioid users with CNCP and a history of substance abuse or AAD disorders. OBJECTIVE: To compare adverse outcomes and all-cause health care costs among CNCP patients on long-term opioid treatment with and without a previous diagnosis of AAD. METHODS: Using MarketScan claims databases (2006-2012), CNCP patients with ≥ 90 days of opioid supply after CNCP diagnosis and continuous enrollment 12 months before CNCP diagnosis (baseline period) and 12 months after opioid start (post-index period) were identified. AAD was defined by diagnosis codes at any time before opioid initiation. Outcomes included opioid overdose, accident, and injury episodes identified by ICD-9-CM diagnoses codes. T-tests and Mann-Whitney tests compared continuous measures, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests compared categorical measures between those with and without AAD. Multivariable analyses for outcomes were conducted, adjusting for baseline differences between cohorts. RESULTS: Of 21,203 CNCP patients with long-term opioid treatment, 750 (3.5%) had an AAD diagnosis before opioid initiation. AAD patients were significantly younger (48.4 [SD ± 11.4] years vs. 52.8 [SD ± 14.8] years), less likely to be enrolled in Medicare (17% commercial vs. 4% Medicare), and more likely to be male (67% vs. 48%; all P < 0.001). There were no differences in type or number of CNCP diagnoses or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. Patients with AAD had significantly higher rates of depression and anxiety diagnoses, antidepressant and benzodiazepine use, and drug abuse/dependence diagnoses in the baseline period. Twelvemonth post-index rates of opioid overdose (1.2% vs. 0.2%), accident (7.3% vs. 2.8%), and injury (46.1% vs. 36.8%) were greater in the AAD cohort (all P < 0.001). The differences were nonsignificant for accidents in multivariable analyses. While mean prescription costs were similar ($3,562 vs. $3,312; P = 0.212), AAD patients had significantly higher mean all-cause medical costs ($28,429 vs. $22,082; P < 0.001) and significantly higher all-cause total health care costs ($31,991 vs. $25,395; P < 0.001). The cost differences remained significant in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In the first year after long-term opioid initiation, CNCP patients with a previous AAD diagnosis had 5 times the rate of opioid overdose, 2.3 times the rate of accidents, 1.2 times the rate of injury, and higher all-cause health care costs compared with those not diagnosed with AAD. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this research study and resultant publication was provided by Teva Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, which fully reviewed the manuscript. Gajria and Yeung are employees of Teva Pharmaceuticals. White was an employee of Teva Pharmaceuticals at the time this research was conducted. Blumberg and Coutinho are employees of Xcenda, which received research funding from Teva Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this study and for the preparation of this manuscript. Katz has received research funding and consulting fees from Teva Pharmaceuticals unrelated to this study. Study concept and design were contributed by Katz, White, and Blumberg, along with Coutinho and Yeung. Coutinho took the lead in data collection, assisted by the other authors. Data interpretation was performed by Blumberg, Katz, and Gajria, along with the other authors. The manuscript was written by Gajria, Yeung, Coutinho, and Blumberg, along with Katz and White, and revised by Gajria, Blumberg, Katz, and Coutinho, along with Yeung and White.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Adulto , Alcoolismo/economia , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Dor Crônica/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 9: 85-97, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28203098

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS), a progressive neurodegenerative disease, greatly impacts the quality of life and economic status of people affected by this disease. In Germany, the total annual cost of MS is estimated at €40,000 per person with MS. Natalizumab has shown to slow MS disease progression, reduce relapses, and improve the quality of life of people with MS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MS-related and all-cause health care resource utilization and costs among German MS patients during the 12 months before and after initiation of natalizumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: The current analysis was conducted using the Health Risk Institute research database. Identified patients were aged ≥18 years with ≥1 diagnosis of MS and had initiated natalizumab therapy (index), with 12-month pre- and post-index-period data. Patients were stratified by prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT) usage or no DMT usage in the pre-index period. Outcome measures included corticosteroid use and number of sick/disability days, inpatient stays, and outpatient visits. Health care costs were calculated separately for pre- and post-index periods on a per-patient basis and adjusted for inflation. RESULTS: In a final sample of 193 natalizumab-treated patients, per-patient MS-related corticosteroid use was reduced by 62.3%, MS-related sick days by 27.6%, and inpatient costs by 78.3% from the pre- to post-index period. Furthermore, the proportion of patients with MS-related hospitalizations decreased from 49.7% to 14.0% (P<0.001); this reduction was seen for patients with and without prior DMT use. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting in Germany, initiation of natalizumab treatment in people with MS significantly reduced MS-related hospitalizations, corticosteroid use, sick days, and associated costs.

7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27354781

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to extend previous findings and determine the value of prompt initiation of maintenance treatment (MT) following COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization or an emergency department (ED) visit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Administrative claims data (collected between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2012) from an employer-sponsored commercially insured population were retrospectively used to identify patients with a COPD exacerbation resulting in hospitalization or an ED visit. Patients initiating approved MT for COPD within 30 days of discharge/diagnosis (prompt) were compared with those initiating MT within 31-180 days (delayed). COPD-related total, medical, and prescription drug costs during a 1-year follow-up period were evaluated using semilog ordinary least square regressions, controlling for baseline characteristics plus COPD-related costs from the previous year. The odds and number of subsequent COPD-related exacerbations during the follow-up were compared between the prompt and delayed cohorts using logistic regression and zero-inflated negative binomial models, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 6,521 patients with a COPD-related hospitalization or an ED visit were included, of whom 4,555 received prompt MT and 1,966 received delayed MT. Adjusted COPD-related total and medical costs were significantly lower for the prompt MT than the delayed MT cohorts (US$3,931 vs US$4,857 and US$2,327 vs US$3,087, respectively; both P<0.010), as were COPD-related prescription costs (US$1,526 vs US$1,683, P<0.010) during the 1-year follow-up period. Patients receiving delayed MT were 68% more likely to have a subsequent exacerbation requiring hospitalization and 80% more likely to have an exacerbation requiring an ED visit. CONCLUSION: Prompt initiation of MT following a COPD-related hospitalization or an ED visit was associated with a significant reduction in COPD-related costs and odds of exacerbation in the following year compared with delayed initiation.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Seguro Saúde , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo para o Tratamento , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Broncodilatadores/economia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Esquema de Medicação , Custos de Medicamentos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização , Humanos , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Modelos Logísticos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/economia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
8.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 34: 29, 2015 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25888436

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2009, treatment guidelines were updated to recommend KRAS testing at diagnosis for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated KRAS testing rates over time and compared characteristics of KRAS-tested and not-tested patients in a community-based oncology setting. METHODS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of mCRC from 2008-2011 were selected from the ACORN Data Warehouse (ACORN Research LLC, Memphis, TN). Text mining of physician progress notes and full chart reviews identified KRAS-tested patients, test dates, and test results (KRAS status). The overall proportion of eligible patients KRAS-tested in each calendar year was calculated. Among KRAS-tested patients, the proportion tested at diagnosis (within 60 days) was calculated by year. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare patient characteristics at diagnosis between tested and not-tested cohorts, and to identify factors associated with KRAS testing. RESULTS: Among 1,363 mCRC patients seen from 2008-2011, 648 (47.5%) were KRAS-tested. Among newly diagnosed mCRC patients, the rate of KRAS testing increased from 5.9% prior to 2008, to 13.9% in 2008, and then jumped dramatically to 32.3% in 2009, after which a modest yearly increase continued. The proportions of KRAS-tested patients who had been diagnosed in previous years but not tested previously increased from 17.7% in 2008 to 27.0% in 2009, then decreased to 19.0% in 2010 and 17.6% in 2011. Among patients who were KRAS-tested, the proportions tested at the time of diagnosis increased annually (to 78.4% in 2011). Patients more likely to have been tested included those with lung metastases, poor performance status, more comorbidities, and mCRC diagnosis in 2009 or later. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of KRAS testing increased over time, corresponding to changes in treatment guidelines and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor product labels; however, approximately 50% of eligible patients were untested during the study period.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Testes Genéticos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Metástase Neoplásica , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 13(3): 178-84, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25065655

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In 2008, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were revised in light of the identification of the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) gene as a biomarker of nonresponse to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. This study sought to describe and compare real-world treatment patterns of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) according to KRAS genotype in community-based oncology practices in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the ACORN (ACORN LLC, Memphis, TN) electronic medical record data warehouse, containing data of approximately 180,000 patients from 12 oncology practices across the United States were used. Records of adult patients with mCRC who had undergone KRAS testing between January 2008 and December 2011 were evaluated. Patient demographic characteristics, KRAS genotype, and treatment patterns were identified and compared. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-eight mCRC patients who were tested for KRAS were identified. Of these, 48.1% had wild type (WT), 42.3% mutant, and 9.6% unknown genotypes. Most patients (72.1%) were tested in 2009 or later, after the guideline revision. Bevacizumab-containing combinations were the most common first-line regimens in KRAS mutant and WT patients. Approximately 90% of patients received at least 1 line of therapy, however, WT patients received significantly more lines of therapy than KRAS mutant patients (2.6 ± 1.5 vs. 2.1 ± 1.2; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: KRAS WT and mutant genotypes had similar first-line regimens; however, WT patients received more lines of therapy. Although there does not appear to be a lag between changes in guidelines and treatment practice, professional and government organizations must keep up with the changing science and disseminate this information to oncologists in a timely manner.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Genótipo , Padrões de Prática Médica , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/genética , Proteínas ras/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Capecitabina , Cetuximab , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Panitumumabe , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Pediatr ; 164(6): 1444-8.e1, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24661339

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe patient characteristics, concordance with recommended postdischarge care, and risk of repeat events within a cohort of children discharged from an emergency department (ED) or hospital for food-induced anaphylaxis in the US. STUDY DESIGN: Children (aged <18 years) with an ED visit/hospitalization for food-induced anaphylaxis were identified from the 2002-2008 Truven Health MarketScan databases using an expanded International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code algorithm. The initial identified ED visit/hospitalization was the index event. Claims data for the children with continuous medical and prescription coverage for ≥1 year before and after the index event were evaluated. Analyses included the rates of 1-year postdischarge epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) prescription fills, allergist/immunologist visits, and repeat events. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 1009 patients with an average age of 7 years, including 58% males, 27% with a history of asthma, and 90% discharged from an ED. Within 1 year postdischarge, 83% had an EAI prescription fill (69% within 1 week postdischarge), 43% had a specialist visit (51% within 4 weeks postdischarge), and 6.4% had evidence of another anaphylaxis-related ED visit/hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Among children with food-induced anaphylaxis, within 1 year postdischarge from the ED or hospital, concordance was higher for EAI prescription fills than for allergist/immunologist visits. Subsequent ED visits/hospital stays for anaphylactic events were low. More research is needed to identify barriers between recommendations and physician/patient behaviors, as well as the impact of not following the recommendations on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/etiologia , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/normas , Adolescente , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/tratamento farmacológico , Guias como Assunto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 1(6): 595-601.e1, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24565706

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Food-induced anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening condition that frequently results in emergency department (ED) visits and/or hospitalization. Little information is available on patient compliance with recommended postdischarge anaphylaxis care. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient characteristics, concordance with recommended postdischarge care, and risk of repeated events among adults with an initial ED visit and/or hospitalization for food-induced anaphylaxis. METHODS: In this retrospective study of health care claims, adults with an ED visit and/or hospitalization for food-induced anaphylaxis were identified from the 2002-2008 Truven Health MarketScan Databases by using an expanded International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code algorithm. The first identified ED visit and/or hospitalization was the index event. Data from patients with continuous medical and prescription coverage for ≥1 year before and after the index event were retained for analysis. Analyses included baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, postdischarge epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) prescription fills and allergist/immunologist visits, and repeated events in the 1-year postindex period. RESULTS: Patients (n = 1370) had a mean (SD) age of 44 ± 15 years, 58% were women. Most (86%) were seen in the ED and/ discharged from the ED. Within 1 year after discharge, 54% of adults had filled ≥1 EAI prescription (71% within 1 week) and 22% had ≥1 allergist/immunologist visit (53% within 4 weeks). Overall, 73 patients (5%) had evidence of a subsequent anaphylaxis-related ED visit and/or hospitalization 1 year after discharge. CONCLUSION: Concordance with recommended postdischarge anaphylaxis care was low among adults with food-induced anaphylaxis. Within 1 year after discharge, 54% of patients filled an EAI prescription and 22% consulted an allergist/immunologist.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Adulto , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Assistência de Longa Duração/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...