Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.

Sound disrupts short-term retention in working memory even when the sound is completely irrelevant and has to be ignored. The dominant view in the literature is that this type of disruption is essentially limited to so-called changing-state distractor sequences with acoustic changes between successive distractor objects (e.g., "ABABABAB") and does not occur with so-called steady-state distractor sequences that are composed of a single repeated distractor object (e.g., "AAAAAAAA"). Here we show that this view can no longer be maintained. What is more, disruption by steady-state distractors is significantly reduced after preexposure to the distractor item, directly confirming a central assumption of attentional explanations of auditory distraction and parallel to what has been shown earlier for changing-state sounds. Taken together, the findings reported here are compatible with a graded attentional account of auditory disruption, and they are incompatible with the duplex-mechanism account. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Reassessing the token set size effect on serial recall: Implications for theories of auditory distraction.

Sequences of auditory objects such as one-syllable words or brief sounds disrupt serial recall of visually presented targets even when the auditory objects are completely irrelevant for the task at hand. The token set size effect is a label for the claim that disruption increases only when moving from a 1-token distractor sequence (e.g., "AAAAAAAA") to a token set size of 2 (e.g., "ABABABAB") but remains constant when moving from a token set size of 2 to a larger token set size (e.g., "ABCABCAB" or "DAGCFBEH"). Here we show that this claim was incorrect and based on experiments with insufficient statistical power. With sufficient statistical power it can be shown that disruption increases not only when the distractor token set size increases from 1 to 2, but also when it increases from two to eight one-syllable words (Experiment 1) and brief instrumental sounds (Experiment 2). These findings have implications for theories of auditory distraction which differ in their predictions about whether the distractor-induced performance decrement should (a) only be determined by acoustic differences between immediately adjacent distractor tokens (duplex-mechanism account) or (b) gradually increase as a function of the variability in the distractor set (attentional account). The present data are inconsistent with the duplex-mechanism account and support the attentional account. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The impact of reference tones on the adjustment of interaural cues.

In the time-intensity trading paradigm, trading ratios are inconsistent in that they differ as a function of which cue is to be adjusted by the listener. Two explanations have been offered: First, the regression model assumes a regression to the interaural parameters of a reference tone played in alternation with the test tone to cause the phenomenon of inconsistent trading ratios. The second explanation is based on an inflated perceptual weighting of the to-be-adjusted cue. The perceptual-weight explanation has been supported by experimental results showing that the phenomenon of inconsistent trading ratios appears even in the absence of a reference tone. Those findings render regression as the sole explanation for inconsistent trading ratios implausible. The experiments presented in this paper address the question whether regression to the parameters of a reference tone plays a role if a reference tone is presented. Three experiments were conducted in which trials with and without reference tone were compared directly. Both within- and between-subject comparisons showed that a reference tone affects trading ratios and location judgments if present. Although regression cannot be the sole explanation for the phenomenon of inconsistent trading ratios it seems to play a role if a reference tone is presented.

The impact of practice on the adjustment of interaural cues in a lateralization task.

Lang and Buchner [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3120-3131 (2008)] conducted trading experiments showing that the phenomenon of different trading ratios depending on which cue is adjusted by the listener is independent of the presentation of an explicit reference tone. Four experiments were conducted to test whether implicit reference tones during the preceding practice phase may have caused the different trading ratios. The results of Lang and Buchner were replicated, showing that an implicit reference learned during the practice phase cannot account for different trading ratios in experiments without the presentation of a reference tone.

Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.

Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue: 500-Hz sine tones.

When interaural time differences and interaural intensity differences are set into opposition, the measured trading ratio depends on which cue is adjusted by the listener. In an earlier article [Lang, A.-G., and Buchner, A., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3120-3131 (2008)], four experiments showed that the perceived localization of a broad band sound for which differences in one cue were compensated by differences in the other cue such that the sound seemed to originate from a central position shifted back toward the location from which the sound appeared to originate before the adjustment. It was argued that attention shifted toward the effect of the to-be-adjusted cue during the compensation task, leading to an increased weighting of the to-be-adjusted cue. The use of broadband stimuli raises the question whether the "shift-back effect" was caused by attentional shifts to the effect of the to-be-adjusted binaural cue or by attention shifts to the particular frequency range which is most important for localizations based on the to-be-adjusted cue. Two experiments are reported in which sine tones of 500 Hz were used instead of broadband sounds. The shift-back effect could still be observed, supporting our original hypothesis. A control experiment showed that participants had accurate representations of the critical central position.

Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue.

When setting interaural time differences and interaural intensity differences into opposition the measured trading ratio depends on which of the cues is adjusted by the listener. This paper provides some evidence that the different trading ratios may be an effect of a shift of attention toward the to-be-adjusted cue. The experiments consisted of two phases. In the compensation phase, participants canceled out the effect of one preset binaural cue by adjusting a compensatory value of the other cue until the sound was located in the center. In the localization phase participants assessed the virtual location of the sounds, again using the preset values of the fixed cue, but using the values of the other cue as previously adjusted. The sounds were no longer perceived as originating from the center. Instead, their perceived location was shifted back toward the location from which they appeared to originate before the adjustment. These findings suggest that during the compensation task the to-be-adjusted sound localization cue received an increased weight compared to the other cue. We propose shifts of attention between the cues as a mechanism that could account for this finding.

G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.