Case Report: Recurrence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Bilateral Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The main causes of early respiratory failure after lung transplantation include primary graft dysfunction (PGD), acute rejection, and infection. This report describes a case of unclear early respiratory failure after bilateral lung transplantation for extensive COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We reviewed the patient file to investigate the course of the functional decline and evaluate reasons for early graft failure. Analyzed data included crossmatching results, biopsy results, HLA antibodies testing, bronchoalveolar lavages, respiratory parameters, and medications. RESULTS: After an initial excellent early postoperative course, the patient developed progressive respiratory failure, making re-implantation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support necessary. An extensive diagnostic workup revealed no signs of infection or rejection. Because the patient showed no signs of improvement with any treatment, lung-protective ventilation with the intermittent prone position was initiated. The patient's respiratory situation and bilateral opacities slowly improved over the next few weeks, and ECMO support was eventually discontinued. CONCLUSION: With no evidence of PGD, rejection, or infection, recurrent ARDS caused by a systemic immunologic process was seen as the only plausible cause for the patient's respiratory failure after lung transplantation. The fact that ARDS can develop extrapulmonarily, without direct viral or bacterial damage, makes us conclude that the preceding systemic activation and recruitment of immune cells by the primarily injured lung could potentially lead to the recurrence of ARDS even if the injured organ is removed.

A Dual-Lumen Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation Technique Using a Mobile X-Ray Device.

PURPOSE: Dual-lumen extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulation is considered technically challenging and harbors the risk of potential life-threatening complications during cannulation. Dual-lumen cannula insertion is performed under either ultrasound or fluoroscopy guidance. Both techniques have significant disadvantages, such as examiner dependence or the necessity for transportation of the patient from the intensive care unit to the operating room. DESCRIPTION: Digital, mobile x-ray devices provide a novel, examiner-independent imaging modality for bedside dual-lumen ECMO cannulation. EVALUATION: From November 2019 to November 2021, 23 dual-lumen cannulations were performed in 20 patients at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna. Twelve of 23 (52.2%) were inserted in the intensive care unit using a mobile x-ray device. The remaining patients (47.8%) were cannulated in the operating room with conventional fluoroscopy guidance. In none of the procedures did cardiovascular injuries occur. Insertion site bleeding was the most common ECMO-related complication (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-lumen cannulation using sequential x-rays can be performed safely. Especially for infectious patients or patients who require an awake ECMO, this technique overcomes disadvantages of established imaging modalities.

Lung Transplantation and Simultaneous Modified Ravitch Procedure.

Lung transplantation is an established treatment for a variety of end-stage lung diseases; however, chest wall deformities such as an asymmetric pectus excavatum are often considered a contraindication for lung transplantation. Consequently, the published experience of lung transplants and simultaneous chest wall reconstruction is limited to a few case reports. This article aims to provide a detailed description of surgical steps as well as technical challenges and pitfalls of lung transplantation with a simultaneous modified Ravitch procedure. Exemplary technical aspects will be discussed for a pediatric patient in whom such a combined procedure resulted in an excellent outcome.

Donor ventilation parameters as predictors for length of mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation: Results of a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of donor lungs heavily depends on the subjective judgment of the retrieval surgeon. As a consequence, acceptance rates vary significantly among transplant centers. We aimed to determine donor ventilation parameters in a prospective study and test if they could be used as objective quality criteria during organ retrieval. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of lung donors was performed in 3 transplant centers. Ventilation parameters were collected at the time of retrieval using a standardized ventilation protocol. Recipient length of mechanical ventilation (LMV) was defined as the primary end point, and collected data was used to build linear models predicting LMV. RESULTS: In total, 166 donors were included in this study. Median LMV after transplantation was 32 hours (interquartile range: 20-63 hours). Peak inspiratory pressure and dynamic compliance (Cdyn) at the time of retrieval, but not the partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio, correlated with recipient LMV in Spearman correlations (r = 0.280, p = 0.002; r = -0.245, p = 0.003; and r = 0.064, p = 0.432, respectively). Linear models were built to further evaluate the impact of donor ventilation parameters on LMV. The first model was based on donor P/F ratio, donor age, donor intubation time, donor smoking history, donor partial pressure of carbon dioxide, aspiration, chest trauma, and pathologic chest X-ray. This model performed poorly (multiple R-squared = 0.063). In a second model, donor ventilation parameters were included, and Cdyn was identified as the strongest predictor for LMV. The third model was extended by recipient factors, which significantly improved the robustness of the model (multiple R-squared = 0.293). CONCLUSION: In this prospective evaluation of donor lung parameters, currently used donor quality criteria poorly predicted recipient LMV. Our data suggest that Cdyn is a strong donor-bound parameter to predict short-term graft performance; however, recipient factors are similarly relevant.

Simultaneous pectus excavatum correction and lung transplantation-A case series.

Severe chest wall deformities are considered an absolute contraindication for lung transplantation. The significantly impaired chest compliance associated with pectus excavatum is thought to result in a high risk of postoperative respiratory complications and significant morbidity and mortality. We herein report our pooled institutional experience consisting of 3 patients who underwent bilateral lung transplantation and simultaneous correction of a pectus excavatum. Two of the patients were children and 1 patient had severe asymmetric pectus. All patients received a size-reduced double lung transplant and the deformity was corrected by a Nuss or modified Ravitch procedure. The perioperative course was complicated by prolonged weaning requiring tracheostomy in 2 of the 3 patients. However, long-term results were good and all 3 patients are alive in excellent clinical condition 72, 60, and 12 months after the transplantation. This case series demonstrates that patients with severe chest wall deformities should not a priori be excluded from lung transplantation, and a combined approach is feasible for selected patients.

[Recommendations for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in COVID-19 Patients]. / Empfehlungen für ECMO bei COVID-19-Patienten: Consensus Paper zur Extrakorporalen Membranoxygenierung der Medizinischen Universität Wien.

The pandemic from the SARS-CoV­2 Virus is currently challenging health care systems all over the world. Maintaining appropriate staffing and resources in healthcare facilities is essential to guarantee a safe work environment for healthcare personnel and safe patient care. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a valuable therapeutic option in patients with severe heart or lung failure. Although only a limited proportion of COVID-19 patients develops respiratory or circulatory failure that is refractory to conventional therapies, it is of utmost importance to clearly define criteria for the use of ECMOs in this steadily growing patient population. The ECMO working group of the Medical University of Vienna has established the following recommendations for ECMO support in COVID-19 patients.

Recommendations for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in COVID-19 patients : Consensus paper of the Medical University of Vienna.

The pandemic from the SARS-CoV­2 virus is currently challenging healthcare systems all over the world. Maintaining appropriate staffing and resources in healthcare facilities is essential to guarantee a safe working environment for healthcare personnel and safe patient care. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a valuable therapeutic option in patients with severe heart or lung failure. Although only a limited proportion of COVID-19 patients develop respiratory or circulatory failure that is refractory to conventional treatment, it is of utmost importance to clearly define criteria for the use of ECMO in this steadily growing patient population. The ECMO working group of the Medical University of Vienna has established the following recommendations for ECMO support in COVID-19 patients.

Impact of donor lung quality on post-transplant recipient outcome in the Lung Allocation Score era in Eurotransplant - a historical prospective study.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an impact of donation rates on the quality of lungs used for transplantation and whether donor lung quality affects post-transplant outcome in the current Lung Allocation Score era. All consecutive adult LTx performed in Eurotransplant (ET) between January 2012 and December 2016 were included (N = 3053). Donors used for LTx in countries with high donation rate were younger (42% vs. 33% ≤45 years, P < 0.0001), were less often smokers (35% vs. 46%, P < 0.0001), had more often clear chest X-rays (82% vs. 72%, P < 0.0001), had better donor oxygenation ratios (20% vs. 26% with PaO2 /FiO2  ≤ 300 mmHg, P < 0.0001), and had better lung donor score values (LDS; 28% vs. 17% with LDS = 6, P < 0.0001) compared with donors used for LTx in countries with low donation rate. Survival rates for the groups LDS = 6 and ≥7 at 5 years were 69.7% and 60.9% (P = 0.007). Lung donor quality significantly impacts on long-term patient survival. Countries with a low donation rate are more oriented to using donor lungs with a lesser quality compared to countries with a high donation rate. Instead of further stretching donor eligibility criteria, the full potential of the donor pool should be realized.

Lung Transplant Patients on Kilimanjaro.

BACKGROUND: After its initial difficulties were overcome, lung transplantation became an accepted and effective treatment for end-stage lung disease. Patients can take part in almost all kinds of sports after lung transplantation, including high-altitude mountaineering, which is an extreme sport even for healthy individuals. Several articles have been published about high-altitude tolerance of transplanted patients. However, this was the first high-altitude expedition that included only lung transplant patients. METHODS: The Vienna lung transplantation team organized an expedition in 2017 to conquer the peak of Mount Kilimanjaro, which consisted of 10 lung transplanted patients and 24 accompanying medical personnel. The participants were tested before and several times during the hike to evaluate their general and cardiopulmonary status, the severity of altitude sickness, and radio-morphologic changes. The results of the lung transplanted patients were compared to the results of their healthy companions. RESULTS: The group started at 2360 meters and reached the 5895-meter-high summit of Mount Kilimanjaro after 6 days on June 18, 2017. Eight transplant patients and 24 escorting medical personnel reached the peak. This means that the success rate was 94%, which is significantly higher than the reported 85% for this route. The 2 transplant patients who did not make the summit turned back on the first and second day because they lacked the necessary fitness for the trip. We did not see a significant difference in the results regarding cardiopulmonary status or the severity of altitude sickness, although we observed mildly higher blood pressure and altitude sickness score results in the lung transplant group. CONCLUSION: Based on our experiences, we can state that a stable patient after lung transplantation who attains the necessary physical fitness can achieve similar or even better physical results than an average healthy individual.

First 3 Years of the Hungarian Lung Transplantation Program.

In this article we summarize the results of the first 3 years after launching the Hungarian Lung Transplantation Program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first lung transplant in Hungary was carried out on December 12, 2015, with the collaboration of the National Institute of Oncology and the Semmelweis University. Up to December 31, 2018, a total of 62 lung transplants were performed. Data were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were listed for lung transplant after the indication was established by the National Lung Transplantation Committee. Donor lungs were procured from brain-dead donors only. RESULTS: Within this period our team was involved in 87 lung procurements, 61 of which resulted in bilateral lung transplant and 1 in single-sided transplant. The operative approach was unilateral thoracotomy (n = 1), bilateral thoracotomy (n = 1), or clamshell incision (n = 60) with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. The underlying disease of the recipients was obstructive lung disease (n = 30), lung fibrosis (n = 11), cystic fibrosis (n = 18), primary pulmonary hypertension (n = 2), histiocytosis-X syndrome (n = 1), bronchiectasis (n = 2), lymphangioleiomyomatosis (n = 1), and retransplant because of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (n = 1). The youngest patient was 13 years of age, while the oldest was 65 years. Three patients died in the early postoperative phase. One-year survival was 80%. DISCUSSION: The number of cases rises steadily in the Hungarian Lung Transplantation Program, which is exceptional compared with the start of other centrums. The incidence of complications and mortality is comparable with those of other experienced centers around the world. Our future goal is to broaden our waiting list, thus increasing the number of lung transplants carried out.

Donation After Cardiac Death, a Possibility to Expand the Donor Pool: Review and the Hungarian Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplantation is the only successful treatment option for patients experiencing end-stage lung disease. Results have improved significantly in the last decade; however, the number one limiting factor is still the shortage of donor lungs. Due to the discrepancy between available donor lungs and patients awaiting lung transplantation, many centers have reintroduced donation after cardiac death (DCD). According to their results, DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) are comparable in terms of survival and graft function. Currently in Hungary, donation is only allowed from DBD donors; however, due to the Eurotransplant agreement, non-heart-beating donation (NHBD) organs can be transplanted into Hungarian patients, and in some cases Hungarian transplant teams can also take part in NHBDs within the Eurotransplant region. The Hungarian experience. A Hungarian patient received a lung from a 15-year-old uncontrolled DCD in Vienna. The donor was reanimated for 54 minutes and after lung procurement the lungs were put on ex vivo lung perfusion and later successfully implanted into the Hungarian recipient. The recovery was very successful and the patient is still alive. The Hungarian Lung Transplantation Team was involved in a controlled Maastricht III donation in 2017. A 49-year-old female donor was reported from Ghent, Belgium. A multiorgan donation was carried out with 15 minutes of warm ischemic time in the case of the lungs. CONCLUSION: DCD is an effective, safe, and available method to increase the donor pool. In the case of controlled donations, the necessary protocols have already been prepared. Although DBD is working very successfully in Hungary, infrastructural developments, education of professionals, and social preparations are all needed to implement a DCD protocol in Hungary.

Twenty-year experience with extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal life support is increasingly used to bridge deteriorating candidates to lung transplantation. Nevertheless, only few systematic reports with a limited number of patients exist describing this practice and its changes over time. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database and performed an era analysis to identify trends over time and risk factors for mortality. After applying propensity score matching, outcomes of bridged patients were compared with those of standard lung transplantation recipients. RESULTS: Extracorporeal life support was used in 120 patients as an intention to bridge to lung transplantation. Eleven patients (9.2%) were bridged between 1998 and 2004, 39 patients (32.5%) were bridged between 2005 and 2010, and 70 patients were bridged (58.3%) between 2010 and 2017. In the first era, the main bridging modality was venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 10, 90.9%), whereas venovenous devices were primarily used in later eras (second era: n = 18, 46.2%; third era: n = 39, 55.8%). In the second and third eras, 9 patients (23.1%) and 24 patients (34.3%) could be bridged awake. Short-term outcome was poor in the first era, with only 36.4% of patients discharged alive but improved in later eras (53.8% and 77.1%; P = .002). Extracorporeal life support-bridged patients showed an impaired short-term outcome compared with standard recipients. However, survival conditional on 90 days did not differ among the groups (P = .178). In univariate and multivariate analyses, awake extracorporeal life support was protective for survival, whereas acute retransplantation was a risk factor for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 2 decades, the role of extracorporeal life support bridging evolved from an acute rescue therapy to a semi-elective procedure. Stratified outcome analysis revealed that extracorporeal life support bridging yielded similar long-term survival compared with nonbridged patients.

Alemtuzumab induction combined with reduced maintenance immunosuppression is associated with improved outcomes after lung transplantation: A single centre experience.

QUESTION ADDRESSED BY THE STUDY: The value of induction therapy in lung transplantation is controversial. According to the ISHLT, only about 50% of patients transplanted within the last 10 years received induction therapy. We reviewed our institutional experience to investigate the impact of induction therapy on short- and long-term outcomes. MATERIALS/PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2015, 446 patients with a complete follow-up were included in this retrospective analysis. Analysis comprised long-term kidney function, infectious complications, incidence of rejection and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients received alemtuzumab, 50 patients antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and 165 patients did not receive induction therapy (NI). The alemtuzumab group revealed the lowest rate of chronic kidney insufficiency (NI: 52.2%; ATG: 60%; alemtuzumab: 36.6%; p = 0.001). Both, the NI group (p<0.001) and the ATG group (p = 0.010) showed a significant increase of serum creatinine during follow-up compared to alemtuzumab patients. Furthermore, alemtuzumab group experienced the lowest rate of infection in the first year after transplantation. Finally, improved survival, low rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis (LB) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) were found in patients treated either with alemtuzumab or ATG. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab induction therapy followed by reduced maintenance immunosuppression is associated with a better kidney function compared to no induction and ATG. Survival rate as well as freedom from ACR and CLAD were comparable between alemtuzumab and ATG.

[The start of the Hungarian lung transplantation program and the first results]. / A magyar tüdotranszplantációs program indulása és elso eredményei.

The first lung transplantation in Hungary was performed on 12th of December, 2015. It was a joint effort of the National Institute of Oncology and the Semmelweis University. Hereby we summarise the results and experiences from the first three years. Until August, 2018, 55 lung transplantations were performed in Hungary. This was a retrospective analysis. All patients were listed according to the recommendation of the Lung Transplantation Committee. All implanted lungs have been procured from brain dead donors. Postoperative treatment and rehabilitation of the patients were continued at the Semmelweis University. Between 12. 12. 2015 and 31. 07. 2018, our team performed 76 organ retrievals: out of 45 Hungarian offers, 23 came from Eurotransplant countries and 8 outside of the Eurotransplant region. From these donations, 54 double and 1 single side transplantations were successfully performed. The surgical approach was single side thoracotomy (n = 1), bilateral thoracotomy (n = 1) and in the majority of the cases clamshell incision (n = 53). For the intraoperative veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was used. The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support had to be prolonged in 3 patients into the early postoperative period, two other recipients were bridged to transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In the same time period, one combined lung-kidney transplantation was also performed. The distribution of recipients according to the underlying disease was: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 28); idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 8); cystic fibrosis (n = 12); primary pulmonary hypertension (n = 2); hystiocytosis-X (n = 1); bronchiectasis (n = 2); lymphangioleiomyomatosis (n = 1); and re-transplantation following bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (n = 1), respectively. The mean age of recipients was 47.5 ± 15.18 years. The youngest recipient was 13 years old. We unfortunately lost 12 patients on our waiting list. The mean intensive care unit stay was 24.6 ± 18.18 days. Two patients were lost in the early postoperative phase. Tracheostomy was necessary in 13 cases due to the need of prolonged ventilation. 1-year survival of the recipients was 82.96% (until 31. 07. 2018). When looking at the first three years of the program, the case numbers elevated quickly throughout the years which is rather unique when compared to other centres in their starting period. Perioperative mortality and morbidity is comparable with high-volume lung transplantation centres. In the future we would like to increase the number of patients on the waiting list, thus increasing the total number of transplantations performed, and we are also planning to implement the use of the ex vivo lung perfusion system (EVLP) in our program. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(46): 1859-1868.

[Minimally invasive resection of nonpalpable pulmonary nodules after wire- and isotope-guided localization]. / Nem tapintható tüdogócok drót- és izotópjelölés segítségével történo minimálinvazív mutéti eltávolítása.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays ever smaller, sub-centimetre lung nodules are screened and diagnosed. For these, minimally invasive resection is strongly recommended both with diagnostic and therapeutic purpose. AIM: Despite many advantages of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, thorough palpation of the lung lobes and thus the localization of lung nodules are still limited. There are several options to solve this problem. From the possibilities we have chosen and tried wire- and isotope-guided lung nodule localization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2017, at the Thoracic Surgery Department of the National Institute of Oncology we performed wire- and isotope-guided minimally invasive pulmonary nodule resection in five patients. The diameter of the lung nodules was between 0.5 and 1.2 cm. The age of the patients was between 44 and 65 years and none of them had severe comorbidities, which meant low risk for complications. RESULTS: We successfully performed the minimally invasive atypical resection in all cases. After the wire and isotope placement we found a 2-3 mm pneumothorax in one patient that did not need urgent drainage. In another patient we found that high amount of intraparenchymal bleeding surrounded the channel of the wire. During the operation, two wires were displaced when the lung collapsed, and in another case the mentioned bleeding got into the thoracic cavity and made it difficult to detect the nodule. In one case we resected the wire-guided lung tissue, but the isotope-guided lung nodule was below the resection line. CONCLUSION: Both techniques could help to localize the non-palpable lung nodules. Based on our initial experiences, the isotope-guided method provides more details to estimate the exact depth of the nodule from the visceral surface of the pleura and we can avoid the unpleasantness of wire displacement. On the other hand, the production of the isotope requires a more developed infrastructure and the exact timing of the operation after the isotope injection is more strict. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(34): 1399-1404.

Intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the possibility of postoperative prolongation improve survival in bilateral lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The value of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in lung transplantation remains controversial. In our department, ECMO has been used routinely for intraoperatively unstable patients for more than 15 years. Recently, we have extended its indication to a preemptive application in almost all cases. In addition, we prolong ECMO into the early postoperative period whenever graft function does not meet certain quality criteria or in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. The objective of this study was to review the results of this strategy. METHODS: All standard bilateral lung transplantations performed between January 2010 and June 2016 were included in this single-center, retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group I-no ECMO (n = 116), group II-intraoperative ECMO (n = 343), and group III-intraoperative and prolonged postoperative ECMO (n = 123). The impact of different ECMO strategies on primary graft function, short-term outcomes, and patient survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The use of intraoperative ECMO was associated with improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival compared with non-ECMO patients (91% vs 82%, 85% vs 76%, and 80% vs 74%; log-rank P = .041). This effect was still evident after propensity score matching of both cohorts. Despite the high number of complex patients in group III, outcome was excellent with higher survival rates than in the non-ECMO group at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ECMO results in superior survival when compared with transplantation without any extracorporeal support. The concept of prophylactic postoperative ECMO prolongation is associated with excellent outcomes in recipients with pulmonary hypertension and in patients with questionable graft function at the end of implantation.