A shared understanding of purposeful caregiving: Reply to Hill, Wynn, and Carpenter (2020).

Replies to comments made by P. L. Hill, M. J. Wynn, and B. D. Carpenter (see record 2019-81943-006) on the original article by S. F. Lang and B. J. Fowers (see record 2018-24691-001). Hill, Wynn, and Carpenter's (2020) discussion of Alzheimer's caregiving being motivated by purposeful engagement is a welcome perspective. Their views are timely, given the growing literature on caregiving as a deeply meaningful and worthwhile activity. Hill et al., however, focus on caregivers' subjective perception of caregiving as purposeful, disregarding the source of this perspective. It is reasonable to see the shared relationship history between caregivers and their loved ones as a primary source of the purposefulness of caregiving. This reply offers an integration of caregivers' purposeful activity with shared identity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

An expanded theory of Alzheimer's caregiving.

The ancient and cross-culturally prevalent pattern of caregiving suggests that long-term caregiving is species characteristic for humans. If so, then an evolutionary account of the adaptation(s) that underwrite this caregiving is necessary, particularly for the one-sided and long-term nature of Alzheimer's caregiving. Four standard evolutionary explanations are evaluated: kin selection theory, the grandmother hypothesis, direct reciprocity, and indirect reciprocity. Each is found inadequate to explain caregiving because of the lack of reproductive benefits. These evolutionary accounts also assume that relationships are only valuable to the degree that they provide benefits and that relationship partners are predominantly motivated by self-interest. Attachment provides another explanation, which evolved initially to ensure infant protection and nurturance, but was exapted for important adult relationships. Attachment relationships naturally include caregiving and engender long-term relational commitment. Yet attachment theory is ambiguous about whether relationships are maintained for the sake of security benefits or because they have inherent value. This ambiguity undermines the explanatory value of attachment theory for Alzheimer's caregiving. Therefore, a shared identity theory is offered that highlights the inherent value of the relationship and the loved one, transcending the predominant focus on beneficial individual outcomes. The theory emphasizes the frequent human motivation to benefit others because of their mutual commitment, shared identity, and shared goals. The conclusion is that fully understanding and supporting the arduous efforts of caregiving for loved ones with Alzheimer's requires psychologists to fully appreciate and support the deep and meaningful motivations that often inspire the humanity seen in caregiving. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

On properly characterizing moral agency.

Doris (2015b) develops a theory of moral agency to avoid a skeptical challenge arising from psychology studies indicating that (im)moral behavior is caused by trivial situational factors. His theory is flawed in attending only to situational influences on behavior and neglecting individual differences such as moral identity and virtue. A focus on individual differences in resilience to influence from trivial situational factors defangs the skeptical challenge and offers a better account of moral agency.

Enhancing relationship quality measurement: The development of the Relationship Flourishing Scale.

Relationship quality is the most frequently assessed construct in the intimate relationships literature. Dozens of assessment instruments exist, but the vast majority conceptualize relationship quality in terms of satisfaction (or a similar construct), which focuses on the hedonic (pleasure or happiness) dimension of the relationship. Some scholars question whether the richness and depth of adult intimate relationships can be captured by satisfaction ratings and suggest focusing on a complementary eudaimonic (human flourishing) dimension of the relationship. This study evaluates the development of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, a 12-item measure of eudaimonic relationship quality that assesses meaning, personal growth, relational giving, and goal sharing. The study supports the construct validity of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, including its content, concurrent, convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Its incremental validity and independence suggest that it provides information about deeper and richer aspects of relationship quality than do current hedonic relationship quality measures. (PsycINFO Database Record