National Trends in Lumbar Puncture from 2010 to 2018: A Shift Reversal from the Emergency Department to the Hospital Setting for Radiologists and Advanced Practice Providers.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior research has shown substantial shifts in procedure shares between specialty groups providing lumbar punctures. Our aim was to analyze national trends in lumbar punctures among the Medicare population from 2010 to 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medicare Part B Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed for all Current Procedural Terminology, Version 4 codes related to lumbar punctures (62270 and 62272). Lumbar puncture procedure volume and utilization rates were assessed and stratified by place of service and specialty background of the providers. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, the overall number of lumbar puncture procedures essentially has not changed (92,579 versus 92,533). Radiologists hold the largest and an increasing procedure share of diagnostic and overall lumbar punctures (overall share, 45.7% in 2010 [n = 42,296] versus 52.3% in 2018 [n = 48,414]). Advanced practice providers have increased their procedure share (3.7% in 2010 [n = 3388] versus 8.4% in 2018 [n = 7785], + 129.8% procedure volume). Emergency medicine physicians and neurologists have a decreasing procedure share (21.8% versus 15.3% and 12.5% versus 8.8%, respectively). The inpatient hospital setting remains the largest place of service for lumbar punctures, recording a 5.3% increase in procedure share. The emergency department lumbar puncture volume has declined, with a 7.4% decrease in the overall procedure share. Similarly, the hospital outpatient department procedure volume has increased (+4%), while the private office volume has decreased (-1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: During the past decade, lumbar puncture procedures among the Medicare population have remained stable, with a shift in procedure volume from the emergency department and private offices to the hospital setting, which has mainly affected radiologists and advanced practice providers.

Gemcitabine uptake in glioblastoma multiforme: potential as a radiosensitizer.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most frequent malignant brain tumor, has a poor prognosis, but is relatively sensitive to radiation. Both gemcitabine and its metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) are potent radiosensitizers. The aim of this phase 0 study was to investigate whether gemcitabine passes the blood-tumor barrier, and is phosphorylated in the tumor by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to gemcitabine nucleotides in order to enable radiosensitization, and whether it is deaminated by deoxycytidine deaminase (dCDA) to dFdU. Gemcitabine was administered at 500 or 1000 mg/m(2) just before surgery to 10 GBM patients, who were biopsied after 1-4 h. Plasma gemcitabine and dFdU levels varied between 0.9 and 9.2 microM and 24.9 and 72.6 microM, respectively. Tumor gemcitabine and dFdU levels varied from 60 to 3580 pmol/g tissue and from 29 to 72 nmol/g tissue, respectively. The gene expression of dCK (beta-actin ratio) varied between 0.44 and 2.56. The dCK and dCDA activities varied from 1.06 to 2.32 nmol/h/mg protein and from 1.51 to 5.50 nmol/h/mg protein, respectively. These enzyme levels were sufficient to enable gemcitabine phosphorylation, leading to 130-3083 pmol gemcitabine nucleotides/g tissue. These data demonstrate for the first time that gemcitabine passes the blood-tumor barrier in GBM patients. In tumor samples, both gemcitabine and dFdU concentrations are high enough to enable radiosensitization, which warrants clinical studies using gemcitabine in combination with radiation.

No evidence of gemcitabine accumulation during weekly administration.

Some anticancer agents tend to accumulate during repeated administration. We determined whether gemcitabine or its metabolites would accumulate during repeated administration. Gemcitabine was administered over two courses with each course consisting of a 30-min infusion at 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest. In 14 patients we evaluated eventual accumulation by comparing the concentrations in blood samples taken before, and at 30 and 60 min after the start of infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, in both cycles. At the end of the infusion gemcitabine concentrations at day 1 of both courses varied between 18 and 77 microM and at day 15 between 13 and 90 microM. The mean ratios day 8/day 1 and day 15/day 1 varied from 0.94 to 1.18. For the inactive metabolite 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (dFdU) these values varied between 54 and 152 microM and 55 and 157, respectively, and the ratios from 0.96 to 1.08. The concentration of the active metabolite of gemcitabine, gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) in peripheral white blood cells, ranged between 37 and 283 pmol/10(6) cells at the end of infusion on day 1 and 35 and 115 pmol/10(6) cells on day 15. Potential accumulation was evaluated using a mixed effects model and no evidence was observed of accumulation for either gemcitabine or its metabolites. Gemcitabine can be administered safely without the risk that the drug will accumulate.

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was performed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty chemo-naïve patients with measurable locoregionally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were included; the median patient age was 53 years (range 35-71). Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 50 mg/m2, given in 1 h intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, followed after 24 h by gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m2 given in 30 min i.v. on days 2, 9 and 16, every 28 days. RESULTS: A median number of four therapy cycles were given (range 2-8). Myelosuppresion was the most important toxicity. Grade 3-4 thrombopenia was observed in 19 patients (48%) and grade 3-4 leukopenia was observed in 23 (58%). Myelotoxicity was cumulative and caused omission of gemcitabine on day 16 in 55% of cycles. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting. Objective responses were observed in 30% of patients including two complete remissions and 10 partial remissions. Median survival was 11 months (range 3-27+). CONCLUSIONS: This cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen had moderate efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, with manageable toxicity. Further studies with this combination may be warranted.

Gemcitabine-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

A feasibility study was performed to assess the toxicity and efficacy of a combination of gemcitabine-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). 24 patients (15 females and 9 males) with measurable LAPC were included; the median age of the patients was 63 years (range 39-74 years). The performance status ranged from 0 to 2. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 300 mg/m(2), concurrent with radiotherapy, three fractions of 8 Gy, on days 1, 8 and 15. When compliance allowed, gemcitabine alone was continued thereafter, at 1000 mg/m(2), weekly times 3, every 4 weeks, depending on the response and toxicity. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The objective response rate was 29.2% (1 complete remission+6 partial remissions); 12 patients had stable disease. However, 2 of the radiological partial remissions were shown to be complete remissions by pathology assessment. Median duration of response was 3 months (range 1-35+months). Median time to progression was 7 months (range 2-37+months). Median survival was 10 months (range 3-37+months). Dose reduction or omission of gemcitabine was necessary in 10 patients. Non-haematological toxicity consisted of 87.5% nausea and vomiting grade I-II, diarrhoea 54%, ulceration in stomach and duodenum 37.5% (20.8% ulceration with bleeding); 1 patient developed a fistula between the duodenum and aorta, 5 months after treatment. Anaemia grade III-IV was observed in 8.3% of the patients. Neutropenia grade III-IV was observed in 8.3%, thrombocytopenia grades III-IV in 16.7%. In 1 patient who underwent resection postchemoradiation, no viable tumour cells were found. In addition, in the patient who suddenly died of a fistula between the duodenum and aorta, no viable tumour cells were detectable at autopsy. Although the toxicity of this treatment was occasionally severe, the response and survival are encouraging and warrant further studies of this combination.

Rational approach to patients with unintentional weight loss.

Unintentional weight loss is a problem encountered frequently in clinical practice. Weight loss and low body weight have potentially serious clinical implications. Although a nonspecific observation, weight loss is often of concern to both patients and physicians. There are multiple potential etiologies and special factors to consider in selected groups, such as older adults. A rational approach to these patients is based on an understanding of the relevant biologic, psychological, and social factors identified during a thorough history and physical examination. The goal of this article is to discuss the clinical importance, review potential pathophysiology, and discuss specific etiologies of unintentional weight loss that will enable the clinician to formulate a practical stepwise approach to patient evaluation and management.

[Team care: a necessity for a child with HIV infection]. / Teamzorg: een noodzaak voor het met HIV geïnfecteerde kind.

In four children, a boy aged 2.5 years, a girl of 4, her brother of 7 years and a girl aged 10 months, HIV infection was diagnosed. Since 1996 HIV-infected children in the Netherlands are treated with a combination of two nucleoside analogs and a protease-inhibitor. This therapy improves the quality of life, increases the life expectancy of HIV-infected children and is generally well tolerated. However, the current combination therapy is complex and puts a burden on the child and the family. Therefore, long term compliance will be difficult. Moreover, the majority of the families have extremely difficult social circumstances which interfere with an optimal medical treatment for the child. The parents of three of the children were refugees from African countries. Intensive support of the family by a team of health care and social workers is usually necessary to make antiretroviral combination therapy possible. Care directed at the individual needs of the child and family is crucial to help this vulnerable group of children and families in our society.

Comparison of three doses of ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Ursodeoxycholic acid in doses of 13-15 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1), is a safe and cost-effective treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. However, very limited information exists regarding the most appropriate dose of ursodeoxycholic acid. The aim of the study was to compare three dosages of ursodeoxycholic acid with respect to changes in liver biochemistries, Mayo risk score, biliary enrichment with ursodeoxycholic acid and side effects over at least a 1-year period. METHODS: A total of 155 patients were randomized to receive low- (5-7 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)), standard-(13-15 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)), and high- (23-25 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) doses of ursodeoxycholic acid. RESULTS: The improvements in alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.0001), aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.0001), Mayo risk score (p = 0.002), and ursodeoxycholic acid enrichment (p = 0.0001) were significantly greater in the standard- and high-dose groups compared to the low-dose group, but not between the standard- and high-dose groups. Changes in serum bilirubin were similar between the three groups (p = 0.07). No significant effects on symptoms were noted with any dose. No patients discontinued ursodeoxycholic acid because of side effects or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Ursodeoxycholic acid in doses of 5-25 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) is safe and well tolerated. The dose of 13-15 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) appears to be the preferred dose for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

The combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: the results of a pilot study.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and methotrexate (MTX) have both been proposed as treatments for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). It has been suggested that a combination of the two drugs may offer advantages over either used separately. In this pilot study, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combination for patients with PBC. Thirty-two patients with antimitochondrial antibody positive PBC were prospectively entered into a pilot study and received UDCA, 13 to 15 mg/kg/d, in conjunction with MTX, 0.25 mg/kg/wk, for a period of 2 years. The results of this treatment were compared with those obtained from 180 patients with PBC studied in a placebo-controlled trial of UDCA alone conducted during the same period. Patients in the pilot study and randomized study were comparable with regard to age, gender, and liver biochemistries. The UDCA/MTX-treated patients were of earlier histologic stage and had a lower mean Mayo risk score. During this period, seven patients in the UDCA/MTX group were withdrawn, four for pulmonary toxicity (two who required hospitalization), and one each with mouth ulcer, extreme fatigue, and hair loss. The use of UDCA/MTX was not associated with improvement in symptoms. In the patients receiving UDCA/MTX, biochemical changes were comparable to those of patients receiving UDCA alone but superior to those in the placebo group (P < .05). Histological changes were comparable in all groups at 2 years. Cessation of MTX while UDCA was continued led to no deterioration in liver biochemistries.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was conducted in 180 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) to define the efficacy and safety of UDCA. Efficacy was assessed by time to treatment failure defined as death; liver transplantation; histological progression; development of varices, ascites, or encephalopathy; doubling of total serum bilirubin levels; progression of fatigue or pruritus; drug toxicity; or voluntary withdrawal. METHODS: Patients with well-defined PBC underwent complete history, physical examination, liver chemistries, ultrasonography, upper endoscopy, and liver biopsy at entry as well as at 2 years. Liver chemistries were determined every 3 months. RESULTS: In patients receiving UDCA, treatment failure was delayed compared with the placebo-treated group (P = 0.0003, log rank test). Seven patients receiving UDCA died or required transplantation compared with 12 in the placebo group (P = 0.18). No patients discontinued UDCA because of side effects of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: UDCA was extraordinarily safe and well tolerated, and its use was associated with delayed progression of the disease as defined in this study. However, the lack of effects on symptoms, histology, and the need for liver transplantation or survival indicate that further evaluation is necessary to determine the ultimate role of UDCA in the treatment of PBC.

Long-term versus short-term treatment with recombinant interferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a prospective, randomized treatment trial.

We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to study the efficacy and tolerance of long-term versus short-term treatment with recombinant interferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Ten patients were randomly assigned to a 6-month interferon regimen, and 10 patients were assigned to a 3-week interferon trial. Eleven patients (five assigned to long-term treatment and six to short-term treatment) did not complete interferon therapy: eight had either severe thrombocytopenia or neutropenia; one had pronounced fatigue in relationship to administration of interferon; one had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and sepsis and died; and one had a massive fatal variceal hemorrhage during interferon therapy. Most of the serious hematologic complications occurred in patients with cirrhosis and hypersplenism. In one patient, seroconversion to hepatitis B virus DNA negativity occurred before the onset of treatment. Four of the five patients able to complete the 6-month interferon regimen and only one of four patients able to complete the 3-week trial had seroconversion to hepatitis B virus DNA negativity. Thus, we conclude that the therapeutic response was better among patients who were able to complete a 6-month interferon trial. In patients with cirrhosis and hypersplenism, development of either severe thrombocytopenia or leukopenia associated with interferon therapy precluded completion of treatment.

Fulminant hepatitis: Mayo Clinic experience with 34 cases.

From 1974 through 1982, fulminant hepatitis was diagnosed in 34 patients at our institution. Of these patients, only two survived (survival rate, 6%). This syndrome was caused by viruses (B and non-B hepatitis and herpes simplex) in 23 patients, hepatotoxic drug in 6, Wilson's disease (hepatolenticular degeneration) in 3, and industrial poisons in 2. Most of the patients died within 10 days after the onset of encephalopathy. The poor prognosis in our group of patients was probably related to the preponderance of older patients and cases caused by non-B hepatitis virus. In our patients, the clinical course was complicated by renal failure, ascites, bleeding, sepsis, pancreatitis, and seizures. The major cause of death was hepatic failure.