The effects of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition by sacubitril/valsartan on adipose tissue transcriptome and protein expression in obese hypertensive patients.

Increased activation of the renin-angiotensin system is involved in the onset and progression of cardiometabolic diseases, while natriuretic peptides (NP) may exert protective effects. We have recently demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, which blocks the angiotensin II type-1 receptor and augments natriuretic peptide levels, improved peripheral insulin sensitivity in obese hypertensive patients. Here, we investigated the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (400 mg QD) treatment for 8 weeks on the abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT) phenotype compared to the metabolically neutral comparator amlodipine (10 mg QD) in 70 obese hypertensive patients. Abdominal subcutaneous AT biopsies were collected before and after intervention to determine the AT transcriptome and expression of proteins involved in lipolysis, NP signaling and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. Both sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine treatment did not significantly induce AT transcriptional changes in pathways related to lipolysis, NP signaling and oxidative metabolism. Furthermore, protein expression of adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) (Ptime*group = 0.195), hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) (Ptime*group = 0.458), HSL-ser660 phosphorylation (Ptime*group = 0.340), NP receptor-A (NPRA) (Ptime*group = 0.829) and OXPHOS complexes (Ptime*group = 0.964) remained unchanged. In conclusion, sacubitril/valsartan treatment for 8 weeks did not alter the abdominal subcutaneous AT transcriptome and expression of proteins involved in lipolysis, NP signaling and oxidative metabolism in obese hypertensive patients.

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interaction of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) and Sildenafil in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension.

Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is indicated for the treatment of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Since patients with HFrEF may receive sacubitril/valsartan and sildenafil, both increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate, the present study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interaction potential between sacubitril/valsartan and sildenafil. In this open-label, three-period, single sequence study, patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (153.8 ± 8.2 mmHg mean systolic blood pressure (SBP)) received a single dose of sildenafil 50 mg, sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg once daily for 5 days, and sacubitril/valsartan and sildenafil coadministration. When coadministered with sildenafil, the AUC and Cmax of valsartan decreased by 29% and 39%, respectively. Coadministration of sacubitril/valsartan and sildenafil resulted in a greater decrease in BP (-5/-4/-4 mmHg mean ambulatory SBP/DBP/MAP (mean arterial pressure)) than with sacubitril/valsartan alone. Both treatments were generally safe and well tolerated in this study; however, the additional BP reduction suggests that sildenafil should be administered cautiously in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan. Unique identifier: NCT01601470.

Improved Insulin Sensitivity With Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition in Individuals With Obesity and Hypertension.

Natriuretic peptide (NP) deficiency and sustained renin-angiotensin system activation are associated with impaired oxidative metabolism and predispose to type-2 diabetes. We hypothesized that sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), which augments NP through neprilysin inhibition while blocking angiotensin II type-1 (AT1 )-receptors, improves insulin sensitivity, lipid mobilization, and oxidation. After 8 weeks of treatment of obese patients with hypertension, sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg q.d., but not amlodipine 10 mg q.d., was associated with a significant increase from baseline in the insulin sensitivity index (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp), and tended to be higher in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan compared to amlodipine. Abdominal adipose tissue interstitial glycerol concentrations increased with sacubitril/valsartan, but decreased with amlodipine. Whole-body lipolysis and substrate oxidation did not change with either treatment. Results confirm that sacubitril/valsartan treatment leads to a metabolic benefit in the study population and supports the relevance of neprilysin inhibition along with AT1 -receptor blockade in the regulation of human glucose and lipid metabolism.

In vitro and clinical evaluation of OATP-mediated drug interaction potential of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696).

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has been recently approved for the treatment of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction. Several HF patients receive statins as co-medication. METHODS: Because clearance of statins is meditated via OATP1B1/1B3, the inhibition potential of these transporters by LCZ696 analytes was evaluated in vitro. Furthermore, an open-label, fixed-sequence clinical study was conducted to determine the effect of LCZ696 on the exposure of simvastatin and its active metabolite simvastatin acid. In this clinical study, 26 healthy subjects received simvastatin 40 mg alone or in combination with LCZ696 or after 1 or 2 h of LCZ696 dosing. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Although no significant inhibition by LBQ657 (an active metabolite of sacubitril) and valsartan was observed, sacubitril inhibited OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in vitro, with IC50 of 1·91 and 3·81 µm, respectively. Upon co-administration of simvastatin with LCZ696, the Cmax of simvastatin and simvastatin acid decreased by 7% and 13%, respectively. When administered 1 h after LCZ696 dosing, the corresponding Cmax of simvastatin and simvastatin acid decreased by 16% and 4%, respectively. When administered 2 h after LCZ696 dosing, the Cmax of simvastatin decreased by 33% and that of simvastatin acid increased by 16%. However, no notable changes were observed in the AUCs of simvastatin or simvastatin acid upon co-administration or time-separated administration with LCZ696. No notable impact of simvastatin co-administration was observed on the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 analytes. LCZ696 and simvastatin were generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results of this study suggest that although sacubitril inhibited OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in vitro, it does not translate into any clinically relevant in vivo effect.

A new model of congestive heart failure in the mouse due to chronic volume overload.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, deletion of specific genes by so called knock-out techniques has become important for investigating the pathogenesis of various diseases. This form of genetic engineering is widely performed in murine models. There are, however, only a limited number of mouse models available in cardiovascular pathology. The objective of this study, therefore, was to develop a new model of overt congestive heart failure associated with myocardial hypertrophy in the mouse. METHODS: Female C57/BL6 mice weighing 19-20 g were anesthetized with ether. After abdominal incision, the aorta was temporarily clamped proximal to the renal arteries. The aorta was then punctured with a needle (outer diameter 0.6 mm) and the needle was further advanced into the adjacent vena cava. After withdrawal of the needle, the aortic puncture site was sealed with cyanoacrylate glue. The clamp was removed, and the patency of the shunt was visually verified as swelling and mixing of venous and arterial blood in the vena cava. Sham-operated mice served as controls. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality of mice with aortocaval shunt was 42%. Four weeks after shunt induction, mice showed a significant cardiac hypertrophy with a relative heart weight of 7.5+/-0.2 mg/100 g body weight (vs. 5.1+/-0.7 mg/100 g in control mice, P<0.001). While no changes in blood pressure and heart rate occurred, left ventricular enddiastolic pressure was significantly increased in mice with shunt, and left ventricular contractility was impaired from 6331+/-412 to 4170+/-296 mmHg/s (P<0.05). Plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and its second messenger cGMP as humoral markers of heart failure as well as ventricular expression of ANP- and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)-mRNA were significantly increased in mice with shunt compared to control mice. CONCLUSIONS: The aortocaval shunt in the mouse constitutes a new model of overt congestive heart failure with impaired hemodynamic parameters and may be a useful tool to investigate the role of particular genes in the development of heart failure.

Differential regulation of cardiac ANP and BNP mRNA in different stages of experimental heart failure.

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are cardiac hormones that are involved in water and electrolyte homeostasis in heart failure. Although both hormones exert almost identical biological actions, the differential regulation of cardiac ANP and BNP mRNA in compensated and overt heart failure is not known. To study the hypothesis that cardiac BNP is more specifically induced in overt heart failure, a large aortocaval shunt of 30 days duration was produced in rats and compared with compensated heart failure. Compensated heart failure was induced either by a small shunt of 30 days duration or by a large shunt of 3 days duration. Both heart failure models were characterized by increased cardiac weight, which was significantly higher in the large-shunt model, and central venous pressure. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was elevated only in the overt heart failure group (control: 5.7 +/- 0. 7; small shunt: 8.6 +/- 0.9; large shunt 3 days: 8.5 +/- 1.7; large shunt 30 days: 15.9 +/- 2.6 mmHg; P < 0.01). ANP and BNP plasma concentrations were elevated in both heart failure models. In compensated heart failure, ANP mRNA expression was induced in both ventricles. In contrast, ventricular BNP mRNA expression was not upregulated in any of the compensated heart failure models, whereas it increased in overt heart failure (left ventricle: 359 +/- 104% of control, P < 0.001; right ventricle: 237 +/- 33%, P < 0.01). A similar pattern of mRNA regulation was observed in the atria. These data indicate that, in contrast to ANP, cardiac BNP mRNA expression might be induced specifically in overt heart failure, pointing toward the possible role of BNP as a marker of the transition from compensated to overt heart failure.

Regulation of cardiac adrenomedullin-mRNA in different stages of experimental heart failure.

Adrenomedullin (AM) is a peptide hormone with vasodilating and natriuretic properties. AM plasma concentrations are elevated in heart failure. Whether cardiac AM-mRNA synthesis is increased in heart failure is not known. We measured AM-mRNA/GAPDH-mRNA in all four heart chambers in compensated and overt heart failure in rats with two different sizes of aortocaval shunt. Left and right atrial AM-mRNA expressions were unchanged in both heart failure models. Similarly, left and right ventricular AM-mRNA expressions were unchanged in compensated heart failure. In overt heart failure, however, the AM-mRNA expression was significantly increased in the left ventricle (145+/-20 vs. 100+/-3% of control, p<0.05). The right ventricular AM-mRNA expression was significantly increased only in a subgroup of animals with pulmonary congestion (lung weight >2.0 g, 141+/-16 vs. 100+/-11% of control, p<0.05). Ventricular AM concentrations were elevated in both ventricles in overt heart failure. AM plasma concentrations were significantly higher in the subgroup with pulmonary congestion than in rats with compensated heart failure (496+/-95 vs. 143+/-7 pmol/l, p<0.01). These data indicate that ventricular AM-mRNA expression and AM concentrations were upregulated only in advanced stages of heart failure. However, the exact contribution of cardiac AM synthesis to the increased AM plasma levels remains to be established.