A Matter of Caution: Coagulation Parameters in COVID-19 Do Not Differ from Patients with Ruled-Out SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department.

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) patients often show excessive activation of coagulation, associated with increased risk of thrombosis. However, the diagnostic value of coagulation at initial clinical evaluation is not clear. We present an in-depth analysis of coagulation in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected COVID-19. N = 58 patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 in the ED were enrolled. N = 17 subsequently tested positive using SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swabs, while in n = 41 COVID-19 was ruled-out. We analyzed both standard and extended coagulation parameters, including thromboplastin time (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), antithrombin, plasminogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), D-dimers, and fibrinogen at admission, as well as α2-antiplasmin, activated protein C -resistance, factor V, lupus anticoagulant, protein C, protein S, and von Willebrand diagnostics. These data, as well as mortality and further laboratory parameters, were compared across groups based on COVID-19 diagnosis and severity of disease. In patients with COVID-19, we detected frequent clotting abnormalities, including D-dimers. The comparison cohort in the ED, however, showed similarly altered coagulation. Furthermore, parameters previously shown to distinguish between severe and moderate COVID-19 courses, such as platelets, plasminogen, fibrinogen, aPTT, INR, and antithrombin, as well as multiple nonroutine coagulation analytes showed no significant differences between patients with and without COVID-19 when presenting to the ED. At admission to the ED the prevalence of coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19 is high, yet comparable to the non-COVID-19 cohort presenting with respiratory symptoms. Nevertheless, coagulopathy might worsen during disease progression with the need of subsequent risk stratification.

Reversal of apixaban induced alterations in haemostasis by different coagulation factor concentrates in patients after hip or knee replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with a specific inhibition of activated factor X (FXa). In case of bleeding or need of urgent surgery a direct antidote is not yet available. Off-label application of non-specific haemostatic agents, such as prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa), has been reported to reverse the effects of apixaban in in vitro and animal studies. The aim of this study is to measure the reversal potential of PCC and rFVIIa in patients with prophylactic apixaban concentrations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Whole blood from patients under prophylactic therapy with apixaban was spiked with two doses of PCC or rFVIIa. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM®), prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial prothrombin time (aPTT) were performed. RESULTS: Prolongations in PT and aPTT were corrected by the different concentrates with variable efficacies (PCC

QCM-D surpassing clinical standard for the dose administration of new oral anticoagulant in the patient of coagulation disorders.

The study focuses the dose administration of dabigatran to avoid the deaths due to hemorrhagic complications and thromboembolic stroke in clinics worldwide. To target the issue, a novel emerging acoustic technology, namely ''Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation'' (QCM-D) has been applied, while the acoustic assays namely ''activated Partial Thromboplastin Time'' (aPTT) and ''Prothrombinase complex-induced Clotting Test'' (PiCT) have been compared with the standard methods in parallel. Both techniques have been applied to 300 samples, including 220 plasma samples of patients suffering coagulation disorders and 80 plasma samples of non-patients. In comparison, the coagulation times of the acoustic aPTT and PiCT yielded an excellent correlation with the standard methods with in analytical standard deviation limits. Finally, the acoustic aPTT assay is the ''gold standard'' for a dose administration of the new oral anticoagulant, where the Δf/ΔΓ ratio of the acoustic assay demonstrates that dabigatran with FEIBA 50 combination could be a safe remedy to avoid the deaths in clinics.

In vitro and ex vivo Measurement of Prophylactic Dabigatran Concentrations with a New Ecarin-Based Thromboelastometry Test.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of oral anticoagulants has been approved, including dabigatran etexilate (DE). DE is a direct thrombin inhibitor that requires no routine monitoring, but, if necessary (e.g. urgent surgery etc.), the diluted thrombin time measured with Hemoclot® has shown reliable results. So far, no point-of-care (PoC) assay is available to measure DE effects. The EcaTEM assay uses ecarin to initiate the coagulation cascade at the step of thrombin generation and measures the clotting time (CT) by thromboelastometry. METHODS: This study investigated the correlation of the EcaTEM with standard laboratory assays in dabigatran-treated patients. Ten patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty were included in the study. DE for thromboprophylaxis was started 4 h after surgery. Blood samples were taken before surgery as well as 2, 6 and 12 h after ingestion on the 3rd postoperative day. Dabigatran concentration (Hemoclot), activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time and CT EcaTEM were measured. RESULTS: Only CT EcaTEM and Hemoclot showed a correlation > 0.75 for all measurements. CONCLUSION: CT EcaTEM appears a valid PoC method parameter to detect thrombin inhibition and thus the presence of dabigatran beside diluted thrombin time at different concentration levels. This may represent an opportunity to identify the presence of dabigatran, e.g., in emergency situations.

In vitro reversal of supratherapeutic rivaroxaban levels with coagulation factor concentrates.

BACKGROUND: A bleeding patient undergoing therapy with new oral anticoagulants is every clinician's nightmare as no specific reversal agent is available yet. This in vitro study investigated the effect of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on supratherapeutic rivaroxaban concentrations using standard laboratory parameters (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] and PT ratio) and thromboelastometry (clotting time [CT]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples from 10 healthy volunteers were collected and spiked with a supratherapeutic dose of rivaroxaban. Afterwards PCC, rFVIIa and aPCC were added in two doses. The laboratory parameters were measured and thromboelastometry was performed. RESULTS: The addition of the reversal agents had the following statistically significant effects (all p<0.01): +25 IU/kg PCC: CT -15 s, aPTT +5 s; +50 IU/kg PCC: aPTT +11 s; +90 µg rFVIIa: CT -141 s; +25 IU/kg aPCC: CT -142 s, aPTT -9 s, PT ratio +14%, PT -10.5 s; +50 IU/kg aPCC: CT -118 s, aPTT -7 s, PT ratio +17%, PT -12.2 s. DISCUSSION: rFVIIa and aPCC, but not PCC, appear to shorten coagulation times significantly in standard laboratory and thromboelastometry assays. These results need confirmation through evaluation of these agents in the clinical setting.

Measurement and reversal of prophylactic and therapeutic peak levels of rivaroxaban: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Bayer HealthCare, Leverkusen, Germany) is a new oral anticoagulant drug. Anticoagulants may cause bleeding, thereby requiring reliable monitoring and efficient therapy. We investigated thromboelastometry versus routine coagulation tests to measure prophylactic and therapeutic concentrations of rivaroxaban and their reversal with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and activated recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) in vitro. METHODS: Rivaroxaban was solubilized, and PCC and rFVIIa were added in 2 concentrations to the rivaroxaban-spiked blood samples, and thromboelastometry and measurements were performed. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban increased tissue factor-activated clotting time (CT(ExTEM)) dose dependently. Activated partial prothrombin time (aPTT), prothrombin time ratio (PTR), and prothrombin time (PT) were changed significantly in both concentrations. Reversal with PCC in both dosages caused no significant change in the measured parameters. For prophylactic rivaroxaban dosage, rFVIIa changed the PT significantly but not CT(ExTEM), aPTT, and PTR. For therapeutic rivaroxaban dosage, the CT(ExTEM) was significantly reduced. The other parameters remained unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboelastometry can detect rivaroxaban effects. In vitro rFVIIa seems highly effective for reversal in contrast to PCC.

A calcium-containing electrolyte-balanced hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution is associated with higher factor VIII activity than is a non-balanced HES solution, but does not affect von Willebrand factor function or thromboelastometric measurements--results of a model of in vitro haemodilution.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is known to impair blood coagulation. The impact of calcium-containing, balanced carrier solutions of HES on coagulation is controversial. We investigated the effects of increasing degrees of haemodilution with modern 6%, electrolyte-balanced HES vs non-balanced HES on coagulation in vitro, and compared the balanced HES to a balanced crystalloid solution for an internal control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples from ten healthy volunteers were diluted in vitro by 20%, 40% and 60% with either calcium-containing balanced 130/0.42 HES, non-balanced 130/0.4 HES or balanced crystalloid. In all samples, blood counts, prothrombin time ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, ionized calcium, factor VIII activity, von Willebrand factor antigen, von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity, and von Willebrand factor activity were determined, and activated rotational thromboelastometry (EXTEM and FIBTEM assays) was performed. RESULTS: Haemodilution impaired coagulation in a dilution-dependent manner as determined by both conventional laboratory assays and thromboelastometry. Ionized calcium increased with balanced HES (p≤0.004), but decreased with non-balanced HES (p≤0.004). Prothrombin time ratio (p≤0.002) and factor VIII levels (p=0.001) were better preserved with balanced HES than with non-balanced HES in dilutions ≥40%. Thromboelastometry showed no differences between values in blood diluted with the balanced or non-balanced HES. DISCUSSION: In vitro, a balanced calcium-containing carrier solution of 6% HES 130/0.42 preserved coagulation better than did non-balanced HES 130/0.4 as quantified by conventional coagulation assays, but not in activated thromboelastometry. One explanation could be the increased ionized calcium levels after dilution with calcium-containing carrier solutions.

Sustained enhancement of residual platelet reactivity after coronary stenting in patients with myocardial infarction compared to elective patients.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated platelet reactivity despite antiplatelet therapy is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk after percutaneous coronary interventions. Current guidelines recommend uniform antiplatelet maintenance regimen after percutaneous coronary interventions for patients with myocardial infarction and elective patients. We sought to demonstrate that there is a persistent enhancement of residual platelet reactivity after myocardial infarction, requiring an intensified antiplatelet maintenance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 66 patients after coronary stenting for myocardial infarction (n=36) or elective coronary stenting (n=30) were included in this prospective, controlled study. Platelet reactivity to adenosine-5-diphosphate and arachidonic acid under treatment with clopidogrel (75 mg) and acetyl salicylic acid (100mg) were assessed 48 hours and 30 days after coronary stenting using light transmission aggregometry and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (Multiplate analyzer) simultaneously. RESULTS: Fourty-eight hours after coronary stenting all measures of residual platelet reactivity were significantly elevated in the infarction group. After a mean follow up of 37 days, residual platelet reactivity to adenosine-5-diphosphate was still consistently elevated, albeit statistically not significant. Contrarily, residual platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid significantly decreased and returned to normal by the time of follow up. Regression analyses revealed myocardial infarction, C-reactive protein and fibrinogen as predictors of enhanced platelet reactivity 48 hours after coronary stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction exhibit an enhancement of residual platelet reactivity sustaining for at least 48 hours following coronary stenting. This finding provides a rationale for a continued intensified antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction.